Re: [vchkpw] any thoughts on use of chkusr patch with tmda?

2003-09-21 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
Hi Vince, it looks like I'm continuosly using the wrong call, in these patch over patch sequences. Probably I should have used byte_chr (look starting from left) instead of byte_rchr (look starting from right). Sorry. May you please confirm me if using the byte_chr call solves all problems?

Re: [vchkpw] any thoughts on use of chkusr patch with tmda?

2003-09-18 Thread Vinnie
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: This topic should have been already covered. Please check if this change works for you. Ciao, Tonino - In such a case, I may suggest a very general and to be adjiusted manually patch over

Re: [vchkpw] any thoughts on use of chkusr patch with tmda?

2003-09-18 Thread Vinnie
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: This topic should have been already covered. Please check if this change works for you. Ciao, Tonino If the complete address does not exist, routine looks for - characters, starting from left, and each time verifies if user exists, until no - is found or user

Re: [vchkpw] any thoughts on use of chkusr patch with tmda?

2003-09-18 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 18/09/03 18/09/03 -0400, Vinnie wrote: If I'm understanding this correctly (and definitely may not be, since I'm just getting started messing around with TMDA), what this would do is cause qmail-smtpd to: 1. look for an exact match of the recipient first - if an exact match is found, hand

Re: [vchkpw] any thoughts on use of chkusr patch with tmda?

2003-09-17 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
This topic should have been already covered. Please check if this change works for you. Ciao, Tonino - In such a case, I may suggest a very general and to be adjiusted manually patch over the patch like this.