I demand that gimli may or may not have written...
> have compile errors with gcc 4.4. The attached patch makes vdr 1.7.7
> compileable.
Why is that a follow-up, and not the start of a new thread?
--
| Darren Salt | linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Doon
| Debian GNU/Linux | or d
Sure, the patch is not the best solution. You are right, whats to ment
const should be const. In the first step it's more or less a speed fix :D
> On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:40 +0200, gimli wrote:
> ...
>> have compile errors with gcc 4.4. The attached patch makes vdr 1.7.7
>> compileable.
>
> I won
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 16:40 +0200, gimli wrote:
...
> have compile errors with gcc 4.4. The attached patch makes vdr 1.7.7
> compileable.
I wonder if it would not be better to make as many things
as possible "const" rather than casting existing consts away.
I my code, I am trying to make everythi
Hi,
Attached is an updated patch, which also extends tools.h to return char *.
> Hi,
>
> have compile errors with gcc 4.4. The attached patch makes vdr 1.7.7
> compileable. What google told me, gcc 4.4 also affects 1.6.0.
>
> cu
>
> Edgar (gimli) Hucek
Hi,
have compile errors with gcc 4.4. The attached patch makes vdr 1.7.7
compileable. What google told me, gcc 4.4 also affects 1.6.0.
cu
Edgar (gimli) Hucek
gcc_4.4.dpatch
Description: Binary data
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linux
