On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:21:18AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
you released version 0.1.0 [1]. Could you please explain to me, why the
framebuffer patches (intelfb, radeonfb) are not needed anymore?
since version 0.1.0 you will not need DRM from GIT anymore. You just can
use DRM as provided by
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:34:30AM +0200, Thomas Hilber wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:21:18AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
you released version 0.1.0 [1]. Could you please explain to me, why the
framebuffer patches (intelfb, radeonfb) are not needed anymore?
since version 0.1.0 you will
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:32:21PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Does Lenny have some extra patches in the kernel, or does it work with all
vanilla 2.6.26+ kernels?
for sure has Lenny some extra patches in the kernel. But probably
they don't interfere with the vga-sync-fields (FRC) patch. I
Dear Thomas,
you released version 0.1.0 [1]. Could you please explain to me, why the
framebuffer patches (intelfb, radeonfb) are not needed anymore?
Thanks a lot,
Paul
[1] http://lowbyte.de/vga-sync-fields/vga-sync-fields/
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter