Re: [vchkpw] No joy getting vchkpw to replace checkpassword.

2002-09-04 Thread Eric Moore

on 9/4/02 10:30 PM, rm at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Maybe I am confused but does this mean I have to
 acquire another top level domain name?  Can't I just turn my current domain
 into a virtual domain as far as Qmail is concerned?
 

You are correct.  You don't need a new top level domain name.   Vpopmail
allows you to add hundreds/thousands of email users who are not system
users.

cd /home/vpopmail/bin
./vadduser username

(vpopmail will query you from there)





Re: [vchkpw] No joy getting vchkpw to replace checkpassword.

2002-09-04 Thread rm

On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 21:21, Robert Porter wrote:
 On Wednesday 04 September 2002 10:30 pm, rm wrote:
 
  Could you post your pop3d run script?  and are you using the mysql
  option?
 
  regis
 This is the current one, which works with local users
 
 #!/bin/sh
 MAXPOP3D=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/concurrencypop3`
 exec /command/softlimit -m 200 \
  /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l -o -x /etc/tcp.pop3.cdb -c $MAXPOP3D \
  0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup zoomer.rp2c.com /bin/checkpassword \
  /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21
 
 This is the modified one which fails.
 I also tried replacing the real host with mail.rp2c.com which is a valid MX 
 record in DNS but points to the same host.  And I added mail.rp2c.com to the 
 virtualhosts file etc.  Still no joy. 
 
 #!/bin/sh
 MAXPOP3D=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/concurrencypop3`
 exec /command/softlimit -m 200 \
  /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l -o -x /etc/tcp.pop3.cdb -c $MAXPOP3D \
  0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup zoomer.rp2c.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw \
  /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21

Here's a copy of my .../pop3d/run.  I guess the big difference is your
path to /etc/tcp.pop3.cdb.  I'm not sure what's going on there.  you
might try this format - it's right out of life with qmail.  I
mentioned the mysql option because you usually have to raise the
softlimit.

#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 4000 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l 0 0 110
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup \
pop.mbpost.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21






Re: [vchkpw] No joy getting vchkpw to replace checkpassword.

2002-09-04 Thread Robert Porter

On Wednesday 04 September 2002 10:53 pm, rm wrote:

 
  #!/bin/sh
  MAXPOP3D=`head -1 /var/qmail/control/concurrencypop3`
  exec /command/softlimit -m 200 \
   /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l -o -x /etc/tcp.pop3.cdb -c
  $MAXPOP3D \ 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup zoomer.rp2c.com
  /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21

 Here's a copy of my .../pop3d/run.  I guess the big difference is your
 path to /etc/tcp.pop3.cdb.  I'm not sure what's going on there.  you
 might try this format - it's right out of life with qmail.  I
 mentioned the mysql option because you usually have to raise the
 softlimit.

 #!/bin/sh
 exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 4000 \
 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l 0 0 110
 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup \
   pop.mbpost.com /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw \
 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21
The etc/tcp.pop3.cdb bit is from Dave Sill's book, the author of life with 
qmail its the database of allowed/denied TCP relay clients.  

I replaced my run script with essentially a copy of yours and still no joy, 
then I looked at Eric Moore's reply and realized what I was doing wrong.  I 
was supplying bob instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] so it had no idea 
where to look I guess.  All appears to be fine now!

Thanks!

Bob



Re: [vchkpw] No joy getting vchkpw to replace checkpassword.

2002-09-04 Thread Robert Porter

Thanks Kevin,

I read (am reading) the link you sent, out of curiosity does a setup like that 
support a webmail interface? If so any material on which one and how to 
implement it?

Thanks!


Bob Porter

On Wednesday 04 September 2002 10:07 pm, you wrote:
 Hello Robert,

 Paul Gregg wrote a nice single user id how to.

   http://www.pgregg.com/projects/qmail/singleuid/index.php

 I'd shy away from vpopmail as it doesn't really work properly.

 Sincerely,
  Kevin Barnes - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Wednesday, September 04, 2002, 9:01:25 PM, you wrote: