On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 16:31 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > I recently encountered Conary[0] and initially thought of it as > a package installation manager, but it turns out that it also > handles the other side, the package maintenance side. > > 0. http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Conary > > Which version control system does it use? > > Does Conary address the vcs-pkg goal, which is to marry maintenance > and version control, without requiring the entire distro to switch > the package manager or package format? > > Looking forward to any input...
Or even more fun, can we use conary on the vcs-pkg side without having it on the package deployment side, that is can Debian use it to produce .debs for consumption, can Fedora use it to produce rpms for consumption, etc... -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list vcs-pkg-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/vcs-pkg-discuss
