> > I suppose it's ffmpeg's issue. Can you send the sample from Arte to
> > ffmpeg's developers ?
>
> I doubt it : the errors buffers in VDR seems more relevant to me.
why do you think that the messages like
Aug 15 13:19:08 vdr vdr: [24729] buffer usage: 70% (tid=24728)
Aug 15 13:19:08 vdr vdr:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 04:31:58PM +0100, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> CPU usage rather than userspace. Due to the critical timing nature of
> the patches, they need to have nearly the whole machine to themselves,
the patches are time critical as far as xine itself must time the
frames very accurately.
On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 03:41 +0200, Artur Skawina wrote:
> PCI in general should be perfectly fine, for SDTV at least.
> While displaying SDTV (vdrsxfe) I see ~20% cpu use for X on AGP, ~44% on PCI
> (same machine, different heads, AGP is MGA450, PCI is MGA200).
Yes, 40% CPU has been what I've se
Hi list,
A new version of the patch is now available at
http://lowbyte.de/vga-sync-fields
2008-08-17: Version 0.0.4
- now widened time window for double buffer updates from 20ms to 40ms.
This is done via drm-ioctl() though the chip doesn't provide
a native interface for this.
- this greatly
