Re: [vdsm] Adding Local Storage Domain failed

2012-11-13 Thread Shu Ming
It looks like you were hit by this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875678 And the patch is here: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/9193/ Itzik Brown: Hi, When trying to configure local storage domain I get an error. Below some lines from vdsm.log: Thread-46::DEBUG::2012-11-14 02:

[vdsm] Adding Local Storage Domain failed

2012-11-13 Thread Itzik Brown
Hi, When trying to configure local storage domain I get an error. Below some lines from vdsm.log: Thread-46::DEBUG::2012-11-14 02:16:13,568::task::568::TaskManager.Task::(_updateState) Task=`ff34ce79-4e9c-4e90-8598-4ec6bd9a682f`::moving from state init -> state preparing Thread-46::INFO::2012-1

Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration

2012-11-13 Thread Adam Litke
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 09:46:43AM -0500, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" > > To: vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org > > Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 4:07:30 PM > > Subject: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration > > > > Hi, > > > > Nowadays,

Re: [vdsm] [PEP 8] About configuring editor plugins for checking PEP 8

2012-11-13 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:54:58PM +0100, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote: > On 11/13/2012 12:16 PM, Zhou Zheng Sheng wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >In the latest version of pep8 checking tool, the rules are very strict. > >Currently the VDSM project applies a less strict rule set by suppressing > >some errors fr

Re: [vdsm] [PEP 8] About configuring editor plugins for checking PEP 8

2012-11-13 Thread Vinzenz Feenstra
On 11/13/2012 12:16 PM, Zhou Zheng Sheng wrote: Hi all, In the latest version of pep8 checking tool, the rules are very strict. Currently the VDSM project applies a less strict rule set by suppressing some errors from pep8. You can find them at Makefile.am . Under the "check-local:" target, you

[vdsm] [PEP 8] About configuring editor plugins for checking PEP 8

2012-11-13 Thread Zhou Zheng Sheng
Hi all, In the latest version of pep8 checking tool, the rules are very strict. Currently the VDSM project applies a less strict rule set by suppressing some errors from pep8. You can find them at Makefile.am . Under the "check-local:" target, you will see --ignore=E121,E122,E123,E124,E125,E126,E

Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration

2012-11-13 Thread Simon Grinberg
- Original Message - > From: "Alon Bar-Lev" > To: "Simon Grinberg" > Cc: vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org, "Mark Wu" > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:13:41 AM > Subject: Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Simon Grinberg"

Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration

2012-11-13 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
- Original Message - > From: "Simon Grinberg" > To: "Mark Wu" > Cc: vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org, "Alon Bar-Lev" > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:06:42 AM > Subject: Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration > > > > > Hypervisor should be a total slave of manager (or cluste

Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration

2012-11-13 Thread Simon Grinberg
> > Hypervisor should be a total slave of manager (or cluster), so I have > > no problem in bypassing/disabling any distribution specific tool in > > favour of atoms (brctl, iproute), in non persistence mode. > Do you mean just using the utilities (brctl, iproute) on demand and not > keeping an

Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration

2012-11-13 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
- Original Message - > From: "Mark Wu" > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" > Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" , vdsm-de...@fedorahosted.org > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:39:12 AM > Subject: Re: [vdsm] Future of Vdsm network configuration > On 11/11/2012 10:46 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > - Original M