Re: rethinking patch management with GIT / topgit

2010-03-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro [2010.03.24.0821 +0100]: While I don't agree with your prefered workflow, I think it's a very nice attribute of my proposal, that both workflows could be implemented with it. We could use the same tool and still have different workflows. I would love to

Re: rethinking patch management with GIT / topgit

2010-03-23 Thread Thomas Koch
Petr Baudis: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 08:59:40AM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote: In all three cases you're free to either keep or throw away the old patchset. Yes, but to the same degree e.g. with StGIT I'm free to keep the head of the old patch series. That does not mean the operation

Re: rethinking patch management with GIT / topgit

2010-03-22 Thread Petr Baudis
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 08:59:40AM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote: In all three cases you're free to either keep or throw away the old patchset. Yes, but to the same degree e.g. with StGIT I'm free to keep the head of the old patch series. That does not mean the operation *preserves* the history, only