Georg Acher schrieb
[ ... snip ... ]
Well, you don't have to buy the card if you would wake up in cold sweat
every once in a while because of the small binary-only part in the kernel.
But IMO you can wait until the end of time for a full open source HDTV card
with HDMI output. If you have the
Brendon Higgins wrote:
Jun 30 21:12:55 phi vdr: [3452] frontend 0 timed out while tuning to channel
0, tp 536
I'm a bit confused that it's
trying to access channel 0, since AFAICT there is *no* channel 0.
'Channel 0' is usually the scan for new channels on currently unused
transponders.
Hi,
Oliver Endriss wrote:
Are there any FTA NTSC transmissions on Astra 19.2°
or Eutelsat 13°? I'd like to do some tests...
Pentagon Channel:11095:hC34:S13.0E:28000:810:800,802,804:0:0:8:6:301:0
Bye.
--
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Georg Acher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From a technical view this is right, but with just a component output
you can't sell a HDTV decoder card nowadays. And HDMI is not only
about encryption but also contains audio encapsulation. And that is
an argument for HDMI vs. DVI...
true.
HDCP on a
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:34:14AM +0200, Steffen Barszus wrote:
Another thing: Will it have a proper framebuffer ? I mean the main
problem of the current FF cards is that you can't do a lot of things
because of the very limited OSD. ScumVM etc pp would be a really nice
thing.
The OSD
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:33:39PM +0200, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
because that means they get an stable and well performing OS at zero
cost for their embedded designes what makes these chips sell better.
So what? Wasn't it idea of free Software to get it without paying for
it?
Marco Schlüßler has sent me the attached patch that fixes a
buffer overflow in initializing VDR's character table.
Since I'll be away from home for another two weeks and this
might be a problem for others, too, I'm posting it here before
the next official developer version.
Klaus
diff -bur
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:33:21PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
That doesn't matter. It's still Linux-based and you still need to release the
modified sources (I'd say enough to allow the building of a complete
filesystem image for the device).
To make it clear: This whole argument is *ONLY*
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, JJussi wrote:
So, is there real solution to this missing subtitles at recorded program
problem?
The vdr-1.5.2-spids patch? It enables VDR's core to handle subtitling
pids internally and remuxes them into recordings as subtitles patch does
for backwards compatibility.
On Saturday 30 June 2007 23:21:29 Torgeir Veimo wrote:
I just upgraded to vdr 1.5.5 and now the colour buttons on the remote
doesn't work anymore when there's no OSD. If I press the menu button
first they work.
Is there a new setting that can have this effect?
Hmm, my keymacros.conf for the
I demand that Georg Acher may or may not have written...
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:33:21PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
That doesn't matter. It's still Linux-based and you still need to release
the modified sources (I'd say enough to allow the building of a complete
filesystem image for the
On 1 Jul 2007, at 15:54, Stefan Taferner wrote:
On Saturday 30 June 2007 23:21:29 Torgeir Veimo wrote:
I just upgraded to vdr 1.5.5 and now the colour buttons on the remote
doesn't work anymore when there's no OSD. If I press the menu button
first they work.
Is there a new setting that can
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 03:55:04PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
I demand that Georg Acher may or may not have written...
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 02:33:21PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
That doesn't matter. It's still Linux-based and you still need to release
the modified sources (I'd say enough
Georg Acher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's not. Free is free, you can't make differences between
hardware vendors using Linux as a basis for their HW and SW vendors
using Linux as an OS for their SW. And that's exactly the intention
of your wording (zero cost).
strange interpretation of
On 01.07.2007 19:40, Georg Acher wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:47:18PM +0200, Clemens Kirchgatterer wrote:
or better or whatever. cool, no problem. what? you signed a NDA that
does not allow you distribute the os in the first place? your bad.
Once again, and now in capitals.
IT'S
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:43:04PM +0200, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
If only the hardware vendors where as united as the movie-industry.
HDCP was invented by Intel, Silicon Image holds a lot of patents on DVI and
HDMI. As long as they can sell chips and licenses, they don't care about the
I demand that Georg Acher may or may not have written...
[snip]
And quite frankly, the dumb consumer doesn't care about HDCP and its
implications. Compared to DRM on music, HDCP is invisible to him, he has no
visible disadvantage.
That's as may be... however, it does seem to be ignoring those
On 01.07.2007 21:10, Georg Acher wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:43:04PM +0200, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
If only the hardware vendors where as united as the movie-industry.
HDCP was invented by Intel, Silicon Image holds a lot of patents on DVI and
HDMI. As long as they can sell
ok. Thanks for clarifying that.
On 7/1/07, Rolf Ahrenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Andrew Herron wrote:
Sorry to jump in here... so does the vdr-1.5.2-spids patch mean that the
subtitles patch plugin are no longer needed?
No, the subtitles patch and plugin are still
19 matches
Mail list logo