On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Rene linu...@hertell.com wrote:
Also a nice thing to have is a way of watching the saved
livebuffer-files. Now it get´s saved into /video/LiveBuffer, and vdr
does not see this. Maybe it could be saved into a subdirectory like
VDR User wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Rene linu...@hertell.com wrote:
Also a nice thing to have is a way of watching the saved
livebuffer-files. Now it get´s saved into /video/LiveBuffer, and vdr
does not see this. Maybe it could be saved into a subdirectory like
VDR User wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Rene linu...@hertell.com wrote:
Also a nice thing to have is a way of watching the saved
livebuffer-files. Now it get´s saved into /video/LiveBuffer, and vdr
does not see this. Maybe it could be saved into a subdirectory like
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:30:55 +0200
Rene Hertell linu...@hertell.com wrote:
Tony Houghton wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:50:42 -0800
But I wonder, does writing to the HD really shorten its life
significantly compared to constant spinning or frequently being spun up
and down?
Yes, i guess
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 19:15 +, Tony Houghton wrote:
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:30:55 +0200
Rene Hertell linu...@hertell.com wrote:
Tony Houghton wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:50:42 -0800
But I wonder, does writing to the HD really shorten its life
significantly compared to constant
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:32:02 +
Gavin Hamill g...@acentral.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 19:15 +, Tony Houghton wrote:
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:30:55 +0200
Rene Hertell linu...@hertell.com wrote:
Tony Houghton wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:50:42 -0800
But I wonder,
