Am 18.11.2011 19:03, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
On 16.11.2011 23:59, L. Hanisch wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 23:26, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
On 16.11.2011 19:16, L. Hanisch wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 00:08, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
That is also my understanding of multi frontend devices.
If an adapter
-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] On
Behalf Of L. Hanisch
Sent: Thursday, 17 November 2011 9:59 AM
To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [vdr] VDR and Hybrid DVB Cards ( was HVR 4000 drivers
broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy in linux-media list )
Am 16.11.2011 23:26, schrieb
On 16.11.2011 23:59, L. Hanisch wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 23:26, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
On 16.11.2011 19:16, L. Hanisch wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 00:08, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
That is also my understanding of multi frontend devices.
If an adapter has several frontends only one of them can
be
On 18.11.2011 23:40, Mika Laitio wrote:
I've received an email from Manu Abraham, informing
me that he intends to change the driver in such a way that there will
always
be only *one* frontend, even if it can handle multiple delivery systems.
So every frontend an adapter will provide will always
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 00:40:30 +0200
Mika Laitio lam...@pilppa.org wrote:
I've received an email from Manu Abraham, informing
me that he intends to change the driver in such a way that there
will always
be only *one* frontend, even if it can handle multiple delivery
systems. So every
Cards ( was HVR 4000 drivers
broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy in linux-media list )
Am 16.11.2011 23:26, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
On 16.11.2011 19:16, L. Hanisch wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 00:08, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
That is also my understanding of multi frontend devices.
If an adapter has
Hi all,
I have HVR-4000 in my htpc together with Nova HD S2, and I'm willing
to help as tester. It would be nice to finally getting dvb+t and
dvb-s/s2 working together with VDR.
--
Pozdrawiam,
Tomasz Bubel
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
2011/11/16 Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
klaus.schmidin...@tvdr.de wrote:
That is also my understanding of multi frontend devices.
If an adapter has several frontends only one of them can
be active at any given time. This has nothing
Am 15.11.2011 23:29, schrieb Hawes, Mark:
http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/plg-dynamite
https://github.com/flensrocker/vdr-plugin-dynamite
I had a look at the readme. The approach of making all devices hot
pluggable is an interesting one and provides for a flexible solution.
How
Am 16.11.2011 00:08, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
That is also my understanding of multi frontend devices.
If an adapter has several frontends only one of them can
be active at any given time. This has nothing to do with
any explosives (excuse the pun ;-) and will be implemented
in the core VDR
On 16.11.2011 19:16, L. Hanisch wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 00:08, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
That is also my understanding of multi frontend devices.
If an adapter has several frontends only one of them can
be active at any given time. This has nothing to do with
any explosives (excuse the pun ;-)
Am 16.11.2011 23:26, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
On 16.11.2011 19:16, L. Hanisch wrote:
Am 16.11.2011 00:08, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
That is also my understanding of multi frontend devices.
If an adapter has several frontends only one of them can
be active at any given time. This has nothing
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Steffen Barszus
steffenbpu...@googlemail.com wrote:
2011/11/16 Manu Abraham abraham.m...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
klaus.schmidin...@tvdr.de wrote:
That is also my understanding of multi frontend devices.
If an adapter has
2011/11/15 Hawes, Mark mark.ha...@au.fujitsu.com:
What i got from previous discussions on linux-media is, that if the
device nodes are created within one adapter, an application needs to
assume that
the devices can not be used concurrently and needs to close
one device node group before
This is starting to sound like a big overhaul. If that's the case,
maybe it should go one step further and compartmentalize all the
settings so VDR can take the next step and provide a true
server/client option. ;)
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
Am 15.11.2011 11:52, schrieb Steffen Barszus:
2011/11/15 Hawes, Markmark.ha...@au.fujitsu.com:
What i got from previous discussions on linux-media is, that if the
device nodes are created within one adapter, an application needs to
assume that
the devices can not be used concurrently and needs
-Original Message-
From: vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org [mailto:vdr-boun...@linuxtv.org] On Behalf
Of L. Hanisch
Sent: Wednesday, 16 November 2011 5:51 AM
To: vdr@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [vdr] VDR and Hybrid DVB Cards ( was HVR 4000 drivers
broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy in linux-media list
( was HVR 4000 drivers
broken - adapter0/frontend1 busy in linux-media list )
Am 15.11.2011 11:52, schrieb Steffen Barszus:
2011/11/15 Hawes, Markmark.ha...@au.fujitsu.com:
What i got from previous discussions on linux-media is, that if the
device nodes are created within one adapter
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Klaus Schmidinger
klaus.schmidin...@tvdr.de wrote:
That is also my understanding of multi frontend devices.
If an adapter has several frontends only one of them can
be active at any given time. This has nothing to do with
any explosives (excuse the pun ;-) and
Lars,
Thanks for the reply.
Output of ls -la /dev/dvb/adapter0:
root@Nutrigrain:/home/digitalTV/vdr-1.7.21# ls -la /dev/dvb/adapter0/*
crw-rw 1 root video 212, 1 Nov 14 19:20 /dev/dvb/adapter0/demux0
crw-rw 1 root video 212, 5 Nov 14 19:20 /dev/dvb/adapter0/demux1
crw-rw 1 root
20 matches
Mail list logo
