On Sun, 3 May 2009, Tomas Berglund wrote:
Do you mean aspect ratio 2.21:1 ?
+const char *VideoAspectString[] = { 4:3,
+16:9,
+2.21:9
+ };
Besides of that typo, there're plenty of video
On 05/03/09 10:06, marti...@embl.de wrote:
Using VDR 1.7.6
1) On 7 East, there are hannels with two audio shown as TUR, and ORJ
(Tur for Turkish and Orj for original language) Default audio is Tur and
in
the
OSD settings it is not possible to give Orj a higher priority as it is no
t in
the
Quoting marti...@embl.de:
Also one little thing that is driving me crazy.
My 3 years old daughter presses accidentally the Pause button and starts al
l
sort of instant recordings silenty, my wife then complains vdr is broken
because she can´t change channels.
What I am asking for is for
Rolf Ahrenberg a écrit :
On Sun, 3 May 2009, Tomas Berglund wrote:
Do you mean aspect ratio 2.21:1 ?
+const char *VideoAspectString[] = { 4:3,
+16:9,
+2.21:9
+ };
Besides of that
On Mon, 4 May 2009, Nicolas Huillard wrote:
Rolf Ahrenberg a écrit :
On Sun, 3 May 2009, Tomas Berglund wrote:
Do you mean aspect ratio 2.21:1 ?
+const char *VideoAspectString[] = { 4:3,
+16:9,
+2.21:9
+
On Mon, 4 May 2009, Falk Spitzberg wrote:
The OSD should adopt to the size of the video material. If that is
scaled to some non TV screen size, the OSD is scaled by the same factor.
I still disagree. If you scale down your OSD to video resolution (i.e.
544x576) and afterwards scale up the
and what about anamorphic material?
A 16:9 SD broadcast in fact still is 4:3 but is streached by the TV to
16:9 to look ok (no egg-heads).
Wouldn't it be correct also to draw the OSD anamorphic so that is not
screached by the TV?
Did you get the point? It's somehow difficult to describe this
Off-topic question:
Are there any (free) EDID binary data editors available that are able to
edit the CEA block
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EDID#Extension_Block_Details ?
I'd like to disable 1080i modes from my EDID via CustomEDID option to
avoid Nvidia drivers to use them as back-end
Am Montag, den 04.05.2009, 14:13 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Huillard:
Rolf Ahrenberg a écrit :
On Sun, 3 May 2009, Tomas Berglund wrote:
Do you mean aspect ratio 2.21:1 ?
+const char *VideoAspectString[] = { 4:3,
+16:9,
+
On 03.05.2009 23:09, Tomas Berglund wrote:
Do you mean aspect ratio 2.21:1 ?
+const char *VideoAspectString[] = { 4:3,
+16:9,
+2.21:9
+ };
Yes, sorry, was a typo.
Reinhard Nissl already
On 04.05.2009 08:00, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote:
On Sun, 3 May 2009, Tomas Berglund wrote:
Do you mean aspect ratio 2.21:1 ?
+const char *VideoAspectString[] = { 4:3,
+16:9,
+2.21:9
+ };
hi
the logo from xinelibout is distorted in the upper left corner.
so i make a patch witch is transparent and in korrect aspect
ratio.
see attached patch.
stefandiff -urNad vdr-plugin-xineliboutput-1.0.0~rc2~/vdrlogo_32x32.c vdr-plugin-xineliboutput-1.0.0~rc2/vdrlogo_32x32.c
---
Matthias Becker a écrit :
and what about anamorphic material?
A 16:9 SD broadcast in fact still is 4:3 but is streached by the TV to
16:9 to look ok (no egg-heads).
Wouldn't it be correct also to draw the OSD anamorphic so that is not
screached by the TV?
Did you get the point? It's
I keep seeing mention of people using computer monitors and that VDR
should be designed to accommodate their aspect ratios. I'd like to
point out that plenty of users don't use VDR with a computer monitor
at all. Like many others, I have an hdtv (60 in my case) and would
love to have an osd that
Hello Joerg,
Am Sonntag, den 03.05.2009, 21:13 +0200 schrieb Joerg Bornkessel:
My 2 channels on TeleColumbus in Berlin are encrypted on my system.
Maybe this channels are filtered.
See inside xxv - Setting Channels FilterCA
Also, plz can you check the wml part for xxv mobile,
Please try
It's a pity, no answer.
I would like to note, that with vdr 1.7.7 is result same-NO video but audio is
OK.
Receiving these channels with sat boxes like dreambox or triple dragon is
without problem.
Thanks for any suggestions.
BR
Marky
-Original Message-
From: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org
On 04.05.2009 23:05, Marek Hajduk wrote:
It's a pity, no answer.
I would like to note, that with vdr 1.7.7 is result same-NO video but audio
is OK.
Receiving these channels with sat boxes like dreambox or triple dragon is
without problem.
'1' is not a known video stream type in VDR.
Try
On Monday 04 of May 2009, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 04.05.2009 23:05, Marek Hajduk wrote:
It's a pity, no answer.
I would like to note, that with vdr 1.7.7 is result same-NO video but
audio is OK. Receiving these channels with sat boxes like dreambox or
triple dragon is without problem.
Many Thanks, Klaus.
It works. I will try to record several seconds, because picture has
errors.
once again, thanks for help.
BR
Marky
Klaus Schmidinger píše v Po 04. 05. 2009 v 23:34 +0200:
On 04.05.2009 23:05, Marek Hajduk wrote:
It's a pity, no answer.
I would like to note, that with
19 matches
Mail list logo
