[vdr] RFC: one or many positioners?

2013-04-21 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
I'm currently implementing support for steerable dishes, loosely based on https://linuxtv.org/patch/12911. In doing so, I'm defining a virtual base class cPositioner, which defines all the functions necessary to control the positioner. An implementation of cDiseqcPositioner will allow control of

Re: [vdr] RFC: one or many positioners?

2013-04-21 Thread Luca Olivetti
Al 21/04/13 14:54, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit: I'm currently implementing support for steerable dishes, loosely based on https://linuxtv.org/patch/12911. In doing so, I'm defining a virtual base class cPositioner, which defines all the functions necessary to control the positioner. Is

Re: [vdr] RFC: one or many positioners?

2013-04-21 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 21.04.2013 15:40, Luca Olivetti wrote: Al 21/04/13 14:54, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit: I'm currently implementing support for steerable dishes, loosely based on https://linuxtv.org/patch/12911. In doing so, I'm defining a virtual base class cPositioner, which defines all the functions

Re: [vdr] RFC: one or many positioners?

2013-04-21 Thread Arthur Konovalov
21.04.2013 15:54, Klaus Schmidinger kirjutas: The question I have now is: will it be enough to have *one* single positioner in any given setup, or are there actually users who have more than one positioner? Hi and thanks for bringing this feature to the job list! One is enough for me. --

Re: [vdr] RFC: one or many positioners?

2013-04-21 Thread VDR User
I don't have a dish motor myself but FWIW I know a few people who do and they all have only one in their setup. ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Re: [vdr] RFC: one or many positioners?

2013-04-21 Thread Dimitar Petrovski
I currently only have one dish with motor, but if the VDR allows it I might consider a second one. Although in that setup I'm not sure that I would use them on just one system. I would definitely add another receiver, maybe with a possibility to share between the two motorized dishes. On Sun,

[vdr] ERROR: video data stream broken with DVB-T, AVC and ITE9135 device?

2013-04-21 Thread Michael Smith
Hi, I've switched from DVB-S to DVB-T usb dongle with ITE9135 chipset and I'm trying to record an AVC channel. I'm using VDR-1.7.27. Every thing OK when I use VDR with streamdev plugin. In fact I've set my system to stream channels for more than 10 days. But after I create a timer to record my

Re: [vdr] RFC: one or many positioners?

2013-04-21 Thread Luca Olivetti
Al 21/04/13 15:52, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit: Any visual feedback will be done via the channel display of the skin, by comparing CurrentLongitude() to TargetLongitude(). And of course any section filtering will start only after the target position has been reached. Mmh, how will

Re: [vdr] RFC: one or many positioners?

2013-04-21 Thread Luca Olivetti
Al 21/04/13 20:17, En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit: Al 21/04/13 15:52, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit: Any visual feedback will be done via the channel display of the skin, by comparing CurrentLongitude() to TargetLongitude(). And of course any section filtering will start only after the

Re: [vdr] RFC: one or many positioners?

2013-04-21 Thread Luca Olivetti
Al 21/04/13 15:52, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit: One more observation virtual void StepEast(void) {} /// Move the dish one step to the east. virtual void StepWest(void) {} /// Move the dish one step to the west. I'd suggest a parameter with the number of steps

Re: [vdr] RFC: one or many positioners?

2013-04-21 Thread Luca Olivetti
Al 21/04/13 20:36, En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit: Al 21/04/13 15:52, En/na Klaus Schmidinger ha escrit: One more observation virtual void StepEast(void) {} /// Move the dish one step to the east. virtual void StepWest(void) {} /// Move the dish one step to the