Re: [VOTE] release VCL 2.1

2009-11-16 Thread Andy Kurth

+1

-Andy

Josh Thompson wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I created a release artifact based off of trunk.  I copied trunk to a tag 
under the tags area of the repo that is named release-2.1-RC2:


http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/tags/release-2.1-RC2/

The artifact is an export from that tag.  The artifact, MD5 and SHA1 sums, and 
my GPG signature of it are available from my space on people.a.o:


http://people.apache.org/~jfthomps/apache-VCL-2.1-RC2-incubating/

The list of resolved JIRA issues associated with this release can be found on 
the VCL 2.1 release page (this has been regenerated for RC2):


http://cwiki.apache.org/VCL/vcl-21-unreleased.html#VCL2.1%2528unreleased%2529-ChangeLog

Installation instructions are on the Confluence site and in the INSTALLATION 
file included in the artifact.


Aaron, Andy, and I have completed a test install of all parts and were able to 
successfully create and capture a base image (we did not repeat this for RC2 
because there were only a few very minor bugfixes).


The directory created by extracting the RC2 artifact 
is apache-VCL-2.1-RC2-incubating.  Licensing information about perl and its 
required modules, php and its required modules, and mysql has been restated 
that they are system requirements according to the information 
under System Requirements on http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html.  It's 
also worth noting that the roadmap has been slightly updated.


Please vote by the end of the day on Tuesday, Nov 17th to publish this release 
(this allows for 3 business days to vote).  Please note that anyone in the 
VCL community is allowed to vote.


[ ] +1 yes, release VCL 2.1
[ ] 0 dunno
[ ] -1 no, don't release VCL 2.1 (provide reasons if this is your vote)

Josh
- -- 
- ---

Josh Thompson
Systems Programmer
Advanced Computing | VCL Developer
North Carolina State University

josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu
919-515-5323

my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFK/IMBV/LQcNdtPQMRAps5AJ9EGLEgeRNcksx3Ujv5NrGGrv8eEwCfRZs8
SRm+5RkM+YFse8wY8UruVao=
=Sdi4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


RE: [VOTE] release VCL 2.1

2009-11-16 Thread Miller, Fred Anthony
+1

-- 
Tony Miller
Technology Consultant
Academic Technologies
mill...@ecu.edu


-Original Message-
From: Josh Thompson [mailto:josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 4:50 PM
To: vcl-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Matt Hogstrom; Kevan Miller; Alan D. Cabrera
Subject: [VOTE] release VCL 2.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I created a release artifact based off of trunk.  I copied trunk to a tag 
under the tags area of the repo that is named release-2.1-RC2:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/tags/release-2.1-RC2/

The artifact is an export from that tag.  The artifact, MD5 and SHA1 sums, and 
my GPG signature of it are available from my space on people.a.o:

http://people.apache.org/~jfthomps/apache-VCL-2.1-RC2-incubating/

The list of resolved JIRA issues associated with this release can be found on 
the VCL 2.1 release page (this has been regenerated for RC2):

http://cwiki.apache.org/VCL/vcl-21-unreleased.html#VCL2.1%2528unreleased%2529-ChangeLog

Installation instructions are on the Confluence site and in the INSTALLATION 
file included in the artifact.

Aaron, Andy, and I have completed a test install of all parts and were able to 
successfully create and capture a base image (we did not repeat this for RC2 
because there were only a few very minor bugfixes).

The directory created by extracting the RC2 artifact 
is apache-VCL-2.1-RC2-incubating.  Licensing information about perl and its 
required modules, php and its required modules, and mysql has been restated 
that they are system requirements according to the information 
under System Requirements on http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html.  It's 
also worth noting that the roadmap has been slightly updated.

Please vote by the end of the day on Tuesday, Nov 17th to publish this release 
(this allows for 3 business days to vote).  Please note that anyone in the 
VCL community is allowed to vote.

[X] +1 yes, release VCL 2.1
[ ] 0 dunno
[ ] -1 no, don't release VCL 2.1 (provide reasons if this is your vote)

Josh
- -- 
- ---
Josh Thompson
Systems Programmer
Advanced Computing | VCL Developer
North Carolina State University

josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu
919-515-5323

my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFK/IMBV/LQcNdtPQMRAps5AJ9EGLEgeRNcksx3Ujv5NrGGrv8eEwCfRZs8
SRm+5RkM+YFse8wY8UruVao=
=Sdi4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [VOTE] release VCL 2.1 - RC2

2009-11-16 Thread Josh Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

[X] +1 yes, release VCL 2.1
[ ] 0 dunno
[ ] -1 no, don't release VCL 2.1 (provide reasons if this is your vote)

Josh
- -- 
- ---
Josh Thompson
Systems Programmer
Advanced Computing | VCL Developer
North Carolina State University

josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu
919-515-5323

my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLAWszV/LQcNdtPQMRAhKMAJ4+elWQHhP88l4tbRy3YTBx7sVY7ACeK8nL
u75t3s+/CDyDmWamt7LcLQo=
=mVXW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [VOTE] release VCL 2.1

2009-11-16 Thread Mike Waldron

+1


Josh Thompson wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I created a release artifact based off of trunk.  I copied trunk to a tag 
under the tags area of the repo that is named release-2.1-RC2:


http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/tags/release-2.1-RC2/

The artifact is an export from that tag.  The artifact, MD5 and SHA1 sums, and 
my GPG signature of it are available from my space on people.a.o:


http://people.apache.org/~jfthomps/apache-VCL-2.1-RC2-incubating/

The list of resolved JIRA issues associated with this release can be found on 
the VCL 2.1 release page (this has been regenerated for RC2):


http://cwiki.apache.org/VCL/vcl-21-unreleased.html#VCL2.1%2528unreleased%2529-ChangeLog

Installation instructions are on the Confluence site and in the INSTALLATION 
file included in the artifact.


Aaron, Andy, and I have completed a test install of all parts and were able to 
successfully create and capture a base image (we did not repeat this for RC2 
because there were only a few very minor bugfixes).


The directory created by extracting the RC2 artifact 
is apache-VCL-2.1-RC2-incubating.  Licensing information about perl and its 
required modules, php and its required modules, and mysql has been restated 
that they are system requirements according to the information 
under System Requirements on http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html.  It's 
also worth noting that the roadmap has been slightly updated.


Please vote by the end of the day on Tuesday, Nov 17th to publish this release 
(this allows for 3 business days to vote).  Please note that anyone in the 
VCL community is allowed to vote.


[ ] +1 yes, release VCL 2.1
[ ] 0 dunno
[ ] -1 no, don't release VCL 2.1 (provide reasons if this is your vote)

Josh
- -- 
- ---

Josh Thompson
Systems Programmer
Advanced Computing | VCL Developer
North Carolina State University

josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu
919-515-5323

my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFK/IMBV/LQcNdtPQMRAps5AJ9EGLEgeRNcksx3Ujv5NrGGrv8eEwCfRZs8
SRm+5RkM+YFse8wY8UruVao=
=Sdi4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

  


--
Mike Waldron
Systems Specialist
ITS Research Computing
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CB #3420, ITS Manning, Rm 2509
Office: 919-962-9778



Re: [VOTE] release VCL 2.1 - RC2

2009-11-12 Thread Josh Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I forgot to add RC2 to the subject in my first message.

Josh

On Thu November 12 2009 4:49:51 pm Josh Thompson wrote:
 I created a release artifact based off of trunk.  I copied trunk to a tag
 under the tags area of the repo that is named release-2.1-RC2:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/tags/release-2.1-RC2/

 The artifact is an export from that tag.  The artifact, MD5 and SHA1 sums,
 and my GPG signature of it are available from my space on people.a.o:

 http://people.apache.org/~jfthomps/apache-VCL-2.1-RC2-incubating/

 The list of resolved JIRA issues associated with this release can be found
 on the VCL 2.1 release page (this has been regenerated for RC2):

 http://cwiki.apache.org/VCL/vcl-21-unreleased.html#VCL2.1%2528unreleased%25
29-ChangeLog

 Installation instructions are on the Confluence site and in the
 INSTALLATION file included in the artifact.

 Aaron, Andy, and I have completed a test install of all parts and were able
 to successfully create and capture a base image (we did not repeat this for
 RC2 because there were only a few very minor bugfixes).

 The directory created by extracting the RC2 artifact
 is apache-VCL-2.1-RC2-incubating.  Licensing information about perl and
 its required modules, php and its required modules, and mysql has been
 restated that they are system requirements according to the information
 under System Requirements on http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html. 
 It's also worth noting that the roadmap has been slightly updated.

 Please vote by the end of the day on Tuesday, Nov 17th to publish this
 release (this allows for 3 business days to vote).  Please note that anyone
 in the VCL community is allowed to vote.

 [ ] +1 yes, release VCL 2.1
 [ ] 0 dunno
 [ ] -1 no, don't release VCL 2.1 (provide reasons if this is your vote)

 Josh



- -- 
- ---
Josh Thompson
Systems Programmer
Virtual Computing Lab (VCL)
North Carolina State University

josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu
919-515-5323

my GPG/PGP key can be found at www.keyserver.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFK/KTFV/LQcNdtPQMRAkyXAJ41ayT97g8h9W8L7JnTUxovQiQQCwCggCFw
VG7CQj8PRKMezDGhitCaCJE=
=PjNC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [VOTE] release VCL 2.1

2009-10-26 Thread Kevan Miller


On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:36 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri October 23 2009 4:45:26 pm Kevan Miller wrote:

On Oct 21, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:

(Question to mentors: Do I need to vote in a successive email in
this thread,
or is this post an implicit vote?)


You should either include an explicit +1 in the initial vote email,  
or

reply in another email. Either is acceptable. I kind of prefer a
separate email, but that's just me...


Okay - since I didn't include and explicit +1 in the initial  
message, I'll do

it here.

+1


Most votes will include a formal statement on what the vote is about.
E.g.:

[ ] +1 yes, release VCL 2.1
[ ] 0 dunno
[ ] -1 no, don't release VCL 2.1 (provide reasons).


Now that you mention it, I remember seeing that in some places.   
Somehow, I
came up with an example email calling for a vote that I linked to  
off of this

page:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/VCL/VCL+Release+Procedures

direct link to email:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/stdcxx-dev/200601.mbox/%3c43c1c0a0.7040...@roguewave.com%3e

That email doesn't include what you mentioned.  I'll revise the  
release docs
to explain that part should be in there and maybe find a better  
example

email.


This is the strangest Apache release that I've ever seen... Taking
some getting used to... I have some questions/comments. Haven't
decided on my vote, yet.


Since this is the only Apache release those of us from NCSU have  
ever seen,
can you explain further why you say it is so strange?  I thought the  
release
procedures page followed the suggested guidelines pretty well.  I'm  
assuming
the items listed below aren't explaining that but are points you  
think need

addressing before finalizing a release.


It's strange to me, because I typically assume there is a binary  
build, in addition to the source. Installation seems pretty involved.  
I'm just going to be *reading* the installation steps, not actually  
following them...





* web/.ht-inc/conf.php contains references to Shibboleth and UNC. I
assume that's holdover from VCL's origins.


I left it in there as an example of how Shibboleth authentication  
would be
added in.  It is commented out, but I can completely remove it if  
you think

it is confusing.


It's fine, I think...




* Instructions on installation, prereqs, etc should be clear that a
user must determine the licensing of the technologies that you are
requiring/referring to/downloading. It's not clear to me if that
information is being conveyed. Clearly, you require GPL, LGPL, and
microsoft proprietary artifacts. Wondering how much of this needs to
flow through legal-discuss... Prolly Alan and Matt have thought about
this already.


The web frontend only requires dojo to be installed.  It is Apache  
Licensed.
The licensing for JPGraph is explained in the INSTALLATION file as  
well as
the fact that it is not needed.  There are several options on how  
you use
VCL, and therefore what external software is needed for use by the  
backend.
I'll defer to Aaron and Andy to answer this point further since the  
backend

is not my area of focus.


* managementnode/bin/install_perl_libs.pl will download install
libraries, IIUC. What are the licenses of these artifacts? Users need
to be made aware of what you are doing for them...


So, my concern is that we're clear about the licensing implications of  
VCL. If VCL automatically downloads some set of libraries, then users  
need to be made aware of the licensing implications...


--kevan




Re: [VOTE] release VCL 2.1

2009-10-26 Thread Andy Kurth
I gathered the license information for the Perl modules downloaded and installed 
by install_perl_libs.pl and added this information to README.  Two of the 
modules use LGPL.  The others use the Artistic License or GPL.  It would be 
great if someone could go through them and double check.


There was one module (Digest-HMAC) which I couldn't find the license for.  The 
Digest-HMAC module was a dependency for the Authen-SASL 2.12 module.  The 
Digest-HMAC module no longer appears to be a dependency for Authen-SASL 2.13.  I 
updated the Authen-SASL URL to fetch version 2.13 and removed Digest-HMAC from 
install_perl_libs.pl and README.


I added code to install_perl_libs.pl which requires the user to enter 'YES' the 
script will install and download the modules.  The following is displayed:


=
*** NOTICE ***

This script will download and install Perl modules distributed under
the following licenses:
- The Artistic License
- GNU General Public License (GPL)
- GNU Library or Lesser General Public License (LGPL)

See the README file for more information.
=
Type YES to proceed, type NO to abort:


Regarding the Microsoft artifacts, the instructions direct the person installing 
the management node to the URL of the page where the supplemental utilities can 
be obtained.  These are not direct download links.  Can the responsibility to 
read the license terms provided by the 3rd party be left to the person 
downloading the files?


Thanks,
Andy



Andy Kurth wrote:
I will look up the licenses of the modules the install_perl_libs.pl 
script downloads/installs and include a disclaimer when the script is 
executed.  I will add the license information to the list of 
prerequisites in README.  Will this be sufficient?


-Andy

Kevan Miller wrote:


On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:36 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri October 23 2009 4:45:26 pm Kevan Miller wrote:

On Oct 21, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:

(Question to mentors: Do I need to vote in a successive email in
this thread,
or is this post an implicit vote?)


You should either include an explicit +1 in the initial vote email, or
reply in another email. Either is acceptable. I kind of prefer a
separate email, but that's just me...


Okay - since I didn't include and explicit +1 in the initial message, 
I'll do

it here.

+1


Most votes will include a formal statement on what the vote is about.
E.g.:

[ ] +1 yes, release VCL 2.1
[ ] 0 dunno
[ ] -1 no, don't release VCL 2.1 (provide reasons).


Now that you mention it, I remember seeing that in some places.  
Somehow, I
came up with an example email calling for a vote that I linked to off 
of this

page:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/VCL/VCL+Release+Procedures

direct link to email:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/stdcxx-dev/200601.mbox/%3c43c1c0a0.7040...@roguewave.com%3e 



That email doesn't include what you mentioned.  I'll revise the 
release docs

to explain that part should be in there and maybe find a better example
email.


This is the strangest Apache release that I've ever seen... Taking
some getting used to... I have some questions/comments. Haven't
decided on my vote, yet.


Since this is the only Apache release those of us from NCSU have 
ever seen,
can you explain further why you say it is so strange?  I thought the 
release
procedures page followed the suggested guidelines pretty well.  I'm 
assuming
the items listed below aren't explaining that but are points you 
think need

addressing before finalizing a release.


It's strange to me, because I typically assume there is a binary 
build, in addition to the source. Installation seems pretty involved. 
I'm just going to be *reading* the installation steps, not actually 
following them...





* web/.ht-inc/conf.php contains references to Shibboleth and UNC. I
assume that's holdover from VCL's origins.


I left it in there as an example of how Shibboleth authentication 
would be
added in.  It is commented out, but I can completely remove it if you 
think

it is confusing.


It's fine, I think...




* Instructions on installation, prereqs, etc should be clear that a
user must determine the licensing of the technologies that you are
requiring/referring to/downloading. It's not clear to me if that
information is being conveyed. Clearly, you require GPL, LGPL, and
microsoft proprietary artifacts. Wondering how much of this needs to
flow through legal-discuss... Prolly Alan and Matt have thought about
this already.


The web frontend only requires dojo to be installed.  It is Apache 
Licensed.
The licensing for JPGraph is explained in the INSTALLATION file as 
well as
the fact that it is not needed.  There are several options on how you 
use
VCL, and therefore what external software is needed for use by the 
backend.
I'll defer to Aaron and 

Re: [VOTE] release VCL 2.1

2009-10-23 Thread Josh Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri October 23 2009 4:45:26 pm Kevan Miller wrote:
 On Oct 21, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Josh Thompson wrote:
  (Question to mentors: Do I need to vote in a successive email in
  this thread,
  or is this post an implicit vote?)

 You should either include an explicit +1 in the initial vote email, or
 reply in another email. Either is acceptable. I kind of prefer a
 separate email, but that's just me...

Okay - since I didn't include and explicit +1 in the initial message, I'll do 
it here.

+1

 Most votes will include a formal statement on what the vote is about.
 E.g.:

 [ ] +1 yes, release VCL 2.1
 [ ] 0 dunno
 [ ] -1 no, don't release VCL 2.1 (provide reasons).

Now that you mention it, I remember seeing that in some places.  Somehow, I 
came up with an example email calling for a vote that I linked to off of this 
page:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/VCL/VCL+Release+Procedures

direct link to email:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/stdcxx-dev/200601.mbox/%3c43c1c0a0.7040...@roguewave.com%3e

That email doesn't include what you mentioned.  I'll revise the release docs 
to explain that part should be in there and maybe find a better example 
email.

 This is the strangest Apache release that I've ever seen... Taking
 some getting used to... I have some questions/comments. Haven't
 decided on my vote, yet.

Since this is the only Apache release those of us from NCSU have ever seen, 
can you explain further why you say it is so strange?  I thought the release 
procedures page followed the suggested guidelines pretty well.  I'm assuming 
the items listed below aren't explaining that but are points you think need 
addressing before finalizing a release.

 * web/.ht-inc/conf.php contains references to Shibboleth and UNC. I
 assume that's holdover from VCL's origins.

I left it in there as an example of how Shibboleth authentication would be 
added in.  It is commented out, but I can completely remove it if you think 
it is confusing.

 * Instructions on installation, prereqs, etc should be clear that a
 user must determine the licensing of the technologies that you are
 requiring/referring to/downloading. It's not clear to me if that
 information is being conveyed. Clearly, you require GPL, LGPL, and
 microsoft proprietary artifacts. Wondering how much of this needs to
 flow through legal-discuss... Prolly Alan and Matt have thought about
 this already.

The web frontend only requires dojo to be installed.  It is Apache Licensed.  
The licensing for JPGraph is explained in the INSTALLATION file as well as 
the fact that it is not needed.  There are several options on how you use 
VCL, and therefore what external software is needed for use by the backend.  
I'll defer to Aaron and Andy to answer this point further since the backend 
is not my area of focus.

 * managementnode/bin/install_perl_libs.pl will download install
 libraries, IIUC. What are the licenses of these artifacts? Users need
 to be made aware of what you are doing for them...

 --kevan

Thanks for your comments.  We want this to be as successful and correctly 
released as possible.

Josh

- -- 
- ---
Josh Thompson
Systems Programmer
Virtual Computing Lab (VCL)
North Carolina State University

josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu
919-515-5323

my GPG/PGP key can be found at www.keyserver.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFK4mhDV/LQcNdtPQMRAhOKAJ9YIi3FqH5djL0/xbLbqGqhax1v6ACeNcMO
ff9+YnGGvn98/wITV49jS7M=
=T1db
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [VOTE] release VCL 2.1

2009-10-22 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
I don't have time to double check this release until this weekend.
Normally votes are 72 hours.  I request that we don't count the votes  
until Monday, if that's ok.



Regards,
Alan

On Oct 21, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Josh Thompson wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I created a release artifact based off of trunk.  I copied trunk to  
a tag

under the tags area of the repo that is named release-2.1-RC1:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/tags/release-2.1-RC1/

The artifact is an export from that tag.  The artifact, MD5 and SHA1  
sums, and

my GPG signature of it are available from my space on people.a.o:

http://people.apache.org/~jfthomps/apache-VCL-2.1-RC1-incubating/

The list of resolved JIRA issues associated with this release can be  
found on

the VCL 2.1 release page:

http://cwiki.apache.org/VCL/vcl-21-unreleased.html#VCL2.1%2528unreleased%2529-ChangeLog

Installation instructions are on the Confluence site and in the  
INSTALLATION

file included in the artifact.

Aaron, Andy, and I have completed a test install of all parts and  
were able to

successfully create and capture a base image.

Please vote to publish this release.

(Question to mentors: Do I need to vote in a successive email in  
this thread,

or is this post an implicit vote?)
- --
- ---
Josh Thompson
Systems Programmer
Advanced Computing | VCL Developer
North Carolina State University

josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu
919-515-5323

my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFK30SGV/LQcNdtPQMRAhk8AJsGL4m0J1v0DC7U9Yyc31TIRjKXFACdE0bM
827++1u0XH9c2GqKP/pAE80=
=QrMV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [VOTE] release VCL 2.1

2009-10-22 Thread Josh Thompson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

That's fine.  Several of us were at a conference all day today and will be 
tomorrow as well anyway.

Josh

On Thu October 22 2009 12:57:29 pm Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
 I don't have time to double check this release until this weekend.
 Normally votes are 72 hours.  I request that we don't count the votes
 until Monday, if that's ok.


 Regards,
 Alan

 On Oct 21, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Josh Thompson wrote:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  I created a release artifact based off of trunk.  I copied trunk to
  a tag
  under the tags area of the repo that is named release-2.1-RC1:
 
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/tags/release-2.1-RC1/
 
  The artifact is an export from that tag.  The artifact, MD5 and SHA1
  sums, and
  my GPG signature of it are available from my space on people.a.o:
 
  http://people.apache.org/~jfthomps/apache-VCL-2.1-RC1-incubating/
 
  The list of resolved JIRA issues associated with this release can be
  found on
  the VCL 2.1 release page:
 
  http://cwiki.apache.org/VCL/vcl-21-unreleased.html#VCL2.1%2528unreleased%
 2529-ChangeLog
 
  Installation instructions are on the Confluence site and in the
  INSTALLATION
  file included in the artifact.
 
  Aaron, Andy, and I have completed a test install of all parts and
  were able to
  successfully create and capture a base image.
 
  Please vote to publish this release.
 
  (Question to mentors: Do I need to vote in a successive email in
  this thread,
  or is this post an implicit vote?)
  - --
  - ---
  Josh Thompson
  Systems Programmer
  Advanced Computing | VCL Developer
  North Carolina State University
 
  josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu
  919-515-5323
 
  my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
 
  iD8DBQFK30SGV/LQcNdtPQMRAhk8AJsGL4m0J1v0DC7U9Yyc31TIRjKXFACdE0bM
  827++1u0XH9c2GqKP/pAE80=
  =QrMV
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-



- -- 
- ---
Josh Thompson
Systems Programmer
Virtual Computing Lab (VCL)
North Carolina State University

josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu
919-515-5323

my GPG/PGP key can be found at www.keyserver.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFK4QMTV/LQcNdtPQMRAuNiAJwJ0WsP7IDgB8X5YneNoGcqmIz5ygCfVUe4
y6/cQYVx4fRbCJeaC6BoYBg=
=eFx1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [VOTE] release VCL 2.1

2009-10-21 Thread Aaron Peeler
Since I was part of packaging and went through due-diligence with a 3rd 
party. I feel this is ready.


+1

Aaron

--On October 21, 2009 1:27:34 PM -0400 Josh Thompson 
josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu wrote:



-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I created a release artifact based off of trunk.  I copied trunk to a tag
under the tags area of the repo that is named release-2.1-RC1:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/tags/release-2.1-RC1/

The artifact is an export from that tag.  The artifact, MD5 and SHA1
sums, and  my GPG signature of it are available from my space on
people.a.o:

http://people.apache.org/~jfthomps/apache-VCL-2.1-RC1-incubating/

The list of resolved JIRA issues associated with this release can be
found on  the VCL 2.1 release page:

http://cwiki.apache.org/VCL/vcl-21-unreleased.html#VCL2.1%2528unreleased%
2529-ChangeLog

Installation instructions are on the Confluence site and in the
INSTALLATION  file included in the artifact.

Aaron, Andy, and I have completed a test install of all parts and were
able to  successfully create and capture a base image.

Please vote to publish this release.

(Question to mentors: Do I need to vote in a successive email in this
thread,  or is this post an implicit vote?)
- --
- ---
Josh Thompson
Systems Programmer
Advanced Computing | VCL Developer
North Carolina State University

josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu
919-515-5323

my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFK30SGV/LQcNdtPQMRAhk8AJsGL4m0J1v0DC7U9Yyc31TIRjKXFACdE0bM
827++1u0XH9c2GqKP/pAE80=
=QrMV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Aaron Peeler
OIT Advanced Computing
College of Engineering-NCSU
919.513.4571
http://vcl.ncsu.edu