On 14.05.2011 13:06, Tobi wrote:
On 13.05.2011 23:47, Udo Richter wrote:
Am 13.05.2011 07:44, schrieb Tobi:
Interestingly irritating... Since I don't have an GCC4.6 at hand, I
*think* the source of the problem might be that cCursesFont has just an
default constructor.
Right. The C++
Am 15.05.2011 23:45, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
On 14.05.2011 13:06, Tobi wrote:
Right. The C++ standard explicitly requires an user-declared default
constructor here.
So it should also work if you add an empty
constructor cCursesFont::cCursesFont() { } ???
Yes. Either this or
On 13.05.2011 23:47, Udo Richter wrote:
Am 13.05.2011 07:44, schrieb Tobi:
Interestingly irritating... Since I don't have an GCC4.6 at hand, I
*think* the source of the problem might be that cCursesFont has just an
default constructor.
Right. The C++ standard explicitly requires an
Am 13.05.2011 07:44, schrieb Tobi:
8.5/9 of the C++ standard says
If no initializer is specified for an object, and the object is of
(possibly cv-qualified) nonPOD class type (or array thereof), the object
shall be default-initialized; if the object is of const-qualified type,
the
