Thanks very much Tobias.



Have a look at this

 ls -la /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/supervise/
total 12
drwx------    2 root    
root         4096 Aug 29 16:40
./
drwxr-xr-t    4 root    
root         4096 Aug 27 20:30
../
prw-------    1 root    
root            0
Aug 29 16:40 control|
-rw-------    1 root    
root            0
Aug 26 16:55 lock
prw-------    1 root    
root            0
Aug 26 16:55 ok|
-rw-r--r--    1 root    
root           18 Aug
29 16:40 status

You see that the ok and the control file are named pipes.
If they donīt have that p in front of the permission Stop qmail and
delete
those 2 files and start the server again and i should be all fine.

//Tobias

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jesus Ruiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Vpopmail Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 5:56 PM
Subject: [vchkpw] Re: qmail-send is eating all availible cpu time


I have the same problem i check the file permission and they are ok, and
i
also check that qmail-send don't restart very often.

I'm using qmail, with vpopmail 5.2.1 and spamcontrol2.09

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# svstat /service/*
/service/qmail-pop3d: up (pid 1129) 7392 seconds
/service/qmail-send: up (pid 1121) 7393 seconds
/service/qmail-smtpd: up (pid 1122) 7393 seconds

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# svstat /service/*/log
/service/qmail-pop3d/log: up (pid 1128) 7406 seconds
/service/qmail-send/log: up (pid 1127) 7406 seconds
/service/qmail-smtpd/log: up (pid 1130) 7406 seconds

the log dir owner is qmaill

drwxr-xr-x    4 qmaill  
root         4096 Aug 29 11:50
qmai
drwxr-xr-x    2 qmaill  
root         4096 Aug 29 11:28
pop3d
drwxr-xr-x    2 qmaill  
root         4096 Aug 29 10:10
smtpd


the supervise scripts are like this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# ls -la /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/
drwxr-xr-t    4 root    
root         4096 Aug 25 13:06 
.
drwxr-xr-x    5 root    
root         4096 Aug 28 
2001 ..
drwxr-xr-x    3 root    
root         4096 Aug 25 11:01
log
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root    
root          334 Aug 25
13:06 run
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root    
root          347 Jan
14  2003 run.20030114
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root    
root          336 Jun
12  2002 run.bak
drwx------    2 root    
root         4096 Aug 29 10:02
supervise

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# ls -la /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/
drwxr-xr-t    4 root    
root         4096 Jul 29 15:53 
.
drwxr-xr-x    5 root    
root         4096 Aug 28 
2001 ..
drwxr-xr-x    3 root    
root         4096 Jul 29 15:53
log
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root    
root           29 Aug
27  2001 run
drwx------    2 root    
root         4096 Aug 29 10:02
supervise

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# ls -la /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/
drwxr-xr-t    4 root    
root         4096 Aug 28 18:13 
.
drwxr-xr-x    5 root    
root         4096 Aug 28 
2001 ..
drwxr-xr-x    3 root    
root         4096 Jul 31 08:57
log
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root    
root          198 Aug 28
18:13 run
drwx------    2 root    
root         4096 Aug 29 10:02
supervise
At 06:38 PM 25/08/2003 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>That solved it! Thanks now iīm happy : )
>
>Although i have stunbled in to another problem but iīll do a new post
for
>that one if i donīt solve it
>
>//Tobias
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kurt Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 6:11 PM
>Subject: Re: qmail-send is eating all availible cpu time
>
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Okay so this
> > >
> > > cd /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-send/supervise
> > >
> > > -rw-r--r--    1
root    
root            2
Aug 25 17:36 control
> > > -rw-------    1
root    
root            0
Aug 12 13:30 lock
> > > -rw-r--r--    1
root    
root            0
Jul 16 14:56 ok
> > > -rw-r--r--    1
root    
root           18 Aug
25 13:44 status
> > >
> > >
> > > Could be a problem ? how do i make them named pipes ?
> >
> > I just deleted the control file, and it was recreated as a
named pipe
> > almost immediately. I'm guessing the same would be true with
"ok".
> >
> > Take care,
> >
> > Kurt Hansen
> >
> >
> 




Reply via email to