even more fun, can we use conary on the vcs-pkg side without having
it on the package deployment side, that is can Debian use it to
produce .debs for consumption, can Fedora use it to produce rpms for
consumption, etc...
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
he template has "Fedora" as a tag, but the front page is looking
for "fedora" as a tag. I changed my page manually.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_
ion between Debian
> and Ubuntu.
And for that to work, the patches really need to be applied in part to a
pristine source. Some of the problem is that Ubuntu is so far into
patch land that pulling a discrete fix out is nearly impossible. Also,
diffs of diffs are an abomination (:
--
Jesse Kea
dependency chain) reaches the
> pristine source.
Sure, I didn't mean to state that it's an entirely black/white thing. I
do think though that it should be possible to mark one patch as
dependent upon another patch and so on, to leave breadcrumbs for a
developer to extract a particular cha
control and accomplish much of the same thing.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list
vcs-pkg-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.
