Re: [vdr] Client/server implementation after VDR 2.0: Do not reinvent the whole wheel

2012-03-01 Thread Gero
On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 17:45:02, Paul Menzel wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2012, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Gero: > > On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 10:31:37, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 07:03:03, VDR User wrote: > > > > > > I just want to throw in, that there are several p

Re: [vdr] Client/server implementation after VDR 2.0: Do not reinvent the whole wheel

2012-03-01 Thread syrius . ml
Paul Menzel writes: > Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2012, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Gero: >> On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 10:31:37, Paul Menzel wrote: >> > On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 07:03:03, VDR User wrote: >> > >> > I just want to throw in, that there are several programs already using a >> > client/serv

Re: [vdr] Client/server implementation after VDR 2.0: Do not reinvent the whole wheel

2012-03-01 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2012, 15:31 +0100 schrieb Gero: > On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 10:31:37, Paul Menzel wrote: > > On Thursday 01 March 2012 - 07:03:03, VDR User wrote: > > > > I just want to throw in, that there are several programs already using a > > client/server approach (MythTV [1], Tvhe