Re: [vchkpw] Re: [toaster] qmailadmin / vpopmail / autorespond 2.0.4 issue, mail loses

2004-08-10 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 12:13 pm, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2004, at 3:40 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> > Looks like that if using qmailadmin with autorespond 2.0.4, if and
> > email that received too many messages with vacation / autoresponder on
> > , is losing mail due to wrong exit level? (99 - stop processing .qmail
> > file)
> >
> > Can you confirm this? I noticed that today.
>
> Steve Fulton patched vdelivermail.c to get around this problem.  Fixing
> autorespond is probably a better solution.

it's already fixed, check the qmailadmin sourceforge page for my patch I put 
up like 8 months ago.

> I can't recall whether this problem is at all related to the larger
> problem of trying to use a single program to act both as an
> autoresponder and as a vacation program.

that's discussed on the patch page.

-Jeremy

-- 
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ www.inter7.com ++ 866.528.3530 ++ 847.492.0470 int'l
kitchen @ #qmail #gentoo on EFnet ++ scriptkitchen.com/qmail



RE: [vchkpw] Re: [toaster] qmailadmin / vpopmail / autorespond 2.0.4 issue, mail loses

2004-08-10 Thread Joseph B Schmitt II
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 10:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: vpopmail list
> Subject: [vchkpw] Re: [toaster] qmailadmin / vpopmail / autorespond
> 2.0.4 issue, mail loses
>
>
> On Aug 10, 2004, at 3:40 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> > Looks like that if using qmailadmin with autorespond 2.0.4, if and
> > email that received too many messages with vacation / autoresponder on
> > , is losing mail due to wrong exit level? (99 - stop processing .qmail
> > file)
> >
> > Can you confirm this? I noticed that today.
>
> Steve Fulton patched vdelivermail.c to get around this problem.  Fixing
> autorespond is probably a better solution.
>

I've just ran into this issue about a week ago, Jeremy has a patch to
force/fix the autorespond exit codes to (0) regardless.  Apparently,
autorespond exits(99) if you've excedded the time/num max.



http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=808962&group_id=669
1&atid=306691

--joey