Re: [vdr] HD recording size
On 19.05.2014 22:26, Karim wrote: On 11.05.2014 15:13, Karim wrote: On 08.05.2014 23:14, Martin wrote: I'm having a small problem. Some HD recordings are 1/2 in time of the SD recording. Not every HD recording has this problem, but most of the time I record from RTL HD it has. Recording is completed but only the length is wrong. So when I play it back and jump in time, I must jump 60 sec to skip 120 sec etc. VDR 2.1.1 but had the same problem with other versions. Is the problem still present in version 2.1.6? Klaus Hi, FYI, I noticed this behaviour here with vdr-2.0.6 and french HD channels. Karim Can you make a small sample (like a minute or so) of such a recording available? Klaus Of course. Please download sample from here : https://www.dropbox.com/sh/i9c732ukwl925md/AAC6J2H6RL6F5JIQNeouxPUIa I have tested this sample with both VDR 2.1.1 and 2.1.6, and in both cases 'vdr --genindex... creates an index file that is about twice the size of your file and thus appears to be correct. Was this sample taken from the very beginning of your recording or somewhere in the middle? Maybe the error is only caused by a specific sequence in the stream, which is not contained in the sample. If you can produce a sample where vdr's --genindex option generates a faulty index file, please let me know. Klaus I think that sample is from very beginning, what I am not totally sure. I will try to check again. Could you please tell me how I can detect a faulty index ? If you encounter a recording where the time shown in the progress display is not correct, the index is most likely wrong. In such a case please do as follows: - change into the *.rec directory of that recording - rename the file index to index.old (or whatever you like) - run the command vdr --genindex=`pwd` (`pwd` will be replaced by the name of the current directory) - do an ls -l index* and compare the size of the old and new index file. If they are the same, that means that --genindex produces the same index file as did the original recording, and thus I should be able to reproduce the problem here if you send me the first minute of that recording. Klaus ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] HD recording size
Hi, FYI, I noticed this behaviour here with vdr-2.0.6 and french HD channels. Karim Can you make a small sample (like a minute or so) of such a recording available? Klaus Of course. Please download sample from here : https://www.dropbox.com/sh/i9c732ukwl925md/AAC6J2H6RL6F5JIQNeouxPUIa I have tested this sample with both VDR 2.1.1 and 2.1.6, and in both cases 'vdr --genindex... creates an index file that is about twice the size of your file and thus appears to be correct. Was this sample taken from the very beginning of your recording or somewhere in the middle? Maybe the error is only caused by a specific sequence in the stream, which is not contained in the sample. If you can produce a sample where vdr's --genindex option generates a faulty index file, please let me know. Klaus I think that sample is from very beginning, what I am not totally sure. I will try to check again. Could you please tell me how I can detect a faulty index ? If you encounter a recording where the time shown in the progress display is not correct, the index is most likely wrong. In such a case please do as follows: - change into the *.rec directory of that recording - rename the file index to index.old (or whatever you like) - run the command vdr --genindex=`pwd` (`pwd` will be replaced by the name of the current directory) - do an ls -l index* and compare the size of the old and new index file. If they are the same, that means that --genindex produces the same index file as did the original recording, and thus I should be able to reproduce the problem here if you send me the first minute of that recording. Klaus It's clear, thank you. Karim ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] HD recording size
On 11.05.2014 15:13, Karim wrote: On 08.05.2014 23:14, Martin wrote: I'm having a small problem. Some HD recordings are 1/2 in time of the SD recording. Not every HD recording has this problem, but most of the time I record from RTL HD it has. Recording is completed but only the length is wrong. So when I play it back and jump in time, I must jump 60 sec to skip 120 sec etc. VDR 2.1.1 but had the same problem with other versions. Is the problem still present in version 2.1.6? Klaus Hi, FYI, I noticed this behaviour here with vdr-2.0.6 and french HD channels. Karim Can you make a small sample (like a minute or so) of such a recording available? Klaus Of course. Please download sample from here : https://www.dropbox.com/sh/i9c732ukwl925md/AAC6J2H6RL6F5JIQNeouxPUIa I have tested this sample with both VDR 2.1.1 and 2.1.6, and in both cases 'vdr --genindex... creates an index file that is about twice the size of your file and thus appears to be correct. Was this sample taken from the very beginning of your recording or somewhere in the middle? Maybe the error is only caused by a specific sequence in the stream, which is not contained in the sample. If you can produce a sample where vdr's --genindex option generates a faulty index file, please let me know. Klaus I think that sample is from very beginning, what I am not totally sure. I will try to check again. Could you please tell me how I can detect a faulty index ? Thank you. Karim ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] HD recording size
On 11.05.2014 15:13, Karim wrote: On 08.05.2014 23:14, Martin wrote: I'm having a small problem. Some HD recordings are 1/2 in time of the SD recording. Not every HD recording has this problem, but most of the time I record from RTL HD it has. Recording is completed but only the length is wrong. So when I play it back and jump in time, I must jump 60 sec to skip 120 sec etc. VDR 2.1.1 but had the same problem with other versions. Is the problem still present in version 2.1.6? Klaus Hi, FYI, I noticed this behaviour here with vdr-2.0.6 and french HD channels. Karim Can you make a small sample (like a minute or so) of such a recording available? Klaus Of course. Please download sample from here : https://www.dropbox.com/sh/i9c732ukwl925md/AAC6J2H6RL6F5JIQNeouxPUIa I have tested this sample with both VDR 2.1.1 and 2.1.6, and in both cases 'vdr --genindex... creates an index file that is about twice the size of your file and thus appears to be correct. Was this sample taken from the very beginning of your recording or somewhere in the middle? Maybe the error is only caused by a specific sequence in the stream, which is not contained in the sample. If you can produce a sample where vdr's --genindex option generates a faulty index file, please let me know. Klaus ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] HD recording size
On 10.05.2014 19:25, Karim wrote: On 08.05.2014 23:14, Martin wrote: I'm having a small problem. Some HD recordings are 1/2 in time of the SD recording. Not every HD recording has this problem, but most of the time I record from RTL HD it has. Recording is completed but only the length is wrong. So when I play it back and jump in time, I must jump 60 sec to skip 120 sec etc. VDR 2.1.1 but had the same problem with other versions. Is the problem still present in version 2.1.6? Klaus Hi, FYI, I noticed this behaviour here with vdr-2.0.6 and french HD channels. Can you make a small sample (like a minute or so) of such a recording available? Klaus ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] HD recording size
On 08.05.2014 23:14, Martin wrote: I'm having a small problem. Some HD recordings are 1/2 in time of the SD recording. Not every HD recording has this problem, but most of the time I record from RTL HD it has. Recording is completed but only the length is wrong. So when I play it back and jump in time, I must jump 60 sec to skip 120 sec etc. VDR 2.1.1 but had the same problem with other versions. Is the problem still present in version 2.1.6? Klaus Hi, FYI, I noticed this behaviour here with vdr-2.0.6 and french HD channels. Karim Can you make a small sample (like a minute or so) of such a recording available? Klaus Of course. Please download sample from here : https://www.dropbox.com/sh/i9c732ukwl925md/AAC6J2H6RL6F5JIQNeouxPUIa Regards. Karim ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] HD recording size
On 08.05.2014 23:14, Martin wrote: I'm having a small problem. Some HD recordings are 1/2 in time of the SD recording. Not every HD recording has this problem, but most of the time I record from RTL HD it has. Recording is completed but only the length is wrong. So when I play it back and jump in time, I must jump 60 sec to skip 120 sec etc. VDR 2.1.1 but had the same problem with other versions. Is the problem still present in version 2.1.6? Klaus Hi, FYI, I noticed this behaviour here with vdr-2.0.6 and french HD channels. Regards. Karim ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] HD recording size
On 08.05.2014 23:14, Martin wrote: I'm having a small problem. Some HD recordings are 1/2 in time of the SD recording. Not every HD recording has this problem, but most of the time I record from RTL HD it has. Recording is completed but only the length is wrong. So when I play it back and jump in time, I must jump 60 sec to skip 120 sec etc. VDR 2.1.1 but had the same problem with other versions. Is the problem still present in version 2.1.6? Klaus ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] HD recording size
I tried to compile vdr 2.1.6, it compiles with warnings but doesn't like my settings files. channels.conf, diseqc.conf etc So I can't test it with 2.1.6. g++ -g -O3 -Wall -Wno-parentheses -fPIC -c -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DREMOTE_KBD -DLIRC_DEVICE=\/var/run/lirc/lircd\ -DVIDEODIR=\/srv/vdr/video\ -DCONFDIR=\/var/lib/vdr\ -DCACHEDIR=\/var/cache/vdr\ -DRESDIR=\/usr/local/share/vdr\ -DPLUGINDIR=\/mnt/hdb1/vdr/t/vdr-2.1.6/PLUGINS/lib\ -DLOCDIR=\/mnt/hdb1/vdr/t/vdr-2.1.6/locale\ -I/usr/include/freetype2 -o channels.o channels.c channels.c: In static member function ‘static tChannelID tChannelID::FromString(const char*)’: channels.c:32: warning: unknown conversion type character ‘m’ in format channels.c:32: warning: format ‘%d’ expects type ‘int*’, but argument 3 has type ‘char**’ channels.c:32: warning: too many arguments for format channels.c: In member function ‘bool cChannel::Parse(const char*)’: channels.c:598: warning: unknown conversion type character ‘m’ in format channels.c:598: warning: format ‘%d’ expects type ‘int*’, but argument 3 has type ‘char**’ ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
Re: [vdr] HD recording size
Reverted the change : Changed '%a' to the POSIX compliant '%m' in all scanf() calls Now it compiles and can read the config files. HD Recording test will start soon. ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
[vdr] HD recording size
I'm having a small problem. Some HD recordings are 1/2 in time of the SD recording. Not every HD recording has this problem, but most of the time I record from RTL HD it has. Recording is completed but only the length is wrong. So when I play it back and jump in time, I must jump 60 sec to skip 120 sec etc. VDR 2.1.1 but had the same problem with other versions. Greetz from Holland, Martin ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
