On 01 Feb 2007 Reinhard Nissl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heikki Manninen wrote:
I've noticed that earlier when I was using PIII 550 MHz and vdr 1.3.22
(or something about) I made a test by recording nine channels
simultaneously and watching a recording at the same time. I remember
there
Stefan Huelswitt kirjoitti:
On 01 Feb 2007 Reinhard Nissl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heikki Manninen wrote:
I've noticed that earlier when I was using PIII 550 MHz and vdr 1.3.22
(or something about) I made a test by recording nine channels
simultaneously and watching a recording at
Kartsa schrieb:
Stefan Huelswitt kirjoitti:
On 01 Feb 2007 Reinhard Nissl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heikki Manninen wrote:
I've noticed that earlier when I was using PIII 550 MHz and vdr
1.3.22 (or something about) I made a test by recording nine
channels simultaneously and
Kartsa kirjoitti:
Kartsa kirjoitti:
Marko Mäkelä kirjoitti:
In any case, you could profile the old and new version of vdr and
see if
there is any obvious difference.
I'll have to take that into consideration. I'll have to download the
old version and all that :)
I was unsuccesfull
hi,
Seppo Ingalsuo writes:
Jouni Karvo wrote:
Earlier I had an ATI GFX card and used XV (with xine) for playback,
and had not this problem. After switching to nVidia GeForce FX 5200,
it started.
I wonder if this would help in xorg.conf Device section
Option UseEvents
Jouni Karvo wrote:
Earlier I had an ATI GFX card and used XV (with xine) for playback,
and had not this problem. After switching to nVidia GeForce FX 5200,
it started.
I wonder if this would help in xorg.conf Device section
Option UseEvents True
(from
hi,
I have also currently the responsiveness problem. I have a P4 2.4GHz
which runs at aout 20% load, so it should not be a performance problem.
Currently home-made lirc, vdr-xine and 1.4.1 (and that's why I haven't
reported before you started complaining, as I have not had the energy
to
Hi,
Jouni Karvo wrote:
I have also currently the responsiveness problem. I have a P4 2.4GHz
which runs at aout 20% load, so it should not be a performance problem.
Currently home-made lirc, vdr-xine and 1.4.1 (and that's why I haven't
reported before you started complaining, as I have not
hi,
Reinhard Nissl writes:
Are you using xine's video output driver xxmc?
yes, I am.
I experience deadlocks with this driver on either nVidia or Via EPIA
hardware. For example, when you replay a recording and press the pause
button: the pause symbol (OSD) will never appear on
Marko Myllymaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also this newer version does some weird busylooping or whatever from
time to time. Vdr gets all remote codes and buffers them, but just
starts executing them after ~45s. One time it took so long, that I
got ssh opened from other computer to restart vdr,
On Saturday 03 February 2007 10:13, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
Marko Myllymaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also this newer version does some weird busylooping or whatever from
time to time. Vdr gets all remote codes and buffers them, but just
starts executing them after ~45s. One time it took
Laz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 03 February 2007 10:13, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
Marko Myllymaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also this newer version does some weird busylooping or whatever
from time to time. Vdr gets all remote codes and buffers them,
but just starts
Clemens Kirchgatterer kirjoitti:
Laz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 03 February 2007 10:13, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
Marko Myllymaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also this newer version does some weird busylooping or whatever
from time to time. Vdr gets all remote codes
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Kartsa wrote:
Marko Mäkelä kirjoitti:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:18:03PM +0200, Kartsa wrote:
Would it really matter in this case when cpu load was that small? I was
just trying to say that even though there were almost no cpu load vdr was
working sluggish.
Without
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 04:05:10PM +0200, Marko Myllymaa wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Kartsa wrote:
Marko Mäkelä kirjoitti:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:18:03PM +0200, Kartsa wrote:
Would it really matter in this case when cpu load was that small? I was
just trying to say that even though
I've noticed that earlier when I was using PIII 550 MHz and vdr 1.3.22
(or something about) I made a test by recording nine channels
simultaneously and watching a recording at the same time. I remember
there seemed to be no trouble doing it. Now when I have vdr 1.4.4 after
fourth recording
On to, 2007-02-01 at 19:29 +0200, Kartsa wrote:
I've noticed that earlier when I was using PIII 550 MHz and vdr 1.3.22
(or something about) I made a test by recording nine channels
simultaneously and watching a recording at the same time. I remember
there seemed to be no trouble doing it.
Hi,
Heikki Manninen wrote:
I've noticed that earlier when I was using PIII 550 MHz and vdr 1.3.22
(or something about) I made a test by recording nine channels
simultaneously and watching a recording at the same time. I remember
there seemed to be no trouble doing it. Now when I have vdr
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:49:55PM +0200, Kartsa wrote:
Most likely, it's me who has to be blamed. Around 1.3.27, cVideoRepacker
was introduced which has an impact on CPU load. This could be a reason
why the menu is slow when running several recordings at the same time.
Bye.
I do not
Reinhard Nissl kirjoitti:
Hi,
Heikki Manninen wrote:
I've noticed that earlier when I was using PIII 550 MHz and vdr 1.3.22
(or something about) I made a test by recording nine channels
simultaneously and watching a recording at the same time. I remember
there seemed to be no trouble
Marko Mäkelä kirjoitti:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:49:55PM +0200, Kartsa wrote:
Most likely, it's me who has to be blamed. Around 1.3.27, cVideoRepacker
was introduced which has an impact on CPU load. This could be a reason
why the menu is slow when running several recordings at the same
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:18:03PM +0200, Kartsa wrote:
Marko Mäkelä kirjoitti:
I do not think that it is the reason. I checked that the cpu load was
less than 10% on my 3000+ AMD and even with my 550MHz PIII less than 20%
when there were 5 simultaneuous recordings.
You should
Marko Mäkelä kirjoitti:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:18:03PM +0200, Kartsa wrote:
Would it really matter in this case when cpu load was that small? I was
just trying to say that even though there were almost no cpu load vdr
was working sluggish.
Without trying it, it is hard to say.
23 matches
Mail list logo
