Re: status of sharebox-fs?

2012-06-05 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Wed, 23 May 2012 13:42:39 -0400 Joey Hess j...@kitenet.net wrote: I suppose it would not be out of place to mention the Kickstarter project I have just launched today. The first 1/3rd of it will be using inotify to automatically add files, and keep a directory in sync.

Re: status of sharebox-fs?

2012-05-24 Thread René Mayrhofer
On 2012-05-23 21:17, Joey Hess wrote: No, I punted on it. The inotify managed directory will behave differently/annoyingly when the user tries to modify files. This certianly doesn't perfectly cover every use case, but I feel it's an ok tradeoff, you can get used to that behavior. There is

Re: status of sharebox-fs?

2012-05-24 Thread Joey Hess
René Mayrhofer wrote: No, I punted on it. The inotify managed directory will behave differently/annoyingly when the user tries to modify files. This certianly doesn't perfectly cover every use case, but I feel it's an ok tradeoff, you can get used to that behavior. There is some event

Re: status of sharebox-fs?

2012-05-23 Thread Christophe-Marie Duquesne
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Joey Hess j...@kitenet.net wrote: Well, imagine there are two remotes, and they're both on the other side of a cable modem. Ideally it should avoid sending the data to both, if one can talk to the other. OTOH, if they're not otherwise connected, it needs to