Carsten Koch wrote:
But if they really cannot have readable names,
at least I would not provide a default, but let
the makefile issue a message that they must
be set (as I suggested in the other thread).
They don't have to be set, so why should the Makefile issue a message?
Yours
Manuel
Am Sonntag, den 17.03.2013, 18:06 +0100 schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
On 17.03.2013 18:00, Carsten Koch wrote:
On 03/17/13 13:00, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 17.03.2013 12:46, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Hello,
Should probably have spoken earlier, but is there any particular reason
for the ugly
On 20.03.2013 18:02, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 17.03.2013, 18:06 +0100 schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
On 17.03.2013 18:00, Carsten Koch wrote:
On 03/17/13 13:00, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 17.03.2013 12:46, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Hello,
Should probably have spoken earlier, but is there
Hello,
Should probably have spoken earlier, but is there any particular reason
for the ugly and hard to read Makefile variable names LCLBLD and PLGCFG?
I suppose they're short for LOCALBUILD and PLUGINCONFIG, but why do they
have to be short for anything, it's not like we're running out of space
On 17.03.2013 12:46, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Hello,
Should probably have spoken earlier, but is there any particular reason
for the ugly and hard to read Makefile variable names LCLBLD and PLGCFG?
I suppose they're short for LOCALBUILD and PLUGINCONFIG, but why do they
have to be short for
On 2013-03-17 14:00, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
I'm afraid it's too late for that.
HWLLBDCLLBTHVTRWY
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
On 03/17/13 13:00, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 17.03.2013 12:46, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Hello,
Should probably have spoken earlier, but is there any particular reason
for the ugly and hard to read Makefile variable names LCLBLD and PLGCFG?
I suppose they're short for LOCALBUILD and PLUGINCONFIG,
On 17.03.2013 18:00, Carsten Koch wrote:
On 03/17/13 13:00, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
On 17.03.2013 12:46, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Hello,
Should probably have spoken earlier, but is there any particular reason
for the ugly and hard to read Makefile variable names LCLBLD and PLGCFG?
I suppose
