Re: [vdr] SVDRP Port

2010-03-06 Thread Udo Richter
Am 04.03.2010 13:00, schrieb Theunis Potgieter: On 4 March 2010 13:44, Christian Tramnitz chris@gmx.net wrote: The current SVDRP Port 2001 is being used for several years now, but unfortunately it has never been registered with IANA. that can't be fixed in a few minutes. Would this then

Re: [vdr] SVDRP Port

2010-03-05 Thread Christian Tramnitz
Am 04.03.2010 23:08, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger: I like port 2001 - why stir this up and cause turmoil amoung all those who have been using the default port for so long? What are services dc and wizard, anyway? Klaus I understand that you don't want to touch this, but you are also regularly

Re: [vdr] SVDRP Port

2010-03-05 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 05.03.2010 13:05, Christian Tramnitz wrote: Am 04.03.2010 23:08, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger: I like port 2001 - why stir this up and cause turmoil amoung all those who have been using the default port for so long? What are services dc and wizard, anyway? Klaus I understand that you

Re: [vdr] SVDRP Port

2010-03-05 Thread VDR User
I wonder if this really is a problem. In all my years of using VDR I've never heard of a single complaint about the SVDRP port. However, everyones needs/setup is different so may there is a real issue that I'm unaware of. Could someone give a couple real world (ie: not what-if's) examples of

[vdr] SVDRP Port

2010-03-04 Thread Christian Tramnitz
The current SVDRP Port 2001 is being used for several years now, but unfortunately it has never been registered with IANA. As such it does not show up in /etc/services and there is no name resolution for it, i.e. when starting a tcpdump. While this is not a major issue I'd prefer to register

Re: [vdr] SVDRP Port

2010-03-04 Thread Theunis Potgieter
On 4 March 2010 13:44, Christian Tramnitz chris@gmx.net wrote: The current SVDRP Port 2001 is being used for several years now, but unfortunately it has never been registered with IANA. As such it does not show up in /etc/services and there is no name resolution for it, i.e. when starting

Re: [vdr] SVDRP Port

2010-03-04 Thread Christian Wieninger
Hi, epgsearch uses SVDRP for timer programming. Although the port can be configured in epgsearch's setup a change of the default port would probably cause some support. Plugins can not read vdr's SVDRP port til now, so it would be great to have any function for this and a change of the

Re: [vdr] SVDRP Port

2010-03-04 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On 4 March 2010 22:02, Christian Wieninger cwienin...@gmx.de wrote: epgsearch uses SVDRP for timer programming. Although the port can be configured in epgsearch's setup a change of the default port would probably cause some support. Plugins can not read vdr's SVDRP port til now, so it would

Re: [vdr] SVDRP Port

2010-03-04 Thread Christian Tramnitz
Am 04.03.2010 13:00, schrieb Theunis Potgieter: A lot of changes is required if from end user perspective. Nothing that can't be fixed in a few minutes. No change is required from end-user perspective in the end when the plugins/extensions are adapted to the new port. (In the current vdr-dev

Re: [vdr] SVDRP Port

2010-03-04 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 04.03.2010 12:44, Christian Tramnitz wrote: The current SVDRP Port 2001 is being used for several years now, but unfortunately it has never been registered with IANA. As such it does not show up in /etc/services and there is no name resolution for it, i.e. when starting a tcpdump. While