Re: [vcl-team] Re: VCL: public/private IP discrepency?

2012-06-26 Thread Michael Jinks
No, that's not the problem we're having. (We *did* have that problem, and just deleting the offending rule file no lnoger works in RHEL 6, but we fixed it by creating /etc/udev/rules.d/75-persistent-net-generator.rules as a symlink to /dev/null). At this point, Linux is doing the right thing

Re: [vcl-team] Re: VCL: public/private IP discrepency?

2012-06-26 Thread Aaron Peeler
Hello Mike, I'm curious if the management node set to statically assign the public address. Can you double check the settings for your management node? Select Management node- Edit management Node Information and select Edit. Near the bottom. With this feature you can define how VCL handles the

Re: [vcl-team] Re: VCL: public/private IP discrepency?

2012-06-25 Thread Michael Jinks
That's more or less what we're doing. Here are some details: The source VM I'm capturing from is not represented in DNS at all. On my management node in /etc/hosts I have: 10.50.84.15 vcl-linux-template-2-bak 128.135.192.15 vcl-linux-template-2 (The second line is for my reference; it

Re: [vcl-team] Re: VCL: public/private IP discrepency?

2012-06-25 Thread Mike Haudenschild
Ahh, I think you're running into this: http://markmail.org/message/t2ajnaew5qe4jxul On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Michael Jinks mji...@uchicago.edu wrote: That's more or less what we're doing. Here are some details: The source VM I'm capturing from is not represented in DNS at all. On

Re: [vcl-team] Re: VCL: public/private IP discrepency?

2012-06-25 Thread Mike Haudenschild
To clarify: Linux is probably creating an eth2 because it's holding out that its OLD eth0 (which was in your image) might someday come back. On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Mike Haudenschild m...@longsight.comwrote: Ahh, I think you're running into this: