Would be cool to test any S2API vdr patches.
cu
Edgar (gimli) Hucek
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:34:01PM +0200, Niels Wagenaar wrote:
>> Hello all (and especially Klaus):
>>
>> It's official, the people from V4L have voted for the usage of the S2API
>> proposal to be the future for new DVB API i
I would be glad to test any S2API vdr patches.
cu
Edgar (gimli) Hucek
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:34:01PM +0200, Niels Wagenaar wrote:
>> Hello all (and especially Klaus):
>>
>> It's official, the people from V4L have voted for the usage of the S2API
>> proposal to be the future for new DVB API
> > It's official, the people from V4L have voted for the usage of the S2API
> > proposal to be the future for new DVB API
> > improvements (see the official announcement at the bottom) within the V4L
> > tree. Currently S2API is in a real
> > speed-train and new devices are added very rapidly. O
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:34:01PM +0200, Niels Wagenaar wrote:
> Hello all (and especially Klaus):
>
> It's official, the people from V4L have voted for the usage of the S2API
> proposal to be the future for new DVB API improvements (see the official
> announcement at the bottom) within the V4L
Niels Wagenaar wrote:
> So, this should mean that VDR 1.7.x should focus on S2API because of
> the obvious reasons. Has anybody started on a patch of somekind to
> include S2API in VDR 1.7.0 or 1.7.1? Mainly I was thinking of doing
> it myself (I have a Hauppauge WinTV-NOVA-HD-S2 which is allready
