On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:20:49 +0100, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
also sprach Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.02.20.1722
+0100]:
I have to take care of it manually once. That is the first time I
setup the integration branch that merges in changes from the
overlapping
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:58:01 +0100, Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 03:08:23PM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:46:03 -0500, David Nusinow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:37:24AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:20:55 -0500, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:08:23AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Now, you are trying to make me go towards a mechanism I think is
inferior (a liner, dependent, and in my opinion, opaque, and somewhat
shaky linear
branches, and I
do not want to have to worry about integration all over again at every
upload.
Unless new information comes up on this thread, I am done.
manoj
--
Reinhart was never his mother's favorite -- and he was an only
child. Thomas Berger
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:04:21 +0100, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
also sprach Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.02.22.1627
+0100]:
I am not sure you have understood feature branches. They are
independent, no matter what the overlap. Each feature branch tracks
one feature
