On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:20:49 +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.20.1722
> +0100]:
>> I have to take care of it manually once. That is the first time I
>> setup the integration branch t
tch series except in cases where human intervention is
indispensable anyway. I like that. I am lazy.
manoj
--
Reliable source, n.: The guy you just met.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:46:03 -0500, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:37:24AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:20:49 +0100, martin f krafft
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > That does not help me d
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:58:01 +0100, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 03:08:23PM +0000, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:46:03 -0500, David Nusinow
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > On Fri, Feb 22,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:20:55 -0500, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:08:23AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Now, you are trying to make me go towards a mechanism I think is
>> inferior (a liner, dependent, and in my opinion, opaque,
se this
> sort of workflow could stick everything in a giant diff like we do
> now, so nothing would be lost.
Or have dpkg understand not just quilt, but git.
I mean, if we are making dpkg understand quilt-as-a-version-control
system, why not also have it grok a modern SCM lik
ature branches, and I
do not want to have to worry about integration all over again at every
upload.
Unless new information comes up on this thread, I am done.
manoj
--
Reinhart was never his mother's favorite -- and he was an only
child. Thomas Berger
Manoj Srivastava <[EM
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:04:21 +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.22.1627
> +0100]:
>> I am not sure you have understood feature branches. They are
>> independent, no matter what the overl
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:35:13 +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.25.0828
> +0100]:
>> I am not opposed to it. If you can somehow magically create a tool
>> that can linearize the feature
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:33:48 +0100, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:37:07AM +0000, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:17:10 -0500, David Nusinow
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > On Sun, Feb
manoj
--
To err is human, to really foul up requires the root password.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
___
vcs-pkg
11 matches
Mail list logo