Re: [vchkpw] How can I personalize some users in a domain ?

2006-07-02 Thread Bulent
I tried the patch as manual but I could not patch it. Because I got en error
as below;

make qmail-smtpd
./compile qmail-smtpd.c
qmail-smtpd.c: In function `main':
qmail-smtpd.c:728: warning: return type of 'main' is not `int'
./compile policy.c `head -1 conf-policy`
policy.c:1264: error: redefinition of `struct __policy_'
policy.c:1270: error: redefinition of typedef 'policy_t'
policy.c:60: error: previous declaration of 'policy_t' was here
policy.c:1276: error: redefinition of `struct __local_'
policy.c:1281: error: redefinition of typedef 'local_t'
policy.c:71: error: previous declaration of 'local_t' was here
policy.c:1287: error: redefinition of `struct __domain_'
policy.c:1293: error: redefinition of typedef 'domain_t'
policy.c:83: error: previous declaration of 'domain_t' was here
policy.c:1315: error: redefinition of 'domains'
policy.c:105: error: previous definition of 'domains' was here
policy.c:1315: error: redefinition of 's_domain'
policy.c:105: error: previous definition of 's_domain' was here
policy.c:1315: error: redefinition of 'r_domain'
policy.c:105: error: previous definition of 'r_domain' was here
policy.c:1322: error: redefinition of 'policy_check'
policy.c:112: error: previous definition of 'policy_check' was here
policy.c:1432: error: redefinition of 'policy_load'
policy.c:222: error: previous definition of 'policy_load' was here
policy.c:1511: error: redefinition of 'policy_parse'
policy.c:301: error: previous definition of 'policy_parse' was here
policy.c:1719: error: redefinition of 'policy_construct'
policy.c:509: error: previous definition of 'policy_construct' was here
policy.c:1829: error: redefinition of 'policy_construct_parse_arguments'
policy.c:619: error: previous definition of
'policy_construct_parse_arguments' was here
policy.c:1899: error: redefinition of 'policy_match'
policy.c:689: error: previous definition of 'policy_match' was here
policy.c:1951: error: redefinition of 'policy_applies_to'
policy.c:741: error: previous definition of 'policy_applies_to' was here
policy.c:1991: error: redefinition of 'policy_flags'
policy.c:781: error: previous definition of 'policy_flags' was here
policy.c:2039: error: redefinition of 'policy_find'
policy.c:829: error: previous definition of 'policy_find' was here
policy.c:2054: error: redefinition of 'policy_forbids'
policy.c:844: error: previous definition of 'policy_forbids' was here
policy.c:2297: error: redefinition of 'domain_find'
policy.c:1087: error: previous definition of 'domain_find' was here
policy.c:2316: error: redefinition of 'local_find'
policy.c:1106: error: previous definition of 'local_find' was here
policy.c:2337: error: redefinition of 'policy_free'
policy.c:1127: error: previous definition of 'policy_free' was here
policy.c:2371: error: redefinition of 'local_free'
policy.c:1161: error: previous definition of 'local_free' was here
policy.c:2398: error: redefinition of 'domains_free'
policy.c:1188: error: previous definition of 'domains_free' was here
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/local/qmail-source/qmail-1.03.

I installed qmail as qmail-1.03. I hadn't used netqmail-1.05.
does this condition cause that problem?


- Original Message - 
From: "Remo Mattei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] How can I personalize some users in a domain ?


> apply the patch manually.
>
> Remo
>
> Bulent wrote:
> > I downloaded  empf-toaster-0.8.1.patch
> >
> > as below I tried patch it . But I got an error one line as below;
> > Hunk #2 failed at 371.
> > 1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to qmail-smtpd.c.rej
> >
> > What shall I do ?
> >
> > Here is the patch operation:
> >
> > mailserver# patch < empf-toaster-0.8.1.patch
> > Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
> > The text leading up to this was:
> > --
> > |--- qmail-smtpd.c  2006-06-19 12:43:14.0 -0300
> > |+++ ../netqmail-1.05-new/qmail-smtpd.c 2006-06-19 16:33:20.0 -0
300
> > --
> > Patching file qmail-smtpd.c using Plan A...
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 336 with fuzz 2 (offset -271 lines).
> > Hunk #2 failed at 371.
> > 1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to qmail-smtpd.c.rej
> > Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
> > The text leading up to this was:
> > --

Re: [vchkpw] How can I personalize some users in a domain ?

2006-06-29 Thread Remo Mattei
apply the patch manually.

Remo

Bulent wrote:
> I downloaded  empf-toaster-0.8.1.patch
>
> as below I tried patch it . But I got an error one line as below;
> Hunk #2 failed at 371.
> 1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to qmail-smtpd.c.rej
>
> What shall I do ?
>
> Here is the patch operation:
>
> mailserver# patch < empf-toaster-0.8.1.patch
> Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --
> |--- qmail-smtpd.c  2006-06-19 12:43:14.0 -0300
> |+++ ../netqmail-1.05-new/qmail-smtpd.c 2006-06-19 16:33:20.0 -0300
> --
> Patching file qmail-smtpd.c using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 336 with fuzz 2 (offset -271 lines).
> Hunk #2 failed at 371.
> 1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to qmail-smtpd.c.rej
> Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --
> |--- Makefile   2006-06-19 12:43:14.0 -0300
> |+++ ../netqmail-1.05-new/Makefile  2006-06-19 16:37:44.0 -0300
> --
> Patching file Makefile using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 failed at 1663.
> 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.rej
> Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --
> |--- conf-policy2006-06-19 16:46:43.0 -0300
> |+++ ../netqmail-1.05-new/conf-policy   2006-06-19 16:36:55.0 -0300
> --
> Patching file conf-policy using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
> Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --
> |--- policy.c   2006-06-19 16:48:11.0 -0300
> |+++ ../netqmail-1.05-new/policy.c  2006-06-19 16:37:01.0 -0300
> --
> Patching file policy.c using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
> Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --
> |--- policy.h   2006-06-19 16:48:14.0 -0300
> |+++ ../netqmail-1.05-new/policy.h  2006-06-19 16:37:05.0 -0300
> --
> Patching file policy.h using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
> done
>
> ----- Original Message - 
> From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 6:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [vchkpw] How can I personalize some users in a domain ?
>
>
>   
> domain. Let me explain that case.
>   
> and receive any mail from anywhere except that domain.
>   
> email from everywhere.
>   
>
>   


Re: [vchkpw] How can I personalize some users in a domain ?

2006-06-29 Thread Bulent
I downloaded  empf-toaster-0.8.1.patch

as below I tried patch it . But I got an error one line as below;
Hunk #2 failed at 371.
1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to qmail-smtpd.c.rej

What shall I do ?

Here is the patch operation:

mailserver# patch < empf-toaster-0.8.1.patch
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- qmail-smtpd.c  2006-06-19 12:43:14.0 -0300
|+++ ../netqmail-1.05-new/qmail-smtpd.c 2006-06-19 16:33:20.0 -0300
--
Patching file qmail-smtpd.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 336 with fuzz 2 (offset -271 lines).
Hunk #2 failed at 371.
1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to qmail-smtpd.c.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- Makefile   2006-06-19 12:43:14.0 -0300
|+++ ../netqmail-1.05-new/Makefile  2006-06-19 16:37:44.0 -0300
--
Patching file Makefile using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 1663.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- conf-policy2006-06-19 16:46:43.0 -0300
|+++ ../netqmail-1.05-new/conf-policy   2006-06-19 16:36:55.0 -0300
--
Patching file conf-policy using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- policy.c   2006-06-19 16:48:11.0 -0300
|+++ ../netqmail-1.05-new/policy.c  2006-06-19 16:37:01.0 -0300
--
Patching file policy.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- policy.h   2006-06-19 16:48:14.0 -0300
|+++ ../netqmail-1.05-new/policy.h  2006-06-19 16:37:05.0 -0300
--
Patching file policy.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
done

- Original Message - 
From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] How can I personalize some users in a domain ?


> Bulent wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I use vpopmail5.4. I want to personalize some emailaddresses in a
domain. Let me explain that case.
> > I have a domain. 5 email addresses of this domain will not able to send
and receive any mail from anywhere except that domain.
> > Other email address of this domain can send to everywhere and receive
email from everywhere.
> >
> > How can I do this ?
> >
> > Thanks
>
> You might want to look at EMPF Email Message Policy Framework
> http://www.inter7.com/?page=empf
>
> It was designed to support what you are trying to do.
>
> --
> Ken Jones
>
>



Re: [vchkpw] How can I personalize some users in a domain ?

2006-06-29 Thread Ken Jones

Bulent wrote:

Hello

I use vpopmail5.4. I want to personalize some emailaddresses in a domain. Let 
me explain that case.
I have a domain. 5 email addresses of this domain will not able to send and 
receive any mail from anywhere except that domain.
Other email address of this domain can send to everywhere and receive email 
from everywhere.

How can I do this ?

Thanks


You might want to look at EMPF Email Message Policy Framework
http://www.inter7.com/?page=empf

It was designed to support what you are trying to do.

--
Ken Jones