Re: [vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

2009-03-08 Thread Marc Wernecke
 some x-vdr users reported problems with compiling mplayer and some plug-ins 
 like music too. We solved this by adding

 DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES

Why would this suddenly be necessary? 

I don't know, but it seems to work.

Marc

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

2009-03-07 Thread Marc Wernecke
Hi,

some x-vdr users reported problems with compiling mplayer and some plug-ins 
like music too. We solved this by adding

DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES 

to the VDR Makefile and patching the driver header files

--- ./linux/include/linux/dvb/video.h.orig  2009-03-03 09:54:58.0 
+0100
+++ ./linux/include/linux/dvb/video.h   2009-03-03 09:45:30.0 +0100
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 #include linux/compiler.h
 #else
+#include linux/compiler.h
 #include stdint.h
 #include time.h
 #endif

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

2009-03-07 Thread Anssi Hannula
Gregoire Favre wrote:
 Hello,
 
 just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which
 fails if I don't use this :
[...]

This is because of a kernel regression:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0902.3/00411.html

A set of patches fixing this is available here:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0902.3/00955.html
and here:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=shortlog;h=core/header-fixes

Specifically, the one fixing the breakage in DVB headers is make most
exported headers use strict integer types, i.e.:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commitdiff;h=57b4b9d7b56d283b6619a893341be16d1a0467a6

I do wonder why it hasn't yet been pushed into Torvalds' tree (it has
been over a week since the patches were published), though.

-- 
Anssi Hannula

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

2009-03-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 03.03.2009 22:23, Gregoire Favre wrote:
 Hello,
 
 just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which
 fails if I don't use this :
 
 --- vdr.c~  2009-01-18 12:02:37.0 +0100
 +++ vdr.c   2009-03-03 22:17:49.0 +0100
 @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
  #include pwd.h
  #include signal.h
  #include stdlib.h
 +#include linux/types.h
  #include sys/capability.h
  #include sys/prctl.h
  #include termios.h

vdr.c compiles just fine here with the most recent version of v4l-dvb from
linuxtv.org (6bd427caa0cb).

I did report a problem with the driver's header files, though, in

  http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2009-March/031934.html

However, there has been no repsonse to that, and the problem still
persists with the current version.

Just curious: don't you have a problem compiling dvbdevice.c?

Klaus


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

2009-03-06 Thread Alex Betis
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Klaus Schmidinger 
klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote:

 On 03.03.2009 22:23, Gregoire Favre wrote:
  Hello,
 
  just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which
  fails if I don't use this :
 
  --- vdr.c~  2009-01-18 12:02:37.0 +0100
  +++ vdr.c   2009-03-03 22:17:49.0 +0100
  @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
   #include pwd.h
   #include signal.h
   #include stdlib.h
  +#include linux/types.h
   #include sys/capability.h
   #include sys/prctl.h
   #include termios.h

 vdr.c compiles just fine here with the most recent version of v4l-dvb from
 linuxtv.org (6bd427caa0cb).

 I did report a problem with the driver's header files, though, in

  http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2009-March/031934.html

 However, there has been no repsonse to that, and the problem still
 persists with the current version.

 Just curious: don't you have a problem compiling dvbdevice.c?

I've faced the same problem after upgrading kernel to 2.6.27.19

Found the solution on the net: add the following to VDR Makefile:
DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES



 Klaus


 ___
 vdr mailing list
 vdr@linuxtv.org
 http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

2009-03-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 06.03.2009 15:37, Alex Betis wrote:
 
 On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Klaus Schmidinger
 klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de mailto:klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote:
 
 On 03.03.2009 22:23, Gregoire Favre wrote:
  Hello,
 
  just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which
  fails if I don't use this :
 
  --- vdr.c~  2009-01-18 12:02:37.0 +0100
  +++ vdr.c   2009-03-03 22:17:49.0 +0100
  @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
   #include pwd.h
   #include signal.h
   #include stdlib.h
  +#include linux/types.h
   #include sys/capability.h
   #include sys/prctl.h
   #include termios.h
 
 vdr.c compiles just fine here with the most recent version of
 v4l-dvb from
 linuxtv.org http://linuxtv.org (6bd427caa0cb).
 
 I did report a problem with the driver's header files, though, in
 
  http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2009-March/031934.html
 
 However, there has been no repsonse to that, and the problem still
 persists with the current version.
 
 Just curious: don't you have a problem compiling dvbdevice.c?
 
 I've faced the same problem after upgrading kernel to 2.6.27.19
 
 Found the solution on the net: add the following to VDR Makefile:
 DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES

Let's be careful to not mix up two different things here.
There's apparently the problem Gregoire reported, which he solved by
adding an #include, but which doesn't happen here (kernel 2.6.25.20).
That one has nothing to do with the driver.

@Gregoire: does this happen with plain vanilla VDR 1.7.4 or are there
any patches involved?
Can you compile dvbdevice.c with the latest driver header files?

@Alex: are you referring to the problem Gregoire reported or to the
one I reported?

Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

2009-03-06 Thread Alex Betis
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Klaus Schmidinger 
klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de wrote:

 On 06.03.2009 15:37, Alex Betis wrote:
 
  On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Klaus Schmidinger
  klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de mailto:klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de
 wrote:
 
  On 03.03.2009 22:23, Gregoire Favre wrote:
   Hello,
  
   just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which
   fails if I don't use this :
  
   --- vdr.c~  2009-01-18 12:02:37.0 +0100
   +++ vdr.c   2009-03-03 22:17:49.0 +0100
   @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
#include pwd.h
#include signal.h
#include stdlib.h
   +#include linux/types.h
#include sys/capability.h
#include sys/prctl.h
#include termios.h
 
  vdr.c compiles just fine here with the most recent version of
  v4l-dvb from
  linuxtv.org http://linuxtv.org (6bd427caa0cb).
 
  I did report a problem with the driver's header files, though, in
 
   http://linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2009-March/031934.html
 
  However, there has been no repsonse to that, and the problem still
  persists with the current version.
 
  Just curious: don't you have a problem compiling dvbdevice.c?
 
  I've faced the same problem after upgrading kernel to 2.6.27.19
 
  Found the solution on the net: add the following to VDR Makefile:
  DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES

 Let's be careful to not mix up two different things here.
 There's apparently the problem Gregoire reported, which he solved by
 adding an #include, but which doesn't happen here (kernel 2.6.25.20).
 That one has nothing to do with the driver.

 @Gregoire: does this happen with plain vanilla VDR 1.7.4 or are there
 any patches involved?
 Can you compile dvbdevice.c with the latest driver header files?

 @Alex: are you referring to the problem Gregoire reported or to the
 one I reported?

I refer to your problem with many redefinitions like the following:

/usr/include/sys/select.h:78: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef
struct fd_set fd_set'
/usr/include/linux/types.h:12: error: 'fd_set' has a previous
declaration as 'typedef struct __kernel_fd_set fd_set'


I probably missed Gregorie's error report, so I don't know what was it
about.



 Klaus

 ___
 vdr mailing list
 vdr@linuxtv.org
 http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

2009-03-06 Thread Gregoire Favre
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:52:03PM +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:

 Let's be careful to not mix up two different things here.
 There's apparently the problem Gregoire reported, which he solved by
 adding an #include, but which doesn't happen here (kernel 2.6.25.20).
 That one has nothing to do with the driver.
 
 @Gregoire: does this happen with plain vanilla VDR 1.7.4 or are there
 any patches involved?

If I remember right I got the same problem with plain vanille 1.7.4 but
right now I use : 

-rw-r--r--  1 greg greg  23K 2009-01-26 00:34 p1-1.7.4-hlcutter-0.2.1.diff
-rw-r--r--  1 greg greg  50K 2009-01-25 23:23 p1-1.7.4-liemikuutio-1.23.diff
-rw-r--r--  1 greg greg 1.6K 2009-01-26 00:44 p1-cuttime-vdr-1.7.3.diff

 Can you compile dvbdevice.c with the latest driver header files?

My fix is just a little hack, I am not a real programmer, and yes I can
compil the whole VDR (didn't take the time to fix graphlcd). 

My kernel is 2.6.28-gentoo-r2 but if I remenber right I didn't had this
error with previous kernel).

Thank for VDR ;-)
-- 
Grégoire FAVRE http://gregoire.favre.googlepages.com http://www.gnupg.org
   http://picasaweb.google.com/Gregoire.Favre

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

2009-03-04 Thread Sébastien Serra
Hi,

I've recently had a problem too. I resolved it like that (i don't know if
the compilation error was the same as mine...) :

Add this line to the Makefile of VDR :

DEFINES += -D_GNU_SOURCE
*+DEFINES += -D__KERNEL_STRICT_NAMES
*
DEFINES += -DVIDEODIR=\$(VIDEODIR)\

Cheers.

2009/3/3 Gregoire Favre gregoire.fa...@gmail.com

 Hello,

 just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which
 fails if I don't use this :

 --- vdr.c~  2009-01-18 12:02:37.0 +0100
 +++ vdr.c   2009-03-03 22:17:49.0 +0100
 @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
  #include pwd.h
  #include signal.h
  #include stdlib.h
 +#include linux/types.h
  #include sys/capability.h
  #include sys/prctl.h
  #include termios.h

 Happy VDR :-)
 --
 Grégoire FAVRE http://gregoire.favre.googlepages.com http://www.gnupg.org
   http://picasaweb.google.com/Gregoire.Favre

 ___
 vdr mailing list
 vdr@linuxtv.org
 http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


[vdr] [patch] compil vdr-1.7.4 against v4l-dvb hg as of today

2009-03-03 Thread Gregoire Favre
Hello,

just tried compiling vdr-1.7.4 against my v4l-dvb hg's source which
fails if I don't use this :

--- vdr.c~  2009-01-18 12:02:37.0 +0100
+++ vdr.c   2009-03-03 22:17:49.0 +0100
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
 #include pwd.h
 #include signal.h
 #include stdlib.h
+#include linux/types.h
 #include sys/capability.h
 #include sys/prctl.h
 #include termios.h

Happy VDR :-)
-- 
Grégoire FAVRE http://gregoire.favre.googlepages.com http://www.gnupg.org
   http://picasaweb.google.com/Gregoire.Favre

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr