Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-29 Thread J . W .
Matthias Schwarzottz...@gentoo.org schrieb am 28.06.2009 um 21:55: On Samstag, 27. Juni 2009, Udo Richter wrote: On 25.06.2009 21:55, Ville Skyttä wrote: Hmmm, this could also be a great opportunity: Why not nominate someone as the official maintainer of the 1.6 stable branch? Someone who

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-29 Thread J . W .
Well, I am not keen on doing this, but to get some progress I at least did upload my git tree based on vdr-1.6.0-2 version of git://vdr.gekrumbel.de/vdr.git to github: http://github.com/zzam/vdr/tree/stable git://github.com/zzam/vdr.git Branch stable It contains up to now only my

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-29 Thread Jan Willies
Hi Joachim, Am 29.06.2009 09:49, schrieb J.W.: Well, I am not keen on doing this, but to get some progress I at least did upload my git tree based on vdr-1.6.0-2 version of git://vdr.gekrumbel.de/vdr.git to github: http://github.com/zzam/vdr/tree/stable git://github.com/zzam/vdr.git Branch

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-29 Thread J . W .
Jan Williesj...@willies.info schrieb am 29.06.2009 um 09:52: Hi Joachim, Am 29.06.2009 09:49, schrieb J.W.: Well, I am not keen on doing this, but to get some progress I at least did upload my git tree based on vdr-1.6.0-2 version of git://vdr.gekrumbel.de/vdr.git to github:

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-28 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
On Samstag, 27. Juni 2009, Udo Richter wrote: On 25.06.2009 21:55, Ville Skyttä wrote: Hmmm, this could also be a great opportunity: Why not nominate someone as the official maintainer of the 1.6 stable branch? Someone who collects or back-ports fixes and smaller enhancements to the 1.6

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-27 Thread Udo Richter
On 25.06.2009 21:55, Ville Skyttä wrote: Hmmm, this could also be a great opportunity: Why not nominate someone as the official maintainer of the 1.6 stable branch? Someone who collects or back-ports fixes and smaller enhancements to the 1.6 branch, and does minor releases based on community

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-25 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Sunday 21 June 2009, Udo Richter wrote: On 21.06.2009 17:08, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 17.06.2009 19:03, J.W. wrote: I thought you could just release vdr-1.6.1 with the patches you have already published (maybe with additional dvb_api patch) . Are there more bugfixes planed? I

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-25 Thread Jan Willies
Am 25.06.2009 21:55, schrieb Ville Skyttä: On Sunday 21 June 2009, Udo Richter wrote: On 21.06.2009 17:08, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 17.06.2009 19:03, J.W. wrote: I thought you could just release vdr-1.6.1 with the patches you have already published (maybe with additional dvb_api patch) .

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-21 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 17.06.2009 19:03, J.W. wrote: I thought you could just release vdr-1.6.1 with the patches you have already published (maybe with additional dvb_api patch) . Are there more bugfixes planed? I released VDR 1.6.0 only because several people wanted to have a stable release just before switching

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-21 Thread Udo Richter
On 21.06.2009 17:08, Klaus Schmidinger wrote: On 17.06.2009 19:03, J.W. wrote: I thought you could just release vdr-1.6.1 with the patches you have already published (maybe with additional dvb_api patch) . Are there more bugfixes planed? I released VDR 1.6.0 only because several people

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-17 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 06/16/09 10:30, Joachim Welker wrote: Hi Klaus, I see you are very busy in developing the new vdr-1.7.* (thanks for your great work !). But what about stable vdr-1.6.0? You released two patches which should result in version vdr-1.6.1. AFAIR there were no complaints about these patches, so

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-17 Thread J.W.
I thought you could just release vdr-1.6.1 with the patches you have already published (maybe with additional dvb_api patch) . Are there more bugfixes planed? 2009/6/17 Klaus Schmidinger klaus.schmidin...@cadsoft.de On 06/16/09 10:30, Joachim Welker wrote: Hi Klaus, I see you are very busy

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-16 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
On Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009, Joachim Welker wrote: Hi Klaus, I see you are very busy in developing the new vdr-1.7.* (thanks for your great work !). But what about stable vdr-1.6.0? You released two patches which should result in version vdr-1.6.1. AFAIR there were no complaints about these

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-16 Thread VDR User
The patch vdr-dvb-api-5-is-fine.diff is not a proper fix iirc. ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Re: [vdr] What about vdr-1.6.1?

2009-06-16 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
On Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009, VDR User wrote: The patch vdr-dvb-api-5-is-fine.diff is not a proper fix iirc. Ok, so where is the problem, and how should a proper fix look like? Regards Matthias ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org