Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 06.02.2010 16:58, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
 ...
 Please give the attached patch a try.

Correction: it needs to be CardIndex() + 1 instead of DeviceNumber():

  dvbTuner = new cDvbTuner(CardIndex() + 1, fd_frontend, adapter, frontend, 
frontendType);

  if (!Setup.DiSEqC || Diseqcs.Get(CardIndex() + 1, Channel-Source(), 
Channel-Frequency(), Channel-Polarization()))

Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-07 Thread Timothy D. Lenz
 On the card side, Say you have a standard s1 and a s2. The s2 can do 
both s1 and s2, but the standard only card can only do s1. There is also 
turbo mode in NA and cards that do turbo can also do standard but they 
can't do s2. We have all 3 types in use though most of the turbo mode 
requires a propriatory receiver.


There are also problems on the dish side. Two dishes, One fixed, one on 
a rotor. If each goes to a separate card, clearly, the fixed dish can 
only see what is on one sat while the rotor can see that sat plus many 
others. If the lnb on the rotor is of the dual mode type, 
circular/linear, or covers a greater range as some do, then even while 
pointing to the same sat as the fixed, it will cover stuff the fixed 
can't. There could also be ways using dual output lnbs, where the fixed 
and rotor have signals going to two cards. only one card can move the 
dish, but ether card can see ether dish. When recording 2 channels at 
the same time, vdr needs a way to know if both are on the same sat, then 
it can use the rotor for both. For recording on different sats, it
needs to plan ahead by putting the recording that is on a sat not 
viewable by the fixed dish, on the card that can move the dish so that a 
second recordind on the sat viewable by the fixed dish goes to the other 
card. Sounds confusing, but with multi-dish setups, that happens.


On 2/6/2010 5:05 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:

On 07.02.2010 00:31, Timothy D. Lenz wrote:

This would cause duplicate lines for devices that overlap, such has
where there are both fixed and rotor dish. Better to include the
supporting devices in the entries.


I don't see what you mean.
Can you be more specific?

Klaus


On 2/6/2010 4:57 AM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:

On 02.02.2010 07:35, Ian Bates wrote:

On 1 Feb 2010, at 22:24, abbe normal wrote:

On 2/1/10, VDR Useruser@gmail.com   wrote:

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim
Sahinhalim.sa...@t-online.de   wrote:

Hi List and Klaus,

It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup directly in
vdr.

I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current
solution is
difficult for endusers.
Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's
commands.
A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
usability of vdr!

Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how to do
this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no support for
multiple switches.



hey guys

i agree multi cards should be able to use mutli diseqc configs... or
at least be able to assign them to different switches that could be
used... would be nice to add more dishes and lnbs to my setup... would
like to do c and ku band dvb as well as have at least 2 to 3 fixed
dishes with lnbs on them now im limited to 4 max or use a very costly
switch...

abby


Dear all,

I have a diseqc-patch I that hacked together a couple of years ago
relating to multi-cards/multi-switches that has served my purpose
well.  It may not be the best way, it may even be the wrong way.  I
will drag it out of the VDR box for all to see but that will not be
for a couple of days.

MOTIVATION

I have three LNBs (28.2/5, 19.2, 13.0) and two cards, each card
attached to a 4-way diseqc switch.  Despite the switches being the
same model and bought at the same time each one responds to a
different set of diseqc commands to change LNB.  IIRC one seemed to
behave as a cascade of 2-way switches, the other responded to the
more usual commands for a 4-way switch.

DESCRIPTION

Enter my hack.  It allows diseqc commands to be defined on a per-card
basis (numbered 1, 2, ...).  How you determine which number
corresponds to which card is left as an exercise for the reader
(hint: the margin may not be big enough).  These defines are placed
in 'diseqc-multi.conf' and start with the card number but are
otherwise the same format as those found in 'diseqc.conf'.

CONFIGURATION

Configuration options within VDR are:

- use only the diseqc.conf defines,
- use only the diseqc-multi.conf,
- use the disqc-multi.conf if a card definition appears otherwise use
the diseqc.conf defines.


I don't like the introduction of a separate diseqc-multi.conf file,
and also those additional setup options in VDR.

What about simply extending the existing diseqc.conf file to
accept device numbers, as in:

1 2 4:

S19.2E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 A W15 t
S19.2E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 A W15 T
S19.2E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 A W15 t
S19.2E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 A W15 T

3 5:

S13.0E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F4] W15 B W15 t
S13.0E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F5] W15 B W15 T
S13.0E  11700 H  9750  

Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 07.02.2010 19:26, Timothy D. Lenz wrote:
  On the card side, Say you have a standard s1 and a s2. The s2 can do
 both s1 and s2, but the standard only card can only do s1. There is also
 turbo mode in NA and cards that do turbo can also do standard but they
 can't do s2. We have all 3 types in use though most of the turbo mode
 requires a propriatory receiver.
 
 There are also problems on the dish side. Two dishes, One fixed, one on
 a rotor. If each goes to a separate card, clearly, the fixed dish can
 only see what is on one sat while the rotor can see that sat plus many
 others. If the lnb on the rotor is of the dual mode type,
 circular/linear, or covers a greater range as some do, then even while
 pointing to the same sat as the fixed, it will cover stuff the fixed
 can't. There could also be ways using dual output lnbs, where the fixed
 and rotor have signals going to two cards. only one card can move the
 dish, but ether card can see ether dish. When recording 2 channels at
 the same time, vdr needs a way to know if both are on the same sat, then
 it can use the rotor for both. For recording on different sats, it
 needs to plan ahead by putting the recording that is on a sat not
 viewable by the fixed dish, on the card that can move the dish so that a
 second recordind on the sat viewable by the fixed dish goes to the other
 card. Sounds confusing, but with multi-dish setups, that happens.

I guess now you know why I never even touched that motor topic ;-)

I just wanted to add a simple way by which people who don't have
a setup where every DVB-S card can receive every sat position (by means
of (cascaded) multiswitches) can fine tune their diseqc.conf. There was
absolutely no intention to even think about this whole motor complexity.
That's way too complicated for my taste.

Klaus

 On 2/6/2010 5:05 PM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
 On 07.02.2010 00:31, Timothy D. Lenz wrote:
 This would cause duplicate lines for devices that overlap, such has
 where there are both fixed and rotor dish. Better to include the
 supporting devices in the entries.

 I don't see what you mean.
 Can you be more specific?

 Klaus

 On 2/6/2010 4:57 AM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
 On 02.02.2010 07:35, Ian Bates wrote:
 On 1 Feb 2010, at 22:24, abbe normal wrote:
 On 2/1/10, VDR Useruser@gmail.com   wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim
 Sahinhalim.sa...@t-online.de   wrote:
 Hi List and Klaus,

 It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup
 directly in
 vdr.

 I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current
 solution is
 difficult for endusers.
 Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's
 commands.
 A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
 usability of vdr!
 Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
 more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how
 to do
 this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
 is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
 cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
 cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no
 support for
 multiple switches.


 hey guys

 i agree multi cards should be able to use mutli diseqc configs... or
 at least be able to assign them to different switches that could be
 used... would be nice to add more dishes and lnbs to my setup...
 would
 like to do c and ku band dvb as well as have at least 2 to 3 fixed
 dishes with lnbs on them now im limited to 4 max or use a very costly
 switch...

 abby

 Dear all,

 I have a diseqc-patch I that hacked together a couple of years ago
 relating to multi-cards/multi-switches that has served my purpose
 well.  It may not be the best way, it may even be the wrong way.  I
 will drag it out of the VDR box for all to see but that will not be
 for a couple of days.

 MOTIVATION

 I have three LNBs (28.2/5, 19.2, 13.0) and two cards, each card
 attached to a 4-way diseqc switch.  Despite the switches being the
 same model and bought at the same time each one responds to a
 different set of diseqc commands to change LNB.  IIRC one seemed to
 behave as a cascade of 2-way switches, the other responded to the
 more usual commands for a 4-way switch.

 DESCRIPTION

 Enter my hack.  It allows diseqc commands to be defined on a per-card
 basis (numbered 1, 2, ...).  How you determine which number
 corresponds to which card is left as an exercise for the reader
 (hint: the margin may not be big enough).  These defines are placed
 in 'diseqc-multi.conf' and start with the card number but are
 otherwise the same format as those found in 'diseqc.conf'.

 CONFIGURATION

 Configuration options within VDR are:

 - use only the diseqc.conf defines,
 - use only the diseqc-multi.conf,
 - use the disqc-multi.conf if a card definition appears otherwise use
 the diseqc.conf defines.

 I don't like the introduction of a separate diseqc-multi.conf file,
 and also those 

Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-07 Thread Halim Sahin
Hi Klaus,
On So, Feb 07, 2010 at 09:53:14 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
 I guess now you know why I never even touched that motor topic ;-)

Sorry Klaus for touching this topic :-(.
My intension was to have an easy way for configuring (simple) diseqc
setups directly in vdr.
Br.
Halim


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-07 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 07.02.2010 22:27, Halim Sahin wrote:
 Hi Klaus,
 On So, Feb 07, 2010 at 09:53:14 +0100, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
 I guess now you know why I never even touched that motor topic ;-)
 
 Sorry Klaus for touching this topic :-(.
 My intension was to have an easy way for configuring (simple) diseqc
 setups directly in vdr.

I'm sure somebody can write a plugin that offers such a configuration
dialog and writes out a diseqc.conf.

The capability to add device numbers to diseqc.conf will be in version 1.7.13.

Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-07 Thread André Weidemann

Hi,

On 06.02.2010 16:05, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:


On 06.02.2010 13:55, Halim Sahin wrote:

I'd suggest to add a (plugin or settingsmenü) for vdr which alows easy
configuration of the diseqc stuff without touching diseqc.conf.
Doing this by implementing a plugin is ok for me but it should be
shipped with vdr because I think it's a core feature of a video disk recorder!


I suggest somebody writes a plugin that does this.


In September last year I started a little patch for VDR 1.6.0 with the 
intention to add OneCable support to VDR. Due to lack of time I did not 
continue the project.
If someone is interested in the code, they can take a look at it here: 
http://ilpss8.dyndns.org/hg/vdr-1.6.0-diseqc/.
I am not a skilled programmer, so I'm sure this code has some flaws. The 
setup option for OneCable is there, but there is no code behind it, yet. 
The other DiSecQ setup options should work.


 André

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 02.02.2010 07:35, Ian Bates wrote:
 On 1 Feb 2010, at 22:24, abbe normal wrote:
 On 2/1/10, VDR User user@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim Sahin halim.sa...@t-online.de wrote:
 Hi List and Klaus,

 It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup directly in
 vdr.

 I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current solution is
 difficult for endusers.
 Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's commands.
 A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
 usability of vdr!
 Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
 more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how to do
 this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
 is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
 cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
 cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no support for
 multiple switches.


 hey guys

 i agree multi cards should be able to use mutli diseqc configs... or
 at least be able to assign them to different switches that could be
 used... would be nice to add more dishes and lnbs to my setup... would
 like to do c and ku band dvb as well as have at least 2 to 3 fixed
 dishes with lnbs on them now im limited to 4 max or use a very costly
 switch...

 abby
 
 Dear all,
 
 I have a diseqc-patch I that hacked together a couple of years ago relating 
 to multi-cards/multi-switches that has served my purpose well.  It may not be 
 the best way, it may even be the wrong way.  I will drag it out of the VDR 
 box for all to see but that will not be for a couple of days.
 
 MOTIVATION
 
 I have three LNBs (28.2/5, 19.2, 13.0) and two cards, each card attached to a 
 4-way diseqc switch.  Despite the switches being the same model and bought at 
 the same time each one responds to a different set of diseqc commands to 
 change LNB.  IIRC one seemed to behave as a cascade of 2-way switches, the 
 other responded to the more usual commands for a 4-way switch.
 
 DESCRIPTION
 
 Enter my hack.  It allows diseqc commands to be defined on a per-card basis 
 (numbered 1, 2, ...).  How you determine which number corresponds to which 
 card is left as an exercise for the reader (hint: the margin may not be big 
 enough).  These defines are placed in 'diseqc-multi.conf' and start with the 
 card number but are otherwise the same format as those found in 'diseqc.conf'.
 
 CONFIGURATION
 
 Configuration options within VDR are:
 
 - use only the diseqc.conf defines, 
 - use only the diseqc-multi.conf, 
 - use the disqc-multi.conf if a card definition appears otherwise use the 
 diseqc.conf defines.

I don't like the introduction of a separate diseqc-multi.conf file,
and also those additional setup options in VDR.

What about simply extending the existing diseqc.conf file to
accept device numbers, as in:

1 2 4:

S19.2E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 A W15 t
S19.2E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 A W15 T
S19.2E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 A W15 t
S19.2E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 A W15 T

3 5:

S13.0E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F4] W15 B W15 t
S13.0E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F5] W15 B W15 T
S13.0E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F6] W15 B W15 t
S13.0E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F7] W15 B W15 T


This could mean that devices 1, 2 and 4 can receive S19.2E,
while devices 3 and 5 can receive S13.0E.

If no device numbers (followed by a ':') are given, a setup
where every device can receive every satellite is assumed.

Once a line with device numbers (followed by a ':') appears,
these apply to all following diseqc lines, until the next
line with device numbers is seen.
If a diseqc line is parsed without a previous device line,
that diseqc line applies to all devices.

Klaus









___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-06 Thread Ian Bates

On 6 Feb 2010, at 11:57, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:

 On 02.02.2010 07:35, Ian Bates wrote:
 On 1 Feb 2010, at 22:24, abbe normal wrote:
 On 2/1/10, VDR User user@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim Sahin halim.sa...@t-online.de 
 wrote:
 Hi List and Klaus,
 
 It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup directly in
 vdr.
 
 I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current solution is
 difficult for endusers.
 Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's commands.
 A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
 usability of vdr!
 Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
 more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how to do
 this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
 is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
 cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
 cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no support for
 multiple switches.
 
 
 hey guys
 
 i agree multi cards should be able to use mutli diseqc configs... or
 at least be able to assign them to different switches that could be
 used... would be nice to add more dishes and lnbs to my setup... would
 like to do c and ku band dvb as well as have at least 2 to 3 fixed
 dishes with lnbs on them now im limited to 4 max or use a very costly
 switch...
 
 abby
 
 Dear all,
 
 I have a diseqc-patch I that hacked together a couple of years ago relating 
 to multi-cards/multi-switches that has served my purpose well.  It may not 
 be the best way, it may even be the wrong way.  I will drag it out of the 
 VDR box for all to see but that will not be for a couple of days.
 
 MOTIVATION
 
 I have three LNBs (28.2/5, 19.2, 13.0) and two cards, each card attached to 
 a 4-way diseqc switch.  Despite the switches being the same model and bought 
 at the same time each one responds to a different set of diseqc commands to 
 change LNB.  IIRC one seemed to behave as a cascade of 2-way switches, the 
 other responded to the more usual commands for a 4-way switch.
 
 DESCRIPTION
 
 Enter my hack.  It allows diseqc commands to be defined on a per-card basis 
 (numbered 1, 2, ...).  How you determine which number corresponds to which 
 card is left as an exercise for the reader (hint: the margin may not be big 
 enough).  These defines are placed in 'diseqc-multi.conf' and start with the 
 card number but are otherwise the same format as those found in 
 'diseqc.conf'.
 
 CONFIGURATION
 
 Configuration options within VDR are:
 
 - use only the diseqc.conf defines, 
 - use only the diseqc-multi.conf, 
 - use the disqc-multi.conf if a card definition appears otherwise use the 
 diseqc.conf defines.
 
 I don't like the introduction of a separate diseqc-multi.conf file,
 and also those additional setup options in VDR.
 
 What about simply extending the existing diseqc.conf file to
 accept device numbers, as in:
 
 1 2 4:
 
 S19.2E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 A W15 t
 S19.2E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 A W15 T
 S19.2E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 A W15 t
 S19.2E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 A W15 T
 
 3 5:
 
 S13.0E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F4] W15 B W15 t
 S13.0E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F5] W15 B W15 T
 S13.0E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F6] W15 B W15 t
 S13.0E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F7] W15 B W15 T
 
 
 This could mean that devices 1, 2 and 4 can receive S19.2E,
 while devices 3 and 5 can receive S13.0E.
 
 If no device numbers (followed by a ':') are given, a setup
 where every device can receive every satellite is assumed.
 
 Once a line with device numbers (followed by a ':') appears,
 these apply to all following diseqc lines, until the next
 line with device numbers is seen.
 If a diseqc line is parsed without a previous device line,
 that diseqc line applies to all devices.
 
 Klaus


Dear Klaus, all,

That sounds good.  Using this proposal I would configure my system with the 
following diseqc.conf:

# diseqc.conf

S28.2E a1...
S28.2E a2...
S28.2E a3...
S28.2E a4...

S19.2E b1...
S19.2E b2...
S19.2E b3...
S19.2E b4...

S13.0E c1...
S13.0E c2...
S13.0E c3...
S13.0E c4...

2:

S28.2E A1...
S28.2E A2...
S28.2E A3...
S28.2E A4...

S19.2E B1...
S19.2E B2...
S19.2E B3...
S19.2E B4...

S13.0E B1...
S13.0E B2...
S13.0E B3...
S13.0E B4...

# EOF

where [a-cA-C][1-4]... are diseqc command sequences.

If I understand correctly, with Klaus' proposal my 'normal' switch (card 1) 
would use the [a-c][1-4]... commands, and my problem switch (attached to card 
2) would use the [A-C][1-4]... commands.  Any additional cards would also use 
the [a-c][1-4]... commands.

Unless I have understood incorrectly this gets my vote, if someone implements!


Ian.
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 06.02.2010 13:26, Ian Bates wrote:
 On 6 Feb 2010, at 11:57, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
 
 On 02.02.2010 07:35, Ian Bates wrote:
 On 1 Feb 2010, at 22:24, abbe normal wrote:
 On 2/1/10, VDR User user@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim Sahin halim.sa...@t-online.de 
 wrote:
 Hi List and Klaus,

 It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup directly in
 vdr.

 I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current solution is
 difficult for endusers.
 Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's commands.
 A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
 usability of vdr!
 Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
 more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how to do
 this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
 is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
 cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
 cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no support for
 multiple switches.


 hey guys

 i agree multi cards should be able to use mutli diseqc configs... or
 at least be able to assign them to different switches that could be
 used... would be nice to add more dishes and lnbs to my setup... would
 like to do c and ku band dvb as well as have at least 2 to 3 fixed
 dishes with lnbs on them now im limited to 4 max or use a very costly
 switch...

 abby
 Dear all,

 I have a diseqc-patch I that hacked together a couple of years ago relating 
 to multi-cards/multi-switches that has served my purpose well.  It may not 
 be the best way, it may even be the wrong way.  I will drag it out of the 
 VDR box for all to see but that will not be for a couple of days.

 MOTIVATION

 I have three LNBs (28.2/5, 19.2, 13.0) and two cards, each card attached to 
 a 4-way diseqc switch.  Despite the switches being the same model and 
 bought at the same time each one responds to a different set of diseqc 
 commands to change LNB.  IIRC one seemed to behave as a cascade of 2-way 
 switches, the other responded to the more usual commands for a 4-way switch.

 DESCRIPTION

 Enter my hack.  It allows diseqc commands to be defined on a per-card basis 
 (numbered 1, 2, ...).  How you determine which number corresponds to which 
 card is left as an exercise for the reader (hint: the margin may not be big 
 enough).  These defines are placed in 'diseqc-multi.conf' and start with 
 the card number but are otherwise the same format as those found in 
 'diseqc.conf'.

 CONFIGURATION

 Configuration options within VDR are:

 - use only the diseqc.conf defines, 
 - use only the diseqc-multi.conf, 
 - use the disqc-multi.conf if a card definition appears otherwise use the 
 diseqc.conf defines.
 I don't like the introduction of a separate diseqc-multi.conf file,
 and also those additional setup options in VDR.

 What about simply extending the existing diseqc.conf file to
 accept device numbers, as in:

 1 2 4:

 S19.2E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 A W15 t
 S19.2E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 A W15 T
 S19.2E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 A W15 t
 S19.2E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 A W15 T

 3 5:

 S13.0E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F4] W15 B W15 t
 S13.0E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F5] W15 B W15 T
 S13.0E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F6] W15 B W15 t
 S13.0E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F7] W15 B W15 T


 This could mean that devices 1, 2 and 4 can receive S19.2E,
 while devices 3 and 5 can receive S13.0E.

 If no device numbers (followed by a ':') are given, a setup
 where every device can receive every satellite is assumed.

 Once a line with device numbers (followed by a ':') appears,
 these apply to all following diseqc lines, until the next
 line with device numbers is seen.
 If a diseqc line is parsed without a previous device line,
 that diseqc line applies to all devices.

 Klaus
 
 
 Dear Klaus, all,
 
 That sounds good.  Using this proposal I would configure my system with the 
 following diseqc.conf:
 
 # diseqc.conf
 
 S28.2E a1...
 S28.2E a2...
 S28.2E a3...
 S28.2E a4...
 
 S19.2E b1...
 S19.2E b2...
 S19.2E b3...
 S19.2E b4...
 
 S13.0E c1...
 S13.0E c2...
 S13.0E c3...
 S13.0E c4...
 
 2:
 
 S28.2E A1...
 S28.2E A2...
 S28.2E A3...
 S28.2E A4...
 
 S19.2E B1...
 S19.2E B2...
 S19.2E B3...
 S19.2E B4...
 
 S13.0E B1...
 S13.0E B2...
 S13.0E B3...
 S13.0E B4...
 
 # EOF
 
 where [a-cA-C][1-4]... are diseqc command sequences.
 
 If I understand correctly, with Klaus' proposal my 'normal' switch (card 1) 
 would use the [a-c][1-4]... commands, and my problem switch (attached to card 
 2) would use the [A-C][1-4]... commands.  Any additional cards would also use 
 the [a-c][1-4]... commands.

You would have to put

1:

at the beginning of that file, because otherwise everything before the

2:

would be applicable to *all* devices, including #2. The first entry 

Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-06 Thread Halim Sahin
Hi Klaus,
Thx for your response for this request :-).
My initial intension was a bit different than the later diskusion went
on.

I'd suggest to add a (plugin or settingsmenü) for vdr which alows easy
configuration of the diseqc stuff without touching diseqc.conf.
Doing this by implementing a plugin is ok for me but it should be
shipped with vdr because I think it's a core feature of a video disk recorder!
BR.
Halim


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 06.02.2010 13:55, Halim Sahin wrote:
 Hi Klaus,
 Thx for your response for this request :-).
 My initial intension was a bit different than the later diskusion went
 on.
 
 I'd suggest to add a (plugin or settingsmenü) for vdr which alows easy
 configuration of the diseqc stuff without touching diseqc.conf.
 Doing this by implementing a plugin is ok for me but it should be
 shipped with vdr because I think it's a core feature of a video disk recorder!

I suggest somebody writes a plugin that does this.

Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 06.02.2010 13:38, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
 On 06.02.2010 13:26, Ian Bates wrote:
 On 6 Feb 2010, at 11:57, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:

 On 02.02.2010 07:35, Ian Bates wrote:
 On 1 Feb 2010, at 22:24, abbe normal wrote:
 On 2/1/10, VDR User user@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim Sahin halim.sa...@t-online.de 
 wrote:
 Hi List and Klaus,

 It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup directly in
 vdr.

 I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current solution is
 difficult for endusers.
 Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's commands.
 A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
 usability of vdr!
 Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
 more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how to do
 this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
 is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
 cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
 cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no support for
 multiple switches.


 hey guys

 i agree multi cards should be able to use mutli diseqc configs... or
 at least be able to assign them to different switches that could be
 used... would be nice to add more dishes and lnbs to my setup... would
 like to do c and ku band dvb as well as have at least 2 to 3 fixed
 dishes with lnbs on them now im limited to 4 max or use a very costly
 switch...

 abby
 Dear all,

 I have a diseqc-patch I that hacked together a couple of years ago 
 relating to multi-cards/multi-switches that has served my purpose well.  
 It may not be the best way, it may even be the wrong way.  I will drag it 
 out of the VDR box for all to see but that will not be for a couple of 
 days.

 MOTIVATION

 I have three LNBs (28.2/5, 19.2, 13.0) and two cards, each card attached 
 to a 4-way diseqc switch.  Despite the switches being the same model and 
 bought at the same time each one responds to a different set of diseqc 
 commands to change LNB.  IIRC one seemed to behave as a cascade of 2-way 
 switches, the other responded to the more usual commands for a 4-way 
 switch.

 DESCRIPTION

 Enter my hack.  It allows diseqc commands to be defined on a per-card 
 basis (numbered 1, 2, ...).  How you determine which number corresponds to 
 which card is left as an exercise for the reader (hint: the margin may not 
 be big enough).  These defines are placed in 'diseqc-multi.conf' and start 
 with the card number but are otherwise the same format as those found in 
 'diseqc.conf'.

 CONFIGURATION

 Configuration options within VDR are:

 - use only the diseqc.conf defines, 
 - use only the diseqc-multi.conf, 
 - use the disqc-multi.conf if a card definition appears otherwise use the 
 diseqc.conf defines.
 I don't like the introduction of a separate diseqc-multi.conf file,
 and also those additional setup options in VDR.

 What about simply extending the existing diseqc.conf file to
 accept device numbers, as in:

 1 2 4:

 S19.2E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 A W15 t
 S19.2E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 A W15 T
 S19.2E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 A W15 t
 S19.2E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 A W15 T

 3 5:

 S13.0E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F4] W15 B W15 t
 S13.0E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F5] W15 B W15 T
 S13.0E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F6] W15 B W15 t
 S13.0E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F7] W15 B W15 T


 This could mean that devices 1, 2 and 4 can receive S19.2E,
 while devices 3 and 5 can receive S13.0E.

 If no device numbers (followed by a ':') are given, a setup
 where every device can receive every satellite is assumed.

 Once a line with device numbers (followed by a ':') appears,
 these apply to all following diseqc lines, until the next
 line with device numbers is seen.
 If a diseqc line is parsed without a previous device line,
 that diseqc line applies to all devices.

 Klaus

 Dear Klaus, all,

 That sounds good.  Using this proposal I would configure my system with the 
 following diseqc.conf:

 # diseqc.conf

 S28.2E a1...
 S28.2E a2...
 S28.2E a3...
 S28.2E a4...

 S19.2E b1...
 S19.2E b2...
 S19.2E b3...
 S19.2E b4...

 S13.0E c1...
 S13.0E c2...
 S13.0E c3...
 S13.0E c4...

 2:

 S28.2E A1...
 S28.2E A2...
 S28.2E A3...
 S28.2E A4...

 S19.2E B1...
 S19.2E B2...
 S19.2E B3...
 S19.2E B4...

 S13.0E B1...
 S13.0E B2...
 S13.0E B3...
 S13.0E B4...

 # EOF

 where [a-cA-C][1-4]... are diseqc command sequences.

 If I understand correctly, with Klaus' proposal my 'normal' switch (card 1) 
 would use the [a-c][1-4]... commands, and my problem switch (attached to 
 card 2) would use the [A-C][1-4]... commands.  Any additional cards would 
 also use the [a-c][1-4]... commands.
 
 You would have to put
 
 1:
 
 at the beginning of that file, because otherwise everything before the
 
 2:
 
 would be applicable to 

Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-06 Thread Timothy D. Lenz
This would cause duplicate lines for devices that overlap, such has 
where there are both fixed and rotor dish. Better to include the 
supporting devices in the entries.



On 2/6/2010 4:57 AM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:

On 02.02.2010 07:35, Ian Bates wrote:

On 1 Feb 2010, at 22:24, abbe normal wrote:

On 2/1/10, VDR Useruser@gmail.com  wrote:

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim Sahinhalim.sa...@t-online.de  wrote:

Hi List and Klaus,

It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup directly in
vdr.

I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current solution is
difficult for endusers.
Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's commands.
A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
usability of vdr!

Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how to do
this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no support for
multiple switches.



hey guys

i agree multi cards should be able to use mutli diseqc configs... or
at least be able to assign them to different switches that could be
used... would be nice to add more dishes and lnbs to my setup... would
like to do c and ku band dvb as well as have at least 2 to 3 fixed
dishes with lnbs on them now im limited to 4 max or use a very costly
switch...

abby


Dear all,

I have a diseqc-patch I that hacked together a couple of years ago relating to 
multi-cards/multi-switches that has served my purpose well.  It may not be the 
best way, it may even be the wrong way.  I will drag it out of the VDR box for 
all to see but that will not be for a couple of days.

MOTIVATION

I have three LNBs (28.2/5, 19.2, 13.0) and two cards, each card attached to a 
4-way diseqc switch.  Despite the switches being the same model and bought at 
the same time each one responds to a different set of diseqc commands to change 
LNB.  IIRC one seemed to behave as a cascade of 2-way switches, the other 
responded to the more usual commands for a 4-way switch.

DESCRIPTION

Enter my hack.  It allows diseqc commands to be defined on a per-card basis 
(numbered 1, 2, ...).  How you determine which number corresponds to which card 
is left as an exercise for the reader (hint: the margin may not be big enough). 
 These defines are placed in 'diseqc-multi.conf' and start with the card number 
but are otherwise the same format as those found in 'diseqc.conf'.

CONFIGURATION

Configuration options within VDR are:

- use only the diseqc.conf defines,
- use only the diseqc-multi.conf,
- use the disqc-multi.conf if a card definition appears otherwise use the 
diseqc.conf defines.


I don't like the introduction of a separate diseqc-multi.conf file,
and also those additional setup options in VDR.

What about simply extending the existing diseqc.conf file to
accept device numbers, as in:

1 2 4:

S19.2E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 A W15 t
S19.2E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 A W15 T
S19.2E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 A W15 t
S19.2E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 A W15 T

3 5:

S13.0E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F4] W15 B W15 t
S13.0E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F5] W15 B W15 T
S13.0E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F6] W15 B W15 t
S13.0E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F7] W15 B W15 T


This could mean that devices 1, 2 and 4 can receive S19.2E,
while devices 3 and 5 can receive S13.0E.

If no device numbers (followed by a ':') are given, a setup
where every device can receive every satellite is assumed.

Once a line with device numbers (followed by a ':') appears,
these apply to all following diseqc lines, until the next
line with device numbers is seen.
If a diseqc line is parsed without a previous device line,
that diseqc line applies to all devices.

Klaus









___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr



___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-06 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 07.02.2010 00:31, Timothy D. Lenz wrote:
 This would cause duplicate lines for devices that overlap, such has
 where there are both fixed and rotor dish. Better to include the
 supporting devices in the entries.

I don't see what you mean.
Can you be more specific?

Klaus

 On 2/6/2010 4:57 AM, Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
 On 02.02.2010 07:35, Ian Bates wrote:
 On 1 Feb 2010, at 22:24, abbe normal wrote:
 On 2/1/10, VDR Useruser@gmail.com  wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim
 Sahinhalim.sa...@t-online.de  wrote:
 Hi List and Klaus,

 It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup directly in
 vdr.

 I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current
 solution is
 difficult for endusers.
 Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's
 commands.
 A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
 usability of vdr!
 Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
 more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how to do
 this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
 is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
 cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
 cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no support for
 multiple switches.


 hey guys

 i agree multi cards should be able to use mutli diseqc configs... or
 at least be able to assign them to different switches that could be
 used... would be nice to add more dishes and lnbs to my setup... would
 like to do c and ku band dvb as well as have at least 2 to 3 fixed
 dishes with lnbs on them now im limited to 4 max or use a very costly
 switch...

 abby

 Dear all,

 I have a diseqc-patch I that hacked together a couple of years ago
 relating to multi-cards/multi-switches that has served my purpose
 well.  It may not be the best way, it may even be the wrong way.  I
 will drag it out of the VDR box for all to see but that will not be
 for a couple of days.

 MOTIVATION

 I have three LNBs (28.2/5, 19.2, 13.0) and two cards, each card
 attached to a 4-way diseqc switch.  Despite the switches being the
 same model and bought at the same time each one responds to a
 different set of diseqc commands to change LNB.  IIRC one seemed to
 behave as a cascade of 2-way switches, the other responded to the
 more usual commands for a 4-way switch.

 DESCRIPTION

 Enter my hack.  It allows diseqc commands to be defined on a per-card
 basis (numbered 1, 2, ...).  How you determine which number
 corresponds to which card is left as an exercise for the reader
 (hint: the margin may not be big enough).  These defines are placed
 in 'diseqc-multi.conf' and start with the card number but are
 otherwise the same format as those found in 'diseqc.conf'.

 CONFIGURATION

 Configuration options within VDR are:

 - use only the diseqc.conf defines,
 - use only the diseqc-multi.conf,
 - use the disqc-multi.conf if a card definition appears otherwise use
 the diseqc.conf defines.

 I don't like the introduction of a separate diseqc-multi.conf file,
 and also those additional setup options in VDR.

 What about simply extending the existing diseqc.conf file to
 accept device numbers, as in:

 1 2 4:

 S19.2E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F0] W15 A W15 t
 S19.2E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F1] W15 A W15 T
 S19.2E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F2] W15 A W15 t
 S19.2E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F3] W15 A W15 T

 3 5:

 S13.0E  11700 V  9750  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F4] W15 B W15 t
 S13.0E  9 V 10600  t v W15 [E0 10 38 F5] W15 B W15 T
 S13.0E  11700 H  9750  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F6] W15 B W15 t
 S13.0E  9 H 10600  t V W15 [E0 10 38 F7] W15 B W15 T


 This could mean that devices 1, 2 and 4 can receive S19.2E,
 while devices 3 and 5 can receive S13.0E.

 If no device numbers (followed by a ':') are given, a setup
 where every device can receive every satellite is assumed.

 Once a line with device numbers (followed by a ':') appears,
 these apply to all following diseqc lines, until the next
 line with device numbers is seen.
 If a diseqc line is parsed without a previous device line,
 that diseqc line applies to all devices.

 Klaus

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-02 Thread Bikalexander
Ich glaube, dass GotoX und Go to Position auch sehr wichtig ist. Kann es
sein, dass vielleicht alle Patches die hier bis jetzt veröffentlicht wurden
unserem Klaus nicht gefallen haben?

Ist es vielleicht sinnvoller, dass Klaus einfach mal sagt wie er es sich
vorstellt, damit solche Patches mehr Chancen haben in VDR intergriert zu
werden.

Sorry für mein English.

2010/2/2 Ian Bates ian_and_joa...@talktalk.net

 On 1 Feb 2010, at 22:24, abbe normal wrote:
 
  On 2/1/10, VDR User user@gmail.com wrote:
  On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim Sahin halim.sa...@t-online.de
 wrote:
  Hi List and Klaus,
 
  It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup directly in
  vdr.
 
  I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current solution
 is
  difficult for endusers.
  Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's commands.
  A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
  usability of vdr!
 
  Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
  more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how to do
  this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
  is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
  cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
  cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no support for
  multiple switches.
 
 
 
  hey guys
 
  i agree multi cards should be able to use mutli diseqc configs... or
  at least be able to assign them to different switches that could be
  used... would be nice to add more dishes and lnbs to my setup... would
  like to do c and ku band dvb as well as have at least 2 to 3 fixed
  dishes with lnbs on them now im limited to 4 max or use a very costly
  switch...
 
  abby

 Dear all,

 I have a diseqc-patch I that hacked together a couple of years ago relating
 to multi-cards/multi-switches that has served my purpose well.  It may not
 be the best way, it may even be the wrong way.  I will drag it out of the
 VDR box for all to see but that will not be for a couple of days.

 MOTIVATION

 I have three LNBs (28.2/5, 19.2, 13.0) and two cards, each card attached to
 a 4-way diseqc switch.  Despite the switches being the same model and bought
 at the same time each one responds to a different set of diseqc commands to
 change LNB.  IIRC one seemed to behave as a cascade of 2-way switches, the
 other responded to the more usual commands for a 4-way switch.

 DESCRIPTION

 Enter my hack.  It allows diseqc commands to be defined on a per-card basis
 (numbered 1, 2, ...).  How you determine which number corresponds to which
 card is left as an exercise for the reader (hint: the margin may not be big
 enough).  These defines are placed in 'diseqc-multi.conf' and start with the
 card number but are otherwise the same format as those found in
 'diseqc.conf'.

 CONFIGURATION

 Configuration options within VDR are:

 - use only the diseqc.conf defines,
 - use only the diseqc-multi.conf,
 - use the disqc-multi.conf if a card definition appears otherwise use the
 diseqc.conf defines.

 CAVEATS

 For my purpose this patch works well.  I am aware there exist other
 multi-satellite/multi-card patches that may address a similar problem but I
 haven't used them.

 You'll have to wait a couple of days before I can pull it off my vdr box.
  Current version works with vdr-1.7.11.  This patch has survived with
 minimal/no changes from at least the first vdr-1.6 releases.


 Sorry to whet your appetites without satiating them.


 Ian.
 ___
 vdr mailing list
 vdr@linuxtv.org
 http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-02 Thread Bikalexander
I believe that GoToX and go to position is also very important. Could it be
that maybe all the patches that have been published here so far we do not
have Klaus fallen?

Is it perhaps better to say that Klaus just once as he imagines that such
patches have more opportunities to become integrated into VDR.

Sorry for my English.

2010/2/2 Bikalexander bikalexan...@gmail.com

 Ich glaube, dass GotoX und Go to Position auch sehr wichtig ist. Kann es
 sein, dass vielleicht alle Patches die hier bis jetzt veröffentlicht wurden
 unserem Klaus nicht gefallen haben?

 Ist es vielleicht sinnvoller, dass Klaus einfach mal sagt wie er es sich
 vorstellt, damit solche Patches mehr Chancen haben in VDR intergriert zu
 werden.

 Sorry für mein English.

 2010/2/2 Ian Bates ian_and_joa...@talktalk.net

 On 1 Feb 2010, at 22:24, abbe normal wrote:
 
  On 2/1/10, VDR User user@gmail.com wrote:
  On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim Sahin halim.sa...@t-online.de
 wrote:
  Hi List and Klaus,
 
  It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup directly in
  vdr.
 
  I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current solution
 is
  difficult for endusers.
  Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's
 commands.
  A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
  usability of vdr!
 
  Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
  more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how to do
  this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
  is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
  cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
  cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no support for
  multiple switches.
 
 
 
  hey guys
 
  i agree multi cards should be able to use mutli diseqc configs... or
  at least be able to assign them to different switches that could be
  used... would be nice to add more dishes and lnbs to my setup... would
  like to do c and ku band dvb as well as have at least 2 to 3 fixed
  dishes with lnbs on them now im limited to 4 max or use a very costly
  switch...
 
  abby

 Dear all,

 I have a diseqc-patch I that hacked together a couple of years ago
 relating to multi-cards/multi-switches that has served my purpose well.  It
 may not be the best way, it may even be the wrong way.  I will drag it out
 of the VDR box for all to see but that will not be for a couple of days.

 MOTIVATION

 I have three LNBs (28.2/5, 19.2, 13.0) and two cards, each card attached
 to a 4-way diseqc switch.  Despite the switches being the same model and
 bought at the same time each one responds to a different set of diseqc
 commands to change LNB.  IIRC one seemed to behave as a cascade of 2-way
 switches, the other responded to the more usual commands for a 4-way switch.

 DESCRIPTION

 Enter my hack.  It allows diseqc commands to be defined on a per-card
 basis (numbered 1, 2, ...).  How you determine which number corresponds to
 which card is left as an exercise for the reader (hint: the margin may not
 be big enough).  These defines are placed in 'diseqc-multi.conf' and start
 with the card number but are otherwise the same format as those found in
 'diseqc.conf'.

 CONFIGURATION

 Configuration options within VDR are:

 - use only the diseqc.conf defines,
 - use only the diseqc-multi.conf,
 - use the disqc-multi.conf if a card definition appears otherwise use the
 diseqc.conf defines.

 CAVEATS

 For my purpose this patch works well.  I am aware there exist other
 multi-satellite/multi-card patches that may address a similar problem but I
 haven't used them.

 You'll have to wait a couple of days before I can pull it off my vdr box.
  Current version works with vdr-1.7.11.  This patch has survived with
 minimal/no changes from at least the first vdr-1.6 releases.


 Sorry to whet your appetites without satiating them.


 Ian.
 ___
 vdr mailing list
 vdr@linuxtv.org
 http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr



___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-02 Thread VDR User
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Bikalexander bikalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
 I believe that GoToX and go to position is also very important. Could it be
 that maybe all the patches that have been published here so far we do not
 have Klaus fallen?

 Is it perhaps better to say that Klaus just once as he imagines that such
 patches have more opportunities to become integrated into VDR.

I think Klaus sometimes underestimates the number of VDR users
(especially North American), their setups, and possibly not aware of
their/our needs.   In all honestly the number of users I see on the
forums  this mailing list don't even come close to accurately
representing the real number of users.  It can be hard sometimes to
imagine different setup needs when your sample pool is relatively
small by comparison.  That's why I'm _constantly_ asking people to at
least join the mailing list and participate.  Now to figure out how to
actually make them do it! ;)

Cheers

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-01 Thread VDR User
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim Sahin halim.sa...@t-online.de wrote:
 Hi List and Klaus,

 It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup directly in
 vdr.

 I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current solution is
 difficult for endusers.
 Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's commands.
 A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
 usability of vdr!

Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how to do
this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no support for
multiple switches.

___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-01 Thread abbe normal
hey guys

i agree multi cards should be able to use mutli diseqc configs... or
at least be able to assign them to different switches that could be
used... would be nice to add more dishes and lnbs to my setup... would
like to do c and ku band dvb as well as have at least 2 to 3 fixed
dishes with lnbs on them now im limited to 4 max or use a very costly
switch...

abby

On 2/1/10, VDR User user@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim Sahin halim.sa...@t-online.de wrote:
 Hi List and Klaus,

 It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup directly in
 vdr.

 I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current solution is
 difficult for endusers.
 Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's commands.
 A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
 usability of vdr!

 Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
 more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how to do
 this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
 is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
 cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
 cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no support for
 multiple switches.

 ___
 vdr mailing list
 vdr@linuxtv.org
 http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr


Re: [vdr] feature request easy diseqc setup and channelscan for vdr

2010-02-01 Thread Ian Bates
On 1 Feb 2010, at 22:24, abbe normal wrote:
 
 On 2/1/10, VDR User user@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Halim Sahin halim.sa...@t-online.de wrote:
 Hi List and Klaus,
 
 It would be really nice if vdr could support diseqc setup directly in
 vdr.
 
 I don't know if this can be done by a plugin but the current solution is
 difficult for endusers.
 Setting a diseqc.conf needs some knowledge in diseqc and it's commands.
 A simple interface for creating a diseqc.conf can improove the
 usability of vdr!
 
 Personally I think adding support for multiple diseqc switches is a
 more important feature as I've noticed several users asking how to do
 this in VDR -- which it unfortunately doesn't support.  I think this
 is actually one of the reasons some guys fumble around trying to
 cascade their diseqc switches.  However, not all switches can be
 cascaded and so they're left stuck.  Can't cascade, and no support for
 multiple switches.
 
 
 
 hey guys
 
 i agree multi cards should be able to use mutli diseqc configs... or
 at least be able to assign them to different switches that could be
 used... would be nice to add more dishes and lnbs to my setup... would
 like to do c and ku band dvb as well as have at least 2 to 3 fixed
 dishes with lnbs on them now im limited to 4 max or use a very costly
 switch...
 
 abby

Dear all,

I have a diseqc-patch I that hacked together a couple of years ago relating to 
multi-cards/multi-switches that has served my purpose well.  It may not be the 
best way, it may even be the wrong way.  I will drag it out of the VDR box for 
all to see but that will not be for a couple of days.

MOTIVATION

I have three LNBs (28.2/5, 19.2, 13.0) and two cards, each card attached to a 
4-way diseqc switch.  Despite the switches being the same model and bought at 
the same time each one responds to a different set of diseqc commands to change 
LNB.  IIRC one seemed to behave as a cascade of 2-way switches, the other 
responded to the more usual commands for a 4-way switch.

DESCRIPTION

Enter my hack.  It allows diseqc commands to be defined on a per-card basis 
(numbered 1, 2, ...).  How you determine which number corresponds to which card 
is left as an exercise for the reader (hint: the margin may not be big enough). 
 These defines are placed in 'diseqc-multi.conf' and start with the card number 
but are otherwise the same format as those found in 'diseqc.conf'.

CONFIGURATION

Configuration options within VDR are:

- use only the diseqc.conf defines, 
- use only the diseqc-multi.conf, 
- use the disqc-multi.conf if a card definition appears otherwise use the 
diseqc.conf defines.

CAVEATS

For my purpose this patch works well.  I am aware there exist other 
multi-satellite/multi-card patches that may address a similar problem but I 
haven't used them.

You'll have to wait a couple of days before I can pull it off my vdr box.  
Current version works with vdr-1.7.11.  This patch has survived with minimal/no 
changes from at least the first vdr-1.6 releases.


Sorry to whet your appetites without satiating them.


Ian.
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr