* Tonix [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-27 11:31]:
This patch is running in hundreds of productions sites since more than two
years (without a bug and without any performance problem), and I'm
receiving dozen of e-mails, each month, thanking for it.
Tonino,
I appreciate your work and use the patch
Alex,
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 +0200, you wrote:
..
But there is at least one problem that can be considered as bug.
if you use comments in .qmail-default like in:
#| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
| /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail ''
Hi,
I have nothing but great things to say about Tonix's patch and the code
is quite straight forward to read, even for an old C programmer like me.
I use it personally and have it installed on more than 20 ISP and end
user systems with no problems.
Regards,
Rick
Tonix wrote:
Tobias,
it looks
On Thursday 27 May 2004 04:26 am, Tonix wrote:
Tobias,
it looks like there is a trust against this patch, just saying
generically it's ugly, but not beeing able to say why, and not beeing
able, mainly, to make another one working.
This patch is highly responding to DJ security and
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0500, you wrote:
On Thursday 27 May 2004 04:26 am, Tonix wrote:
*ahem*
+#include stdio.h
*ahem*
If you comment out this line, you have this compilation error:
In file included from qmail-smtpd.c:45:
/vpopmail/include/vpopmail.h:133: syntax error before `*'
This is the
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
I'll ask, nextly, to join the development group and develop a robust
subset of calls solving this problem (for all, not only for chkuser).
Help on vpopmail would be welcome, at least by me, [1] but creating
another set of calls is not a good way to handle this
At 27/05/2004 27/05/2004 -0600, you wrote:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
I'll ask, nextly, to join the development group and develop a robust
subset of calls solving this problem (for all, not only for chkuser).
Help on vpopmail would be welcome, at least by me, [1] but creating
another set of
