Re: SV: [vchkpw] Mails bouncing with .qmail in user-dir

2005-03-23 Thread Tom Collins
On Mar 23, 2005, at 1:21 AM, Håkon Nessjøen wrote: I can see that there is no hanlding of 99 in my version. I will have to upgrade. Are there any big differences in 5.2.1 - 5.4.10 that I should have in mind before I do a make install with 5.4.10? There are a lot of differences, and improvements

SV: [vchkpw] Mails bouncing with .qmail in user-dir

2005-03-22 Thread Håkon Nessjøen
+ Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Bounce = exit 100. Defer = exit 111. OK = exit 0. | | I'm not sure what 99 is used for. Hi, In qmail-command man page you are told about these options: If the filter exits 99, the mail is silently dropped on the floor. If the filter exits 0, the mail is

Re: SV: [vchkpw] Mails bouncing with .qmail in user-dir

2005-03-22 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 05:53 pm, Håkon Nessjøen wrote: + Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Bounce = exit 100. Defer = exit 111. OK = exit 0. | | I'm not sure what 99 is used for. Hi, In qmail-command man page you are told about these options: If the filter exits 99, the mail is

SV: [vchkpw] Mails bouncing with .qmail in user-dir

2005-03-22 Thread Håkon Nessjøen
/* Name of package */ #define PACKAGE vpopmail /* Version number of package */ #define VERSION 5.2.1 -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 23. mars 2005 07:26 Til: vchkpw@inter7.com Emne: Re: [vchkpw] Mails bouncing with .qmail in user-dir On Mar 22,

SV: [vchkpw] Mails bouncing with .qmail in user-dir

2005-03-22 Thread Håkon Nessjøen
I can see that there is no hanlding of 99 in my version. I will have to upgrade. Are there any big differences in 5.2.1 - 5.4.10 that I should have in mind before I do a make install with 5.4.10? Here is the old code: -- snip from vdeliver.c -- switch(wait_exitcode(wstat)) { case 64: