It looks like you were hit by this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875678
And the patch is here:
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/9193/
Itzik Brown:
Hi,
When trying to configure local storage domain I get an error.
Below some lines from vdsm.log:
Thread-46::DEBUG::2012-11-14
02:
Hi,
When trying to configure local storage domain I get an error.
Below some lines from vdsm.log:
Thread-46::DEBUG::2012-11-14
02:16:13,568::task::568::TaskManager.Task::(_updateState)
Task=`ff34ce79-4e9c-4e90-8598-4ec6bd9a682f`::moving from state init -> state
preparing
Thread-46::INFO::2012-1
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 09:46:43AM -0500, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Dan Kenigsberg"
> > To: vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org
> > Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 4:07:30 PM
> > Subject: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Nowadays,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:54:58PM +0100, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 12:16 PM, Zhou Zheng Sheng wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >In the latest version of pep8 checking tool, the rules are very strict.
> >Currently the VDSM project applies a less strict rule set by suppressing
> >some errors fr
On 11/13/2012 12:16 PM, Zhou Zheng Sheng wrote:
Hi all,
In the latest version of pep8 checking tool, the rules are very strict.
Currently the VDSM project applies a less strict rule set by suppressing
some errors from pep8. You can find them at Makefile.am . Under the
"check-local:" target, you
Hi all,
In the latest version of pep8 checking tool, the rules are very strict.
Currently the VDSM project applies a less strict rule set by suppressing
some errors from pep8. You can find them at Makefile.am . Under the
"check-local:" target, you will see
--ignore=E121,E122,E123,E124,E125,E126,E
- Original Message -
> From: "Alon Bar-Lev"
> To: "Simon Grinberg"
> Cc: vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org, "Mark Wu"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:13:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Simon Grinberg"
- Original Message -
> From: "Simon Grinberg"
> To: "Mark Wu"
> Cc: vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org, "Alon Bar-Lev"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:06:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration
>
>
> > > Hypervisor should be a total slave of manager (or cluste
> > Hypervisor should be a total slave of manager (or cluster), so I have
> > no problem in bypassing/disabling any distribution specific tool in
> > favour of atoms (brctl, iproute), in non persistence mode.
> Do you mean just using the utilities (brctl, iproute) on demand and not
> keeping an
- Original Message -
> From: "Mark Wu"
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev"
> Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" , vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:39:12 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration
> On 11/11/2012 10:46 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > - Original M
10 matches
Mail list logo