> Out of curiosity, whats the ballpark average bitrate of your non-sports 1080p
> content?
Following the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) guidelines there's no 1080p
broadcast in Europe and will most propably not happen. The HD formats in Europe
are 1280x720p50, 1440x1080i25 and 1920x1080i25.
On 03.01.2017 07:20, VDR User wrote:
...
For those using device bonding, per Klaus's latest post it will live
to see another day in the VDR core. I did, I think (my translator is
horrible), see someone asking @ vdr-portal if it could be put into a
plugin. If so, does that make sense for this
Andreas/fnu:
I didn't realize it varied that much from NA/SA/JP vs. EU but I guess
so! Out of curiosity, whats the ballpark average bitrate of your
non-sports 1080p content?
For those using device bonding, per Klaus's latest post it will live
to see another day in the VDR core. I did, I think (my
I don't mean to disturb the technical aspect of this discussion, but
just wanted to let everybody know that since there still *are* users
who need this feature, it's not going to be removed.
Klaus
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
Derek,
you're right it's maybe possible to stack channels somewhat, but not on the
user end of the "one cable". It must be "stacked" on the other end of the "one
cable" and splitted again on the user side of that cable. And here's the
problem, there are VDR users out there they cannot change
Hi Derek,
Am 02.01.2017 um 17:43 schrieb VDR User:
> Andreas:
> As I said, no "magic" or "luck" is needed. Apparently you've never
> heard of bandstacking. In the case of DVB-S, it's where one side is
> carried in 950-1450Mhz and the other is carried in 1650-2150Mhz - full
> circular lnb on
Andreas:
As I said, no "magic" or "luck" is needed. Apparently you've never
heard of bandstacking. In the case of DVB-S, it's where one side is
carried in 950-1450Mhz and the other is carried in 1650-2150Mhz - full
circular lnb on ..one..single..cable,..no..magic. Bandstacking doesn't
use voltage
> Are you saying people are not allowed to put a switch at the point where the
> cable plugins into their dvb device? It would be no different that putting an
> ethernet switch on your ethernet line. You don't need to alter anything aside
> of instead of the cable going into your dvb card, it
Hi Derek,
Am 02.01.2017 um 01:46 schrieb VDR User:
>> I would like to know which magic switch behind a single cable receiving only
>> one polarization/band allows feeding multiple tuners with independent
>> signals. ;-)
>
> There is no "magic", you probably should read up on switches I guess.
> I would like to know which magic switch behind a single cable receiving only
> one polarization/band allows feeding multiple tuners with independent
> signals. ;-)
There is no "magic", you probably should read up on switches I guess.
___
vdr
> pretty simple, there are users who cannot change their SAT infrastructure
> easily. The reasons are varied, e.g. they are tenants and not allowed to
> change it by the owners, they own it and cannot change it due to the rules of
> commonhold association or the own it and the construction of
things about vdr.
All the best,
Michael
Gesendet: Sonntag, 01. Januar 2017 um 19:06 Uhr
Von: "Andreas Regel" <andreas.re...@gmx.de>
An: vdr@linuxtv.org
Betreff: Re: [vdr] [POLL] Is anybody actually using "device bonding" (aka "LNB sharing)?
Am 01.01
Am 01.01.2017 um 18:36 schrieb VDR User:
>> they do in vdr-portal.de ... as I already do remember a bunch of users still
>> using that function and the reasons why, so no what-if-scenarios.
>
> Not sure why you didn't mention that earlier but aside of that it
> still doesn't answer this part:
Derek,
pretty simple, there are users who cannot change their SAT infrastructure
easily. The reasons are varied, e.g. they are tenants and not allowed to change
it by the owners, they own it and cannot change it due to the rules of
commonhold association or the own it and the construction of
> they do in vdr-portal.de ... as I already do remember a bunch of users still
> using that function and the reasons why, so no what-if-scenarios.
Not sure why you didn't mention that earlier but aside of that it
still doesn't answer this part: "I'd like to know why they don't just
use a switch.
Derek,
they do in vdr-portal.de ... as I already do remember a bunch of users still
using that function and the reasons why, so no what-if-scenarios.
fnu
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
https://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
There's no point in worrying about what-if scenarios, actual real
world usage is what matters. Klaus is giving those who use device
bonding the chance to speak up now. If there's very little-to-no
interest in it, it's gone. Unless I've misunderstood the intention
here. If there rally is someone
> So I take it you yourself are *not* using this feature, right?
Not active anymore, but in the past for many years, just up to a couple of
years ago for my development machine.
Getting rid of that feature may also causing the comeback of any sort of patch,
maybe causing other issue, nobody
On 01.01.2017 13:57, fnu wrote:
Hi Klaus,
well, you're right it's a hack, but IMHO not really an ugly one. A similar
function is up today part of some premium products from Loewe or Metz, bonding
two DVB-S/S2 tuners.
Originally it was limited to two devices, what really can make sense. I
Hi Klaus,
well, you're right it's a hack, but IMHO not really an ugly one. A similar
function is up today part of some premium products from Loewe or Metz, bonding
two DVB-S/S2 tuners.
Originally it was limited to two devices, what really can make sense. I have
never seen any reason to make
20 matches
Mail list logo
