Re: [vchkpw] Is it worth to upgrade?

[Tom Collins]

On Mar 2, 2005, at 9:47 AM, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
I am using vpopmail 5.4.0 since almost a year now, without any 
important
problem, in a server with less than 30 domains. Most changes in stable
releases until 5.4.9 seems to be only fixes for the database modules.
Since I use cdb auth module only, is it worth to upgrade? Any important
fix for the cdb module?
You're right, there isn't much reason for CDB users to upgrade.  
Perhaps after the updated vdelivermail is released (I might have time 
to get it ready this Thursday), it would be worthwhile.

Most of the significant (security/reliability) changes in the past year 
are in the database backends.

--
Tom Collins  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/  Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/
You don't need a laptop to troubleshoot high-speed Internet: 
sniffter.com

Re: [vchkpw] Is it worth to upgrade?

[Matt Brookings]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
| Hello:
|
| I am using vpopmail 5.4.0 since almost a year now, without any important
| problem, in a server with less than 30 domains. Most changes in stable
| releases until 5.4.9 seems to be only fixes for the database modules.
| Since I use cdb auth module only, is it worth to upgrade? Any important
| fix for the cdb module?
|
| Thank you in advance for any hint.
|
It's always good to keep up to date.  If you ever need assistance,
having the most up to date version will make that easier.  There may
be fixes for efficiency, as well as bug fixes that you simply either
haven't run into yet, or aren't aware of.  On the other hand, if it's
not broken, don't fix it :)
- --
/*
~Matt Brookings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   GnuPG Key 7D7E5F37
~Software developer Systems technician
~Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc. (815)776-9465
*/
banner("Support open-source!\n");
void banner(char *arg) {
~  char b[50];
~  strcpy(b, arg);
~  printf(b);
}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCJg5l/pZz8n1+XzcRAuG8AKCKY8e090hsYLTfgEB4A0z65JYYPwCeP3jl
+Bcf016wFt3xZ9hWcn1nSAk=
=axUN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-