Re: [vdr] new dvb api ?

2008-09-06 Thread Udo Richter
Jelle De Loecker wrote: > I was wondering what the people on the VDR ml thought about this. From a non-dvb-insider perspective who doesn't really need things like s2 right now, I'm seeing this form a relaxed point of view. The two APIs seem to do things different, but in the end they both offer

Re: [vdr] new dvb api ?

2008-09-04 Thread VDR User
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Jelle De Loecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering what the people on the VDR ml thought about this. > > Now that multiproto is finally complete, and VDR has excellent support for > it, some people want to create a completely new API. They say this is so

Re: [vdr] new dvb api ?

2008-09-04 Thread Jelle De Loecker
I was wondering what the people on the VDR ml thought about this. Now that multiproto is finally complete, and VDR has excellent support for it, some people want to create a completely new API. They say this is so that future modulations could be better supported, but multiproto can offer that