On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:26:31PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
OK, it's a bit last minute, sorry, but here is a proposal that I
will submit to debconf in 24 hours time, any feedback is welcome.
Thanks!
Event type: Workshop (or should it be BoF? There is no explanation)
I think it should be a
Hi James,
just a small issue:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:26:31PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
Event Title: vcs-pkg.org workgroup
Subtitle: Drafting a roadmap for vcs-pkg.org
Track: DebConf
Event type: Workshop (or should it be BoF? There is no explanation)
Abstract:
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:31 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
Hi James,
just a small issue:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:26:31PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
Event Title: vcs-pkg.org workgroup
Subtitle: Drafting a roadmap for vcs-pkg.org
Track: DebConf
Event type:
also sprach James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net [2009.04.13.2326 +0200]:
If any DebConf attendees have a radically different proposal then I
suggest you go ahead and submit it, as the deadline is on the 15th
of this month, and we can then decide which of the proposals to
withdraw afterwards
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:41:51AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I always try to say modern VCS, instead of distributed. The
problem with SVN and all the other centralised VCS is not that they
are centralised, but that they basically don't know what merges are.
They pretend to merge, and SVN
also sprach Jan Hauke Rahm i...@jhr-online.de [2009.04.14.1146 +0200]:
Interesting point. Let's say we keep that field open until there is an
idea of implementation that would actually work. We can drop support for
VCSs and distros then if needed. ;-)
Absolutely. I definitely did not mean to
