Lauri Tischler wrote:
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 06/12/07 18:02, Oliver Joa wrote:
Hi,
i use vdr since a long time, i still use version 1.3.23 on 3 Computers.
The last months/years i did not follow the development. Is there already
a solution for the client-server Problem? I wonder if it
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:02:29 +0200, Oliver Joa wrote
i use vdr since a long time, i still use version 1.3.23 on 3 Computers.
The last months/years i did not follow the development. Is there already
a solution for the client-server Problem? I wonder if it is possible
to have 1 server recording
Richard Scobie wrote:
Andrew Herron wrote:
So the data must be there somewhere ;-)
Is it possible that this feature is part of the MHEG5 component of the
Freeview service?
that is quite possible.
if this is the case then as far as I'm aware we're boned. :(
Cheers,
Alex
Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2007 11:23 schrieb Marius Heidenstecker:
I do use a FAT32 external USB-HDD on which I store VDR-recordings with the
VFAT-option enabled. That way I can take VDR-recordings on that HDD to
friends' Windows boxes and watch it there with VLC for example. So I'd like
to keep
Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2007 13:39 schrieb Pertti Kosunen:
Oleg Roitburd wrote:
Sorry ... I don't understand and can't find any sence.
If you export for window, you make this with SAMBA. And you can
configure share with UTF-8
Yes you can use Samba and UTF-8, but some characters are still
On 06/13/2007 03:27 PM, Oleg Roitburd wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2007 11:23 schrieb Marius Heidenstecker:
I do use a FAT32 external USB-HDD on which I store VDR-recordings with the
VFAT-option enabled. That way I can take VDR-recordings on that HDD to
friends' Windows boxes and watch it
On 6/13/07, Pertti Kosunen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oleg Roitburd wrote:
As maintainer of ArVDR ( VDR distribution for Russian user) I would say,
that
in 1.5 years as we use UTF-8 patch without VFAT part, I havn't heard any
complaints about this issue.
touch 'foo:bar'
And dir in Windows
On Wednesday 13 Jun 2007, Andrew Herron wrote:
Hi,
My understanding is that the updated epg data has been transmitted here
in the uK across all dvb-t mux's since about March/April. Not all
channels may have completely updated there backend systems yet but all
the major channels have done so.
On 09/06/07, Petri Hintukainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 18:15 +0100, Andrew Herron wrote:
I have several networked vdr machines that i want to use to connect
back to the 'server' vdr machine. The networked vdr machines will have
no dvb cards (they will all be located
2007/6/12, Klaus Schmidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I haven't had much time to look into this, yet,
but I believe the attached patch should be all it takes
to fix this.
It works here!
Regards,
Joachim.
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
Hi,
could somebody point me in right direction?
I am looking into configuring a second DVBS card to use with vdr.
Configuration:
Athlon 1.2GHz
MB: ABIT
Memory: 512MB
OS: Mandriva 2006
vdr: 1.4.5
DVBS1: Nexus-S
DVBS2: Twinhan 1025a
At this time I use Nexus-S and it works fine.
What
On 13/06/07, Andrey Vlassov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
could somebody point me in right direction?
lots of useful info here:
http://www.linuxtv.org/vdrwiki/index.php/Main_Page
I am looking into configuring a second DVBS card to use with vdr.
Configuration:
Athlon 1.2GHz
MB: ABIT
On 06/13/07 22:55, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
On 13/06/07, Andrey Vlassov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
What modification/patches will require to make both cards work with vdr?
Is there any documentation for this case?
As far as I know, once you've confirmed both cards are being
recognized and
On 13/06/07, Klaus Schmidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no such option in VDR's Setup menu.
Sorry, I was thinking of Primary DVB interface - something totally different..
--
A l a s d a i r C a m p b e l l
r a g a w u @ g m a i l . c o m
Ok, after much testing Stefan's patch frequently aborts mplayer
playback when a timer is triggered while Anssi's doesn't. I don't
know why this is if both patches are essentially doing the same thing
during the same time. Something must be different to give different
results.
At any rate,
On Thursday 14 Jun 2007, Andrew Herron wrote:
The document we need to look at is the one that specifies how to process
Event Information (AKA EPG) and is called
ETSI EN 300 468. The latest one is found here;
http://webapp.etsi.org/action/OP/OP20060428/en_300468v010701o.pdf
It looks like
16 matches
Mail list logo
