Re: [vdr] new support

2010-01-23 Thread abbe normal
hello rob thanks for the info i will be trying this today so ill email back later on how it works out... as far as the bandwidth i have 100 now can move to 1000 just have to put the switch in but never noticed if there was a slow down as ive not had this up and running full time yet... abbe On

Re: [vdr] new support

2010-01-22 Thread Rolf Ahrenberg
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Rob Davis wrote: Can you get the channel scan done from something else and post a mplayer or vlc command for each channel. Once you've done that I'll knock you up a quick iptv script.. You really should consider write a new plugin (i.e. based on the iptv plugin) for it

Re: [vdr] new support

2010-01-22 Thread Lars Bläser
abbe normal wrote: hello klaus there is open-source software for a tuner called hdhomerun if you had this info could native support be added to vdr... this is a network device and it has support in other pvr dvr setups.. just asking as i know there is a europe model of this device... or

Re: [vdr] new support

2010-01-22 Thread abbe normal
hello guys lars that looks like a nice setup that real media has didnt even know that was around... rolf yes that i think maybe is the best idea but as like i said i dont even know where to start as i have never made a plugin before... i can write very simple scripts but this is going to need

Re: [vdr] new support

2010-01-22 Thread Georg Acher
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:25:07AM -0500, abbe normal wrote: hello guys lars that looks like a nice setup that real media has didnt even know that was around... There's a more detailed description of the system here: http://www.baycom.de/~acher/netceiver/netceiver_white_paper.pdf --

Re: [vdr] new support

2010-01-22 Thread Rob Davis
abbe normal ha scritto: rob yes they do have there own channel scanner built into there software and it produces a simple layout of info... i will attach a txt file of that output... so you can have a look at it... thanks guys for all the input think this will work and be smooth working with

Re: [vdr] new support

2010-01-21 Thread Rolf Ahrenberg
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Nicolas Huillard wrote: For those who don't spare some time digging on the website: * this is an Ethernet device: antenna in (single, dual), ethernet out * no storage inside the box * they provide an LGPL library libhdhomerun: include hdhomerun.h and/or hdhomerun_device.h

Re: [vdr] new support

2010-01-21 Thread Rob Davis
On 21/01/10 04:20, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Nicolas Huillard wrote: For those who don't spare some time digging on the website: * this is an Ethernet device: antenna in (single, dual), ethernet out * no storage inside the box * they provide an LGPL library libhdhomerun:

Re: [vdr] new support

2010-01-21 Thread Nicolas Huillard
Le jeudi 21 janvier 2010 à 09:27 -0600, Rob Davis a écrit : More native support could be good.. However, I wonder what the advantage would be to having this over an internal pci dvb card or even a usb one? The pci card is surely cheaper, and the functionality is already there in VDR? It may

Re: [vdr] new support

2010-01-21 Thread Rob Davis
On 21/01/10 15:39, abbe normal wrote: hello guys yes you are right a pci or usb device may be cheaper but in my case at 99 dollars each for usb and 108 dollars for pci didnt make since but in the thought of less pci buses on systems now was a big factor... then you have to double that cost