On Thursday 02 October 2008 20:33:00 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02 2008, George Danchev wrote:
> > Quoting Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--cut--
> > Nobody is comparing git with quilt, really. Obviously you are trying
> > to compare different unit
Quoting Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--cut--
> Well, You look at the public branches to see the divergence. and
> if you think my repo does not match the sources (which is a trust
> issue, I suppose), You'll have ot do whatever you need to, since
> obviously you do not believe
On Wednesday 01 October 2008 22:07:12 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01 2008, George Danchev wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 October 2008 15:13:45 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 01 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> >> > also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[E
On Wednesday 01 October 2008 15:13:45 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.01.0302 +0200]:
> >> This is a strawman, really. The options are not the giant big
> >> diff vs quilt (equally horrible,
On Wednesday 01 October 2008 17:54:24 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
--cut--
> > 1) people do not need quilt nor dpkg to view and apply these patches
>
> I find it easier reading code than reading patches upon patches
> upon patches that modify code I can read. If there are dependent
> patches,
Quoting Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Oct 01 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
>
>
>> Assuming we have a number of feature branches, we may well have to
>> resolve conflicts among them, so an integration branch seems like
>> the right way forward. So unless we just build the package f
