Would be cool to test any S2API vdr patches.
cu
Edgar (gimli) Hucek
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:34:01PM +0200, Niels Wagenaar wrote:
>> Hello all (and especially Klaus):
>>
>> It's official, the people from V4L have voted for the usage of the S2API
>> proposal to be the future for new DVB API i
I would be glad to test any S2API vdr patches.
cu
Edgar (gimli) Hucek
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:34:01PM +0200, Niels Wagenaar wrote:
>> Hello all (and especially Klaus):
>>
>> It's official, the people from V4L have voted for the usage of the S2API
>> proposal to be the future for new DVB API
> > It's official, the people from V4L have voted for the usage of the S2API
> > proposal to be the future for new DVB API
> > improvements (see the official announcement at the bottom) within the V4L
> > tree. Currently S2API is in a real
> > speed-train and new devices are added very rapidly. O
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:34:01PM +0200, Niels Wagenaar wrote:
> Hello all (and especially Klaus):
>
> It's official, the people from V4L have voted for the usage of the S2API
> proposal to be the future for new DVB API improvements (see the official
> announcement at the bottom) within the V4L
Niels Wagenaar wrote:
> So, this should mean that VDR 1.7.x should focus on S2API because of
> the obvious reasons. Has anybody started on a patch of somekind to
> include S2API in VDR 1.7.0 or 1.7.1? Mainly I was thinking of doing
> it myself (I have a Hauppauge WinTV-NOVA-HD-S2 which is allready
Hello all (and especially Klaus):
It's official, the people from V4L have voted for the usage of the S2API
proposal to be the future for new DVB API improvements (see the official
announcement at the bottom) within the V4L tree. Currently S2API is in a real
speed-train and new devices are added
