On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Halim Sahin wrote:
> Hi,
> The media_build repo contains only backported drivers.
> Are you sure that the new api changes were backported?
The media_build repo is a daily snapshot of what you'd get with
media_tree (minus the kernel source itself).
___
Hi,
The media_build repo contains only backported drivers.
Are you sure that the new api changes were backported?
The mainstream development happens in media_tree only, which contains a
complete kernel snapshot.
HTH.
Halim
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linu
Hi,
Am 23.01.2012 05:43, schrieb Hawes, Mark:
I have updated my current build taken from the Media Build Tree last Tuesday
with the contents of the linux media tarball dated 22/01/2012 and rebuilt my
drivers.
I still get the same results.
As the system initialises the following lines appear in
om: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] On Behalf Of
Steffen Barszus
Sent: Wednesday, 18 January 2012 5:47 PM
To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.23
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:58:16 +1100
"Hawes, Mark" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
:
> From: Stuart Morris
> Subject: Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.23
> To: "VDR Mailing List"
> Date: Sunday, 22 January, 2012, 14:50
> Thanks
> I pointed Make.config to the media_build/linux directory
> and built that way.
> I'm surprised b
Thanks
I pointed Make.config to the media_build/linux directory and built that way.
I'm surprised because I fully expected the media_build script to install the
headers to.
--- On Sun, 22/1/12, Ian Bates wrote:
> From: Ian Bates
> Subject: Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer ver
as gone wrong here?
> Thanks
>
>
> --- On Sun, 15/1/12, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>
>> From: Klaus Schmidinger
>> Subject: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.23
>> To: vdr@linuxtv.org
>> Date: Sunday, 15 January, 2012, 15:10
>> VDR develo
/version.h reports version 5.2 and the date of the file
is old, meaning it was not updated when the drivers were updated.
Can anybody explain what has gone wrong here?
Thanks
--- On Sun, 15/1/12, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> From: Klaus Schmidinger
> Subject: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer v
uary 2012 5:47 PM
To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.23
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:58:16 +1100
"Hawes, Mark" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tried using my hybrid HVR 4000 card ( DVB-S2 and DVB-T
> frontends on one adapter ) against 1.7.23 and a new s
g that there is not a bug)
>
> Regards,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] On
> Behalf Of Klaus Schmidinger Sent: Monday, 16 January 2012 2:11 AM
> To: vdr@linuxtv.org
> Subject: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR develop
as a
result of the 'Device or resource busy' result which is due to frontend 0 being
open on it.
Any suggestions:
Regards,
-Original Message-
From: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] On Behalf Of
Klaus Schmidinger
Sent: Monday, 16 January 2012 2:11 AM
VDR developer version 1.7.23 is now available at
ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.23.tar.bz2
A 'diff' against the previous version is available at
ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-1.7.22-1.7.23.diff
MD5 checksums:
de136f7be28c4b6f1fa0e2218b4acc11 vdr-1.7.23.tar.bz2
2977
12 matches
Mail list logo