Re: [vdr] Kernels oops with PCTV nanostick 290e

2014-11-08 Thread Richard F

Mikko - thanks.

I built kernel 3.4, then moved onto 3.12 and both work well with this 
receiver.


FYI I had some trouble getting the right tuning parameters for DVB-T2 
with w_scan which I've used for a long time, and went back to dvbscan. I 
was getting the wrong SID I think - no EPG data received for some 
channels. The UK-Crystal palace initial tuning file is out of date, here 
is the one I made that worked for me, not sure all the other params, are 
right but the frequency list seems to be the important thing. The last 2 
are DVB-T2.


T 48200 8MHz  2/3 NONEQAM64   2k 1/32 NONE# London.
T 49000 8MHz  2/3 NONEQAM64   2k 1/32 NONE# London.
T 50600 8MHz  3/4 NONEQAM64   2k 1/32 NONE# London.
T 51400 8MHz  3/4 NONEQAM64   2k 1/32 NONE# London.
T 52983 8MHz  3/4 NONEQAM64   2k 1/32 NONE# London.
T 53800 8MHz  3/4 NONEQAM64   2k 1/32 NONE# London.
T 54583 8MHz AUTO AUTO   QAM256 AUTO AUTO AUTO# London.
T 57000 8MHz AUTO AUTO   QAM256 AUTO AUTO AUTO# London.


On 4/11/2014 11:00, vdr-requ...@linuxtv.org wrote:
There have been some fixes to the nanostick driver after 3.0. If you 
are not sure that they have been backported to 3.0, try 3.3 or later.


https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/9139/



___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] Kernels oops with PCTV nanostick 290e

2014-11-03 Thread Mikko Tuumanen

Moving from VDR 1.6 to 2.06 for HD (DVB-T2) and seeing regular kernel oops w
ith the PCTV nanostick 290e when using DVB-T2.



The kernel is 3.0.76 (SLES 11 SP3)


There have been some fixes to the nanostick driver after 3.0. If you are 
not sure that they have been backported to 3.0, try 3.3 or later.


https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/9139/


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr