On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 18:23, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Ah thanks, I did wonder about that.
Yah, I hope the "old" version will drop off of google at some point to
avoid confusion.
> Sure, there's no right and wrong. It sounds like your preference is
> based on a sense of aesthetics rather than mo
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Richard Hartmann
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 16:14, Adam Spiers wrote:
>
> FYI: My version of vcsh [1] is different from madduck's. He graciously
> agreed to let me have the name and may switch over to my
> re-implementation soon from what I heard from him.
mumble..
[1] https://github.com/RichiH/vcsh
___
vcs-home mailing list
vcs-home@lists.madduck.net
http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 16:14, Adam Spiers wrote:
FYI: My version of vcsh [1] is different from madduck's. He graciously
agreed to let me have the name and may switch over to my
re-implementation soon from what I heard from him.
> (a) Are your ~/.* files symlinks or not?
Not any more.
> (b
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 03:14:38PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> So with the direction this subthread is going, it seems a good time
> to ask everyone:
>
>(a) Are your ~/.* files symlinks or not?
>(b) Why?
I symlink for reasons similar to what you gave:
- Immediately know what is manag
So with the direction this subthread is going, it seems a good time
to ask everyone:
(a) Are your ~/.* files symlinks or not?
(b) Why?
I get the impression that some people on this list prefer to use git's
detached working trees feature, e.g.
http://www.mail-archive.com/vcs-home@lists.ma
