Re: [vdr] sub channel numbering system

2008-03-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 03/06/08 00:49, Timothy D. Lenz wrote:
 Would it be possible to add support for the subchannel numbering system used
 with ATSC? Exmple of the channels in our area:
 
 4   KVOA
 4.1KVOAD
 6   KUAT
 6.1KUATD1
 6.2KUATK
 6.3KUATV
 6.4KUATC
 9   KGUN
 9.1KGUND
 11 KMSB
 11.1  KMSBH
 13 KOLD
 13.1  KOLD-DT
 14 KUDF
 18 KTTU
 18.1  KTTUDT
 27 KUAS
 27.1  KUASHD
 34 KFTU
 38 KUVE
 40 KHRR
 40.1  KHRR-DT
 48 K48GX
 58 KWBA
 58.1  KWBA-DT
 58.2  LATV
 
 All the x.x channels are the new ATSC channels, rest are old NTSC most of
 which, but not all, will be shut down in a year. For ATSC .1 is the primary
 channel and .2, .3, etc are the sub channels.  The # on the remote could
 be used for the . In the channels.conf an ATSC next channel number would
 look like:
 :@13.1

I don't like that dot notation.

You could add a '0' to the old channels and leave out the '.', as in

40KVOA
41KVOAD
60KUAT
61KUATD1
62KUATK
63KUATV
64KUATC
90KGUN
91KGUND

Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Hearing-impaired DVB subtitles

2008-03-06 Thread Kimmo Taskinen
Klaus,

I have sample for the problem explained below. Do you want/need it? It  
is unfortunately 68M and I don't know where to put it.

Cheers, Kimmo

On 04 Mar 2008, at 22:21, Kimmo Taskinen wrote:

 I tested 1.5.17 without any patches and only plugin I used was
 xineliboutput. I was lucky to get REALLY suitable program for testing
 from finnish YLE FST channel. There was a talk show where they talked
 in finnish and swedish. The difference between live mode and replay
 mode was interesting:
 Live mode:
 - talk in finnish: no subtitles
 - talk in swedish: finnish subtitles
 Replay mode:
 case 1 (replay started from a moment there is finnish talk)
 - talk in finnish: swedish subtiles
 - talk in swedish:  no subtitles
 OR
 case 2 (replay started from a moment there is swedish talk)
 - talk in swedish:  finnish subtitles
 - talk in finnish: swedish subtiles
 - talk in swedish:  no subtiles anymore after finnish dialog, if  
 replay is started from this dialog there is finnish subtitles


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] basic set-up for vdr and HVR 4000 in Ubuntu 7.10

2008-03-06 Thread ga ver
2008/3/5, Ondrej Wisniewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  I have installed the plugin with apt-get , no problem
 
   vdr -V
  vdr (1.5.16/1.5.15) - The Video Disk Recorder
 
  but when I run vdr with the plugin I got
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# vdr -Pxineliboutput --local=sxfe --video=xv 
  --audio=alsa
  --remote=none
  vdr: ./PLUGINS/lib/libvdr-xineliboutput.so.1.5.15: kan gedeeld
  objectbestand niet openen: Bestand of map bestaat niet ( can't open
  objectfile.File or map is not existing)
  what is here still missing
 
  Gaston


 Man, you have some confusion here! Looks like you are mixing up
 different vdr versions. I guess you compiled vdr on your own (1.5.16)
 and installed xineliboutput from the Ubuntu 7.10 repos which was built
 for vdr 1.4.7. That will never work! So if you want to get anything
 running just compile *everything* from source or install *everything*
 via apt-get.
 Furthermore, if you are not using the default paths where vdr is looking
 for the needed libs, you need to specify them via command line
 parameters ('man vdr' is your friend). Good luck :-)

 Thanks Ondrey


I will remove the complete setup and do it over with the apt-get version.
Later on I will restart with the sources and a later version.

gaston





___
 vdr mailing list
 vdr@linuxtv.org
 http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] VDR 1.5.17 - pre 1.3.19 compatibility mode problems

2008-03-06 Thread Rolf Ahrenberg
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Tero Siironen wrote:

 Maybe I need to make another test run with plain versions of both VDR
 versions when I get back to home. But anyway I have patched VDR 1.5.17
 with vdr-1.5.17-ttxtsubs-0.0.5.diff and ttxtsubs 0.0.5 plugin is
 patched with raastinrautaedition from 22-Jan so I think patches should
 be ok, or is there still some more patches for ttxtsubs? 1.4.7 version
 of VDR is patched with similar patches (from that timeframe) and as I
 said it plays the recordings (and the sample) fine.

Those patches should be enough and fine, so just recheck that the 
vdr-1.5.17 patch is really integrated succesfully. If everything still 
looks ok, I'd say there's a bug in the patch. You could debug what's 
happening in the additional StripExtendedPackets function found in 
dvbplayer.c.

BR,
--
rofa

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] DXR3 and subtitles in 1.5.x

2008-03-06 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Sami Sundell ha escrit:
 On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 12:35:54AM +0200, Sami Sundell wrote:
 
 Ok, now the subtitles work, but I still have problems with subtitles
 and OSD together - remote becomes unresponsive and I get errors:

 Mar  5 23:45:42 dvd vdr: [5102] ERROR: attempt to open OSD while it is
 already open - using dummy OSD!
 
 ... and this went away when I changed the cDxr3SubpictureOsd constructor
 to call the cOsd with proper level. Unless I'm missing something - and I
 bet I am - the system seems to be working smoothly now.

Mmh, it should be already doing it, look at line 39

http://dxr3plugin.cvs.sourceforge.net/dxr3plugin/dxr3/dxr3osd_subpicture.c?revision=1.1.2.18view=markuppathrev=vdr-dxr3-0-2

Bye
-- 
Luca


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.5 .17 - release candidate 2

2008-03-06 Thread Ales Jurik
On Thursday 06 of March 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:

 Sorry, I don't speak Czech, so I can't follow what's going on there.


Hi,

there is nothing more than I've tried to put into this maillist except 
discussion.

 With the recent change at least the Czech channels should work
 properly again. Can you confirm that?


Yes, I confirm that. Similar solution was proposed by bastlir at the forum (he 
proposed to comment out the line your patch is deleting). 

 For version 1.6.0 there's nothing more I can do than using the environment
 variable. Maybe later I'll introduce a workaround-provider-stupidity.conf
 ;-)


I agree with you but I'm afraid that such communications with broadcasters 
will give no results. This maybe will be successfull when big producers of 
sat boxes will make such pression too. But it seems that for them is more 
efficient to make localization which is compliant to broadcasters not to sat 
norms. 

BR, 

Ales

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] DXR3 and subtitles in 1.5.x

2008-03-06 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit:

 ... and this went away when I changed the cDxr3SubpictureOsd constructor
 to call the cOsd with proper level. Unless I'm missing something - and I
 bet I am - the system seems to be working smoothly now.
 
 Mmh, it should be already doing it, look at line 39
 
 http://dxr3plugin.cvs.sourceforge.net/dxr3plugin/dxr3/dxr3osd_subpicture.c?revision=1.1.2.18view=markuppathrev=vdr-dxr3-0-2
  

(slaps on head), ok, that's calling it with 0, in my local copy I'm 
calling it with Level (probably the problem was introduced when I made 
the patch for the cvs version supporting older vdr releases).
Sorry for all the trouble.

Ville, are you listening? ;-)

Bye
-- 
Luca


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] sub channel numbering system

2008-03-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 03/06/08 17:36, VDR User wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I don't like that dot notation.

  You could add a '0' to the old channels and leave out the '.', as in

  40KVOA
  41KVOAD
  60KUAT
  61KUATD1
  62KUATK
  63KUATV
  64KUATC
  90KGUN
  91KGUND
 
 That's fine as long as you don't actually have channel 60, 61, 62, 63,
 etc..  I don't particularly like the . either, but this method isn't
 any better.

Well, at least it doesn't require an additional symbol.
Besides, channel numbers are just that: numbers - and that's *integers*,
not decimals ;-)

Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Hearing-impaired DVB subtitles

2008-03-06 Thread JJussi
On Thursday, 6. Marchta 2008 07:58:49 Kimmo Taskinen wrote:
 Klaus,

 I have sample for the problem explained below. Do you want/need it? It
 is unfortunately 68M and I don't know where to put it.

 Cheers, Kimmo

Can you use vdr's cut feature and cut it to much shorter.. I gues that 30 
second  (or less) would be enought to debug.
Then it's not that problematic to store or attach..

-- 
JJussi

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] DXR3 and subtitles in 1.5.x

2008-03-06 Thread Luca Olivetti
El Thu, 6 Mar 2008 19:52:49 +0200

   Ville, are you listening? ;-)
 
 If you meant me then yes I am =)

No, I meant Ville Skyttä, the plugin maintainer, there are many
Ville here :-)

[...]

Though, if you get the problem that the OSD doesn't clear
 between subtitles, then see the 2. patch I'm attaching for vdr-dxr3
 plugin (though it could be in the CVS now, I'm using a tarball of the
 CVS that is somewhat aged now).

Yes, it should be in cvs, the only thing missing is calling the cOsd
constructor with Level instead of 0

Bye
-- 
Luca

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] DXR3 and subtitles in 1.5.x

2008-03-06 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Thursday 06 March 2008, Luca Olivetti wrote:

 Yes, it should be in cvs, the only thing missing is calling the cOsd
 constructor with Level instead of 0

That's right - all patches posted for the DXR3 plugin are now in CVS, thanks 
again to everyone involved.

However, Luca and Ville A, you seem to be using different patches to VDR's 
dvbsubtitle.c - looks like Luca's contains all the changes in Ville A's, but 
comments those out and uses something else instead.

Unless a better fix emerges, I'm quite interested in including one of these in 
the upcoming VDR 1.6.x package for Fedora and also ship it in the DXR3 plugin 
tarball (possibly modified so that it's only enabled if the primary device is 
a DXR3 if possible), but I don't quite follow which would be the preferred 
one.

Could you compare and comment (off-list is fine, this may be getting a bit off 
topic for the general VDR public)?

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.vdr/35860
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.vdr/35881

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


[vdr] [PATCH] Use pkg-config to find freetype/fontconfig flags

2008-03-06 Thread Ville Skyttä
Hello,

The attached patch makes VDR's Makefile use pkgconfig for finding libs and 
include dirs of freetype and fontconfig instead of making assumptions.
--- Makefile~	2008-02-29 23:43:03.0 +0200
+++ Makefile	2008-03-06 21:29:58.0 +0200
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@
 MANDIR   = $(PREFIX)/share/man
 BINDIR   = $(PREFIX)/bin
 LOCDIR   = ./locale
-LIBS = -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl -lcap -lrt -lfreetype -lfontconfig
-INCLUDES = -I/usr/include/freetype2
+LIBS = -ljpeg -lpthread -ldl -lcap -lrt $(shell pkg-config --libs freetype2 fontconfig)
+INCLUDES = $(shell pkg-config --cflags-only-I freetype2 fontconfig)
 
 PLUGINDIR= ./PLUGINS
 PLUGINLIBDIR= $(PLUGINDIR)/lib
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] sub channel numbering system

2008-03-06 Thread Timothy D. Lenz
Well, ., #, *, something in the channels.conf. 0 is not  a valid
notation because 0 is part of the number system. 40 won't work for KVOA
because 40 is KHRR. And when displayed it should be .

- Original Message - 
From: Klaus Schmidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: [vdr] sub channel numbering system


 On 03/06/08 00:49, Timothy D. Lenz wrote:
  Would it be possible to add support for the subchannel numbering system
used
  with ATSC? Exmple of the channels in our area:
 
  4   KVOA
  4.1KVOAD
  6   KUAT
  6.1KUATD1
  6.2KUATK
  6.3KUATV
  6.4KUATC
  9   KGUN
  9.1KGUND
  11 KMSB
  11.1  KMSBH
  13 KOLD
  13.1  KOLD-DT
  14 KUDF
  18 KTTU
  18.1  KTTUDT
  27 KUAS
  27.1  KUASHD
  34 KFTU
  38 KUVE
  40 KHRR
  40.1  KHRR-DT
  48 K48GX
  58 KWBA
  58.1  KWBA-DT
  58.2  LATV
 
  All the x.x channels are the new ATSC channels, rest are old NTSC most
of
  which, but not all, will be shut down in a year. For ATSC .1 is the
primary
  channel and .2, .3, etc are the sub channels.  The # on the remote
could
  be used for the . In the channels.conf an ATSC next channel number
would
  look like:
  :@13.1

 I don't like that dot notation.

 You could add a '0' to the old channels and leave out the '.', as in

 40KVOA
 41KVOAD
 60KUAT
 61KUATD1
 62KUATK
 63KUATV
 64KUATC
 90KGUN
 91KGUND

 Klaus

 ___
 vdr mailing list
 vdr@linuxtv.org
 http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] sub channel numbering system

2008-03-06 Thread Timothy D. Lenz
Like it or not Sub channels are here to stay and the . is the standard for
denoting a sub number. vdr-1.5.15

- Original Message - 
From: Klaus Schmidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: [vdr] sub channel numbering system

 I don't like that dot notation.



___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] DXR3 and subtitles in 1.5.x

2008-03-06 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Anssi Hannula ha escrit:

 Preferably on-list, as I'm planning a similar conditional patch for
 Mandriva VDR 1.6.x packages. That is, unless something better emerges.

Keep in mind that the patch could be detrimental if you have something 
other than a dxr3 with a better osd (though I'm using it with either the 
dxr3 or a xine frontend and in both cases I can read the subtitles just 
fine, in fact with xine I cannot tell the difference with or without the 
patch).

Bye
-- 
Luca

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.5.17 - release candidate 2

2008-03-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 03/06/08 11:36, Ales Jurik wrote:
 On Thursday 06 of March 2008, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
 Sorry, I don't speak Czech, so I can't follow what's going on there.

 
 Hi,
 
 there is nothing more than I've tried to put into this maillist except 
 discussion.
 
 With the recent change at least the Czech channels should work
 properly again. Can you confirm that?

 
 Yes, I confirm that. Similar solution was proposed by bastlir at the forum 
 (he 
 proposed to comment out the line your patch is deleting). 
 
 For version 1.6.0 there's nothing more I can do than using the environment
 variable. Maybe later I'll introduce a workaround-provider-stupidity.conf
 ;-)

 
 I agree with you but I'm afraid that such communications with broadcasters 
 will give no results. This maybe will be successfull when big producers of 
 sat boxes will make such pression too. But it seems that for them is more 
 efficient to make localization which is compliant to broadcasters not to sat 
 norms. 

I'd really like to know why some broadcasters don't adhere to the standards
(even though it would be a child's game). Are they actively refusing to, unable
to interpret the standard documents, or just flat out dumb?

Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Hearing-impaired DVB subtitles

2008-03-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 03/04/08 21:17, Petri Helin wrote:
 Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
 On 03/04/08 19:55, Kimmo Taskinen wrote:
 Hi,

 I switched recently to vdr 1.5 series and noticed an annoying feature/ 
 bug with DVB subtitles that was not present in vdr 1.4 series using  
 subtitles plugin.

 The problem is that the subtitles for hearing impaired people are  
 shown when watching recorded show. They are not shown if I watch the  
 same program as direct broadcast. Isn't there any way (except  
 completely disable subtitles) disable hearing impaired subtitles?
 I find it strange that it would behave differently in live and replay
 mode.

 I'm curently using 1.5.17 version with ttxtsubs and liemikuutio  
 patches. My language selection in DVB setup menu is suomi (finnish)  
 for both Audio and Subtitle language.
 Does it also happen without these patches (and any other patches, for
 that matter)?

 Klaus

 
 Hi Klaus,
 
 I have uploaded a small sample of such a recording which shows the 
 subtitles when replayed, but not on a live view. You can download it 
 here: http://rapidshare.de/files/38744369/hoh_subtitles.tar.html
 
 It was made with a patched (liemikuutio + ttxtsubs) 1.5.15, but it might 
 give you a glue of the problem.
 
 -Petri

The info.vdr file contains

X 3 11 fin
X 2 03 fin
X 3 03 dut

which indicates that audio is in Finnish, and there are two subtitle
tracks. The one with type 03 looks like any other subtitle
track I've seen so far, like

X 3 03 rus
X 3 03 dan
X 3 03 ger

in a La Crim broadcast on French tv. According to the specs this is
VBI data.

The one with type 11 is DVB subtitles (normal) for display on 4:3 aspect ratio 
monitor.

None of these two is specified as for the hard of hearing.


From what I was able to see in the clip you provided, the dut track is there
from the very beginning (don't know if it actually contains Dutch texts, though 
- my
guess would have been it is Finnish), and the fin track only appears when the
woman speaks English.

Since the 03 subtitles seem to be the same as what the narrator is saying (which
apparently is Finnish), it looks like the track description is wrong to
begin with, and the dut track is actually Finnish for the hard of hearing.

If subtitles are enabled, VDR tries to display the best match as defined
in the setup. However, if no best match can be found, it displays the first
one that arrives.

Maybe this is what's causing the problems here. While this makes sense for
audio, it might not be that useful for subtitles. I guess some change in
cDevice::EnsureSubtitleTrack() needs to be done to fix this.

However, there still would be the problem that VDR couldn't even tell
that the dut track is for the hard of hearing, because it is not
properly marked.

Or am I missing something here?

Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Hearing-impaired DVB subtitles

2008-03-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 03/06/08 06:58, Kimmo Taskinen wrote:
 Klaus,
 
 I have sample for the problem explained below. Do you want/need it? It  
 is unfortunately 68M and I don't know where to put it.

For starters, can you please just post the info.vdr file of this recording?

Klaus

 On 04 Mar 2008, at 22:21, Kimmo Taskinen wrote:
 I tested 1.5.17 without any patches and only plugin I used was
 xineliboutput. I was lucky to get REALLY suitable program for testing
 from finnish YLE FST channel. There was a talk show where they talked
 in finnish and swedish. The difference between live mode and replay
 mode was interesting:
 Live mode:
 - talk in finnish: no subtitles
 - talk in swedish: finnish subtitles
 Replay mode:
 case 1 (replay started from a moment there is finnish talk)
 - talk in finnish: swedish subtiles
 - talk in swedish:  no subtitles
 OR
 case 2 (replay started from a moment there is swedish talk)
 - talk in swedish:  finnish subtitles
 - talk in finnish: swedish subtiles
 - talk in swedish:  no subtiles anymore after finnish dialog, if  
 replay is started from this dialog there is finnish subtitles

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] sub channel numbering system

2008-03-06 Thread VDR User
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Timothy D. Lenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Like it or not Sub channels are here to stay and the . is the standard for
  denoting a sub number. vdr-1.5.15

Can't argue with that!  ;)

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.5.17 - release candidate 2

2008-03-06 Thread VDR User
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Klaus Schmidinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I'd really like to know why some broadcasters don't adhere to the standards
  (even though it would be a child's game). Are they actively refusing to, 
 unable
  to interpret the standard documents, or just flat out dumb?

I don't think it's a law they have to and if that's the case, why
should they adhere to them?  Maybe they think they have a better way
of doing things, or something more suited for the way their systems
are set up.  Unless it's a law, it's a recommendation and we all know
a lot of the time people choose not to follow them.

I wish everyone did follow one set of guidelines just to make what we
do easier but if I were a provider I can't honestly say that would be
a priority unless we didn't have our own hardware to provide to our
customers.

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr