Adam Spiers wrote:
> This may be a good time to discuss the design of the `include'
> parameter. When you were deciding what its value should be, I guess
> there were at least three possibilities:
>
> (1) a chunk of shell-code which returns the actual shell-code to
> include
>
>
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
>> If a machine-parseable list of repositories is needed,
>> I think it'd be better to have a perl function that emits
>> it in one go.
>
> I don't see how that's possible w
