Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

2004-03-12 Thread X-Istence
Cristiano Deana wrote: Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default? I think this should be made an option, if it is not set, look for vlimits.default, if it is set, then use it hard coded, i prefer that as i dont want

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

2004-03-12 Thread Cristiano Deana
Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva: Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default? I think this should be made an option, if it is not set, look for vlimits.default, if it is set, then use it hard

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

2004-03-12 Thread Shouguan Lin
- From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 8:26 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish.. On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote: Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva: Now spam threshold is hardcoded

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

2004-03-12 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 13:01, Shouguan Lin wrote: Is it possible not to hard code the header? CRM114 just like SA can add a header like X-CRM114-Status: SPAM for identified spam emails. If the header is not hard coded, then vpopmail can work with both SA and CRM114 or other spam filters.

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

2004-03-12 Thread X-Istence
Ken Jones wrote: On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote: Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva: Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default? I think this should be made an option, if it is

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

2004-03-12 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:35, X-Istence wrote: Ken Jones wrote: On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote: Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva: Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 shouldn't be better to put it in

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

2004-03-12 Thread X-Istence
Jeremy Kitchen wrote: On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:35, X-Istence wrote: Ken Jones wrote: On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote: Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva: Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15 shouldn't be better to put

Re: [vchkpw] Spamassassin: i wish..

2004-03-12 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:53, X-Istence wrote: The BSD code had a hard set limit, with the --enable-spam-threshold=15, which means that anything over 15 would get DELETED, and not just tagged, which is what SA does normally. does normally? SA is only used for tagging mail. You can send