* Zachary Bedell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-29 02:20]:
I'm not sure if vPopMail would return account found if you asked for
alex-foo. I don't have --enable-qmail-ext set on my server right now.
If you have a sec, could you compile vpopaccountexists on your system
and see what it returns?
* Zachary Bedell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-27 23:34]:
I used the GPL'd patches from interazioni.it as inspiration and to get
an idea of how to go about hacking what I needed into qmail-smtpd.c.
You can find my patches along with detailed descriptions here:
https://mail.adirondack.net/?p20
On May 28, 2004, at 2:52 AM, Alex Pleiner wrote:
After all, maybe the vpopmail-team should consider adding a tool like
yours to the official vpopmail dist.
I think this would be a very good idea. That way, it would be possible
to code a version for a non-vpopmail system as well, and the patch to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 28, 2004, at 5:52 AM, Alex Pleiner wrote:
1. --enable-qmail-ext=y
POP3-Acoount is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCPT is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.qmail-default contains bounce-no-mailbox
Will the mail be delivered? This also will apply to TMDA IIRC.
I'm not sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 28, 2004, at 10:28 AM, Tom Collins wrote:
Perhaps a name like vvalidaddr would be more accurate, as you want
it to respond positively for all types of accounts. I had discussed
this on the dev list a while back, and mentioned that it would be
Tobias,
it looks like there is a trust against this patch, just saying
generically it's ugly, but not beeing able to say why, and not beeing
able, mainly, to make another one working.
This patch is highly responding to DJ security and programming models,
while all the rest around (including
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2004 11:26 schrieb Tonix:
Tobias,
it looks like there is a trust against this patch, just saying
generically it's ugly, but not beeing able to say why, and not beeing
able, mainly, to make another one working.
This patch
* Tonix [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-27 11:31]:
This patch is running in hundreds of productions sites since more than two
years (without a bug and without any performance problem), and I'm
receiving dozen of e-mails, each month, thanking for it.
Tonino,
I appreciate your work and use the patch
Alex,
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 +0200, you wrote:
..
But there is at least one problem that can be considered as bug.
if you use comments in .qmail-default like in:
#| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail ''
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 +0200, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Another question:
Does this patch look, if there is a catch-all for the domain?
Yes, does look for catchall, aliases, mailing lists.
Is there anything to take care of when using vpopmail with MySQL in
conjunction with
I don't have that load, so I can't say. For my needs, routine is
practically not existent, and far much less heavy than qmail-scanner.
For sure your outgoing queue will be reduced, and your network traffic
will drop (because all wrong messages will be stopped before entering).
Just you'll have
Hi,
I have nothing but great things to say about Tonix's patch and the code
is quite straight forward to read, even for an old C programmer like me.
I use it personally and have it installed on more than 20 ISP and end
user systems with no problems.
Regards,
Rick
Tonix wrote:
Tobias,
it looks
On Thursday 27 May 2004 04:26 am, Tonix wrote:
Tobias,
it looks like there is a trust against this patch, just saying
generically it's ugly, but not beeing able to say why, and not beeing
able, mainly, to make another one working.
This patch is highly responding to DJ security and
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0500, you wrote:
On Thursday 27 May 2004 04:26 am, Tonix wrote:
*ahem*
+#include stdio.h
*ahem*
If you comment out this line, you have this compilation error:
In file included from qmail-smtpd.c:45:
/vpopmail/include/vpopmail.h:133: syntax error before `*'
This is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 27, 2004, at 4:54 AM, Linux-Guru wrote:
I found a patch [1] at [2] which enables qmail to first check against
vpopmail
if the user (email-address) is existant before accepting mail for it.
Yesterday I asked in #qmail (IRC-channel) for any
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
I'll ask, nextly, to join the development group and develop a robust
subset of calls solving this problem (for all, not only for chkuser).
Help on vpopmail would be welcome, at least by me, [1] but creating
another set of calls is not a good way to handle this
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0400, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
These patches don't have any glibc stuff in them, and they do check for
catch-all aliases.
Sorry for being picky, but my patch has not internal glibc stuff inside...
Just it must call vpopmail, who has glib
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0600, you wrote:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
I'll ask, nextly, to join the development group and develop a robust
subset of calls solving this problem (for all, not only for chkuser).
Help on vpopmail would be welcome, at least by me, [1] but creating
another set of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 27, 2004, at 6:49 PM, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0400, you wrote:
These patches don't have any glibc stuff in them, and they do check
for catch-all aliases.
Sorry for being picky, but my patch has not internal glibc
19 matches
Mail list logo
