Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and qmail smtp-auth patch, cram-md5 problem

2004-02-26 Thread Bastiaan van der Put
At 23:36 2/25/2004, you wrote: On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 07:33, Martin Kos wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tom Collins wrote: from README.auth: There is no need to include additionally the hostname in the call. is this new? .. i've thought there was some time ago some rumor about people that

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and qmail smtp-auth patch, cram-md5 problem

2004-02-25 Thread Martin Kos
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tom Collins wrote: Unfortunately, vchkpw up until 5.4.0 (final) was coded to the old, incorrect cram-md5 patch. Make sure that you re-patch qmail-smtpd with the new CRAM-MD5 patch. from README.auth: There is no need to include additionally the hostname in the call. is this

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and qmail smtp-auth patch, cram-md5 problem

2004-02-25 Thread Tom Collins
On Feb 25, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Martin Kos wrote: from README.auth: There is no need to include additionally the hostname in the call. is this new? .. i've thought there was some time ago some rumor about people that haven't added the hostname in the commandline of qmail-smtpd and have had an open

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and qmail smtp-auth patch, cram-md5 problem

2004-02-25 Thread Erwin Hoffmann
Hi, At 14:33 25.02.04 +0100, Martin Kos wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tom Collins wrote: Unfortunately, vchkpw up until 5.4.0 (final) was coded to the old, incorrect cram-md5 patch. Make sure that you re-patch qmail-smtpd with the new CRAM-MD5 patch. from README.auth: There is no need to include

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and qmail smtp-auth patch, cram-md5 problem

2004-02-25 Thread Martin Kos
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Tom Collins wrote: As for upgrading vpopmail, anyone who reads the UPGRADE file should easily find this information: uuups...shame on me i was upgrading from 5.3.30 (i think) and i wasn't reading the upgrade file because i thought there were no big changes :-( .. and

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and qmail smtp-auth patch, cram-md5 problem

2004-02-25 Thread Martin Kos
In the old scheme: in case you miss to include the hostname, your MTA is acting as on open relay. exactly what i had in mind You should prefer reading the documentation and READMEs rather then listing to rumors. yup you're right... for the next time i should check all the README/UPGRADE

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and qmail smtp-auth patch, cram-md5 problem

2004-02-25 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 07:33, Martin Kos wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Tom Collins wrote: from README.auth: There is no need to include additionally the hostname in the call. is this new? .. i've thought there was some time ago some rumor about people that haven't added the hostname in the

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and qmail smtp-auth patch, cram-md5 problem

2004-02-24 Thread Tom Collins
On Feb 24, 2004, at 6:29 AM, Alexander Gruber wrote: i have a problem with my vpopmail installation in conjunction with cram-md5. everything worked fine till i upgraded from vpopmail 5.4.0-pre2 to 5.4.1. i can´t use cram-md5 anymore and i always get the message vchkpw-smtp: password fail. up to

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail and qmail smtp-auth patch, cram-md5 problem

2004-02-24 Thread Jeff Koch
What email client do you use? At 08:29 AM 2/24/2004, you wrote: hi together, i have a problem with my vpopmail installation in conjunction with cram-md5. everything worked fine till i upgraded from vpopmail 5.4.0-pre2 to 5.4.1. i can´t use cram-md5 anymore and i always get the message